Quantification of Testosterone (t) by 8 Immunoassays and by Liquid Chromatography -Tandem mass Spectrometry (lc -msms) in Normal and Hirsute Women: A Multicenter Study Cuantificación de testosterona (t) por 8 inmunoensayos y por cromatografía líquida en tandem con espectrometría de masa (Lc ms/ms): En mujeres normales e hirsutas. Estudio multicéntrico

Objective: To compare T results in normal and hirsute women, obtained by different laboratories employing the same or different methods, including an in-home RIA, and the gold standard method LC-MS/MS. In addition, T results were referred to a curve obtained by 6 different pools that had been prepared on the basis of LC-MS/MS results. Design: Prospective study Setting: Hormone Determination Laboratory, Hospital Italiano, La Plata, and private practice of each participant laboratory. Patient(s): Blood samples were obtained from 78 individuals sorted into 3 groups, namely, normal men (n:39), normal women (n:24) and hirsute women (n:15) Interventions(s): None Main Outcome Measure(s): To evaluate if the results obtained in each lab for each serum sample by the methods currently employed in our country are significantly different from those obtained by LC-MS/MS (Gold standard) Result(s) One out of the 24 NW showed high T values by LC - MS/MS. In each lab, except in 1 (Architect) T results of this serum sample were normal. Two out of the 15 hirsute patients showed normal T values (LC - MS/MS). Method and number of labs -shown between brackets- and percentages of normal T results (false negatives) are described for each method as follows: Chemiluminescence: Axsym - Abbott (Axn) - (3) 85, Architect - Abbott - (Arch); (2) 70; Immulite - Siemmens - (IMM); (2) 42; Electrochemiluminescence - Elecsys - Roche- ((EQL); (4) 52; Fluorescent enzymatic - Vidas - Bio-Merieux - (Vidas) (1) 69; Manual coated tube radioimmunoassay (RIA): RIA - Siemmens Coat-a-Count (RIA S); (3) 64; RIA - DSL Inc (RIA DSL); (1) 31; RIA - DIASource - (DiaS); (1) 31; and in-Home RIA (in-H) (1) 12. Statistically significant differences were obtained between different methods and against LC MS/MS. In-H method is the one that comes closest to 1 on the Weighted Deming regression and closest to zero on the SD intercept, (standard deviation of the constant in the straight line equation) indicating that the values match those obtained by LC - MS/MS. The values recorded by the various methods employed showed no significant modifications when plotted against a secondary standard curve. Conclusion(s) This indicates that the techniques in current use in our area underestimate hyperandrogenemia in these patients. Discrepancies are not due to the various calibration curves proposed in the corresponding commercial kits. The fact that the In-H technique affords finer results while employing a larger serum volume suggests that the disparities among the various commercial methods result from their limited sensiti