全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Towards Sensor-Based Health Monitoring Systems for Bridge Decks: A Full-Depth Precast Deck Panels Case Study

DOI: 10.1155/2010/579631

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Traffic and variable loading conditions greatly influence the performance, durability, and safety of a bridge structure throughout its service life. Continuous monitoring can provide the basis for determining the deterioration rate and for estimating the remaining service life, thus assisting in making important decisions regarding bridge maintenance. This paper presents the design and implementation of a health monitoring system for condition assessment of full-depth precast concrete bridge deck, which was developed for the Parkview Bridge in Kalamazoo, Michigan. This system is composed of a remotely accessible on-site data acquisition system and a sensor network of vibrating wire strain gauges to monitor strain and temperature over given time increments. The system relies on the sensor network embedded in the bridge deck to gather static performance data under different loading conditions to provide condition assessment by collecting, storing, analyzing, and reporting relevant performance data over time. The paper presents a practical case study that mainly focuses on describing the initial steps in the development of the sensor network system, namely, the design (system architecture and data structures) and construction along with examples of how the data is acquired, organized, presented, and analyzed, keeping in mind that the bridge is still early in its life-cycle and has not yet experienced any structural problems. 1. Introduction Bridges are a critical component of the transportation infrastructure. There are approximately 600,000 bridges in the United State according to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration [1]. Four billion vehicles traverse these bridges daily [2]. Regular inspections and maintenance are essential components of any bridge management program to ensure structural integrity and user safety. This is a grand challenge due to the enormous number of existing bridges. To assess the condition of a bridge, a few approaches are commonly used in practice. Visual inspection has a long history in bridge condition assessment and documents any sign of cracking, spalling, leaching, deflection and vibration, accidental damage, and deck surface damages. However, assessing the extent of structural deficiency of a concrete bridge is usually unreliable through visual inspections [2]. Coring samples provide a supplementary approach, in which small cores are drilled and concrete samples are obtained and tested in a laboratory. Since samples are taken from small selected portions of the concrete, erroneous conclusions

References

[1]  Federal Highway Administration (FWHA), “Deficient bridges by state and highway system,” U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/defbr07.cfm.
[2]  B. Phares, T. Wipf, L. Greimann, and Y. Lee, “Health monitoring of bridge structures and components using smart-structure technology,” Tech. Rep. 0092-04-14, Wisconsin Highway Research Program, WHRP 05-03, 2005.
[3]  NCHRP-234, Manual for Bridge Rating through Load Testing, Research results digest, no. 234, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
[4]  D. A. Howell and H. W. Shenton, “System for in-service strain monitoring of ordinary bridges,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 673–680, 2006.
[5]  J. R. Casas and P. J. S. Cruz, “Fiber optic sensors for bridge monitoring,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 362–373, 2003.
[6]  J. M. Ko and Y. Q. Ni, “Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges,” Engineering Structures, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1715–1725, 2005.
[7]  J. Olund and P. E. DeWolf, “Passive structural health monitoring of Connecticut's bridge infrastructure,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 330–339, 2007.
[8]  M. J. Chajes, H. W. Shenton, and D. O'Shea, “Bridge-condition assessment and load rating using nondestructive evaluation methods,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2, no. 1696, pp. 83–91, 2000.
[9]  M. Cheung, W. Li, and B. Noruziaan, “Data acquisition, processing and management systems for a Canadian bridge monitoring project,” in International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Bauhaus-Universitat, Weimar, Germany, June 2004, http://e-pub.uni-weimar.de/volltexte/2004/128/pdf/icccbe-x_012.pdf.
[10]  I. N. Robertson, “Prediction of vertical deflections for a long-span prestressed concrete bridge structure,” Engineering Structures, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1820–1827, 2005.
[11]  Y. Yang and J. J. Myers, “Live-load test results of Missouri's first high-performance concrete superstructure bridge,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1845, pp. 96–103, 2003.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133