Coverage and frequency of remotely sensed forest structural information would benefit from single orbital platforms designed to collect sufficient data. We evaluated forest structural information content using single-date Hyperion hyperspectral imagery collected over full-canopy oak-hickory forests in the Ozark National Forest, Arkansas, USA. Hyperion spectral derivatives were used to develop machine learning regression tree rule sets for predicting forest neighborhood percentile heights generated from near-coincident Leica Geosystems ALS50 small footprint light detection and ranging (LIDAR). The most successful spectral predictors of LIDAR-derived forest structure were also tested with basal area measured in situ. Based on the machine learning regression trees developed, Hyperion spectral derivatives were utilized to predict LIDAR forest neighborhood percentile heights with accuracies between 2.1 and 3.7 m RMSE. Understory predictions consistently resulted in the highest accuracy of 2.1 m RMSE. In contrast, hyperspectral prediction of basal area measured in situ was only found to be 6.5 m 2/ha RMSE when the average basal area across the study area was ~12 m 2/ha. The results suggest, at a spatial resolution of 30 × 30 m, that orbital hyperspectral imagery alone can provide useful structural information related to vegetation height. Rapidly calibrated biophysical remote sensing techniques will facilitate timely assessment of regional forest conditions.
References
[1]
Battles, J.J.; Fahey, T.J. Gap dynamics following forest decline: A case study of red spruce forests. Ecol. Appl 2000, 10, 760–774, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0760:GDFFDA]2.0.CO;2.
Scott, J.T.; Siccama, T.G.; Johnson, A.H.; Breisch, A.R. Decline of red spruce in the Adirondacks, New York. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1984, 111, 438–444, doi:10.2307/2995893.
[4]
Chen, J.M.; Black, T.A. Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves. Plant Cell Environ 1992, 15, 421–429, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00992.x.
[5]
Blodgett, C.F.; Jakubauskas, M.E.; Price, K.P.; Martinko, E.A. Remote Sensing-Based Geostatistical Modeling of Forest Canopy Structure. Proceedings of ASPRS 2000 Annual Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 22–26 May 2000.
[6]
Manion, P.D. Evolution of concepts in forest pathology. Phytopathology 2003, 93, 1052–1055, doi:10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.8.1052. 18943876
Kasischke, E.S.; Goetz, S.; Hansen, M.C.; Ustin, S.; Ozdogan, M.; Woodcock, C.E.; Rogan, J. Temperate and Boreal Forests. , 3rd ed.Ustin, S.L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; Volume 4, p. 736.
[9]
Rubin, B.D.; Manion, P.D.; Faber-Langendoen, D. Diameter distributions and structural sustainability in forests. Forest Ecol. Manage 2006, 222, 427–238, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.049.
[10]
Wenger, K.F. Society of American Forestry Handbook; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1984; p. 1335.
[11]
Skelly, J.M. A. Closer Look at Forest Decline: A Need for More Accurate Diagnostics. In Forest Decline Concepts; Manion, P.D., Lachance, D., Eds.; APS Press: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 1992; pp. 85–107.
[12]
Franklin, S.E. Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; p. 407.
[13]
Husch, B.; Beers, T.W.; Kershaw, J.A.J. Forest Mensuration, 4th ed. ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2003; p. 443.
[14]
Schreuder, H.J.; Gregoire, T.G.; Wood, G.B. Sampling Methods for Multiresource Forest Inventory; John Wilet & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 446.
[15]
West, P.W. Tree and Forest Measurment; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2004; p. 167.
[16]
Jensen, J.R. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 3rd ed. ed.; Pearson Education INC.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2005; p. 526.
[17]
Jensen, J.R. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective, 2nd ed. ed.; Pearson Prentice Hill: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2007; p. 592.
[18]
Asner, G.P.; Hicke, J.A.; Lobell, D.B. Per-Pixel Analysis of Forest Structure: Vegetation Indices, Spectral Mixture Analysis and Canopy Reflectance Modeling. In Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies; Wulder, M.A., Franklin, S.E., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 209–254.
[19]
Anderson, J.E.; Plourde, L.C.; Martin, M.E.; Braswell, B.H.; Smith, M.L.; Dubayah, R.O.; Hofton, M.A.; Blair, J.B. Integrating waveform lidar with hyperspectral imagery for inventory of a northern temperate forest. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 1856–1870, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.09.009.
[20]
Hudak, A.T.; Lefsky, M.A.; Cohen, W.B.; Berterretche, M. Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 82, 397–416, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00056-1.
Stone, J.N.; Porter, J.L. What is forest structure and how to measure it? Northwest Sci 1998, 72, 25–26.
[23]
Leutner, B.F.; Reineking, B.; Bachmann, M.; Beierkuhnlein, C.; Dech, S.; Wegmann, M. Modelling forest a-diversity and floristic composition—On the added value of LiDAR plus hyperspectral remote sensing. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 2818–2845, doi:10.3390/rs4092818.
[24]
Wynne, R.H. Lidar remote sensing of forest resources at the scale of management. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2006, 72, 1311–1313.
[25]
Mundt, J.T.; Streutker, D.R.; Glenn, N.F. Mapping sagebrush distribution using fusion of hyperspectral and lidar classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2006, 72, 47–54.
[26]
Foody, G.M.; Muslim, A.M.; Atkinson, P.M. Super-resolution mapping of the waterline from remotely sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens 2005, 26, 5381–5392, doi:10.1080/01431160500213292.
[27]
Puzzolo, V.; Maselli, F.; Marchetti, M.; Buongiorno, F. Multi-Seasonal Classification of LANDSAT TM Images for Increasing Forest Type Discrimination in Mediterranean Environment. In Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images; Smits, P., Bruzzone, L., Eds.; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2003; pp. 322–329.
[28]
Thornton, M.W.; Atkinson, P.M.; Holland, D.A. Sub-pixel mapping of rural land cover objects from fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery using super-resolution swapping. Int. J. Remote Sens 2006, 27, 473–491, doi:10.1080/01431160500207088.
[29]
Aplin, P. On scales and dynamics in observing the environment. Int. J. Remote Sens 2006, 27, 2123–2140, doi:10.1080/01431160500396477.
[30]
Townsend, P.A.; Foster, J.R.; Chastain, R.A.J.; Currie, W.S. Application of imaging spectroscopy to mapping canopy nitrogen in the forests of the central appalachian mountains using Hyperion and AVIRIS. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2003, 41, 1347–1354, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2003.813205.
[31]
Hyde, P.; Dubayah, R.; Walker, W.; Blair, J.B.; Hofton, M.; Hunsaker, C. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sens. Environ 2006, 102, 63–73, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.021.
[32]
Gemmell, F.M. Effects of forest cover, terrain and scale on timber volume estimation with Thematic Mapper data in a rocky mountain site. Remote Sens. Environ 1995, 51, 291–305, doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)00056-S.
[33]
Peterson, D.L.; Westman, W.E.; Stephenson, N.J.; Ambrosia, V.G.; Brass, J.A.; Spanner, M.A. Analysis of forest structure using Thematic Mapper simulator data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1986, GE-24, 113–120, doi:10.1109/TGRS.1986.289692.
[34]
Tokola, T.; Sarkeala, J.; van der Linden, M. Use of topographic correction in Landsat Tm-based forest interpretation in Nepal. Int. J. Remote Sens 2001, 22, 551–563, doi:10.1080/01431160050505856.
[35]
Bassow, S.L.; Bazzaz, F.A. How environmental conditions affect canopy leaf-level photosynthesis in four deciduous tree species. Ecology 1998, 79, 2660–2675, doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2660:HECACL]2.0.CO;2.
[36]
Epron, D.; Dreyer, E. Long-term effects of drought on photosynthesis of adult oak trees [Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.] in a natural stand. New Phytol 1993, 125, 381–389, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03890.x.
[37]
Starkey, D.A.; Oliveria, F.; Mangini, A.; Mielke, M. Oak Decline and Red Oak Borer in the Interior Highlands of Arkansas and Missouri: Natural Phenomena, Severe Occurrences. In Technical Report SRS-73; Spetich, M., Ed.; Southern Research Station, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Asheville, NC, USA, 2004; Volume SRS-73, pp. 217–222.
[38]
Wang, C.; Lu, Z.; Haithcoat, T.L. Using Landsat images to detect oak decline in the Mark Twain National Forest, Ozark HIghlands. Forest Ecol. Manage 2007, 240, 70–78, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.007.
Rosson, J.F., Jr. The Woody Biomass Resource of Arkansas, 1988; USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; p. 130.
[41]
USGS. United States Geological Survey EO-1, Available online: http://eo1.usgs.gov/index.php (accessed on 1 August 2009).
[42]
Shiver, B.D.; Borders, B.E. Sampling Techniques for Forest Resource Inventory; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1996; p. 356.
[43]
Bitterlich, W. Die winkelzahlmessung (Measurement of basal area per hectare by means of angle measurement). Allg. Forest. Holzwirtsch. Ztg 1947, 59, 4–5.
[44]
Grosenburgh, L.R. Better Diagnosis and Prescrirtion in Southern Forest Management; USDA Forest Service Publication: Washington, DC, USA, 1955.
[45]
Grosenburgh, L.R. Point-Sampling and Line-Sampling: Probability Theory, Geometric Implications, Synthesis; USDA Forest Service Publication: Washington, DC, USA, 1958.
[46]
RuleQuest, R. An Overview of Cubist, Available online: http://www.rulequest.com/cubist-win.html (accessed on 1 August 2009).
[47]
Tullis, J.A.; Wilson, J.; Defibaugh y Chavez, J.; Stephen, F.M.; Fierke, M.; Riggins, J. Remote Sensing-Assisted Decision Support for Red Oak Borer Hazard Response in Upland Oak-hickory Forests. Proceedings of ASPRS 2007 Annual Convention, Tampa, FL, USA, 7–11 May 2007.
[48]
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Solar Position Calculator, Available online: http://www.srrb.noaa.gov/highlights/sunrise/azel.html (accessed on 1 August 2009).
[49]
Hall, R.J.; Peddle, D.R.; Klita, D.L. Mapping conifer understory within boreal mixedwoods from Landsat TM Satellite imagery and forest inventory information. Forestry Chron 2000, 76, 887–902.
[50]
Sims, D.A.; Gamon, J.A. Estimation of vegetation water content and photosynthetic tissue area from spectral reflectance: A comparison of indices based on liquid water and chlorophyll absorption features. Remote Sens. Environ 2003, 84, 526–537, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00151-7.
[51]
Thenkabail, P.S.; Smith, R.B.; de Pauw, E. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and their relationships with agricultural crop characteristics. Remote Sens. Environ 2000, 71, 158–182, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00067-X.
[52]
Galvao, D.M.; Formaggio, A.R.; Tisot, D.A. Discrimination of surface varirties in southeastern brazil with EO-1 Hyperion data. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 94, 523–534, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.11.012.
[53]
Gao, B.C. NDVI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ 1996, 58, 257–266, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3.
[54]
Hardisky, M.A.; Klemas, V.; Smart, M. The influence of soil salinity, growth from and leaf moisture on the spectral radiance of spartina alterniflora canopies. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 1983, 49, 77–83.
[55]
Jin, S.; Sader, S.A. Comparison of time series tasseled cap wetness and the normalized difference moisture index in detecting forest disturbances. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 94, 364–372, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.012.
[56]
Clevers, W.B. Imaging Spectrometry in Agriculture: Plant Vitality and Yeild Indicators. In Imaging Spectrometry: A Tool for Environmental Observations; Hill, J., Megier, J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 193–219.
[57]
Pu, R.; Gong, P.; Biging, G.S.; Larrieu, M.R. Extraction of red edge optical parameters from hyperion data for estimation of forest leaf area index. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2003, 41, 916–921, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2003.813555.
[58]
Le Maire, G.; Fran？ois, C.; Dufrêne, E. Towards universal broad leaf chlorophyll indices using PROSPECT simulated database and hyperspectral reflectance measurements. Remote Sens. Environ 2004, 89, 1–28, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.004.
[59]
Green, R.O.; Berman, M.; Switzer, P.; Craig, M.D. A transformation for orderingmultispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 1988, 26, 65–74, doi:10.1109/36.3001.
[60]
Eklundh, L.; Harrie, L.; Kuusk, A. Investigating relationships between Landsat ETM+ sensor data and Leaf area index in a boreal conifer forest. Remote Sens. Environ 2001, 78, 239–251, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00222-X.
[61]
Eriksson, H.M.; Eklundh, L.; Kuusk, A.; Nilson, T. Impact of understory vegetation on forest canopy reflectance and remotely sensed LAI estimates. Remote Sens. Environ 2006, 103, 408–418, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.005.
[62]
Rautiainen, M. Retrieval of leaf area index for coniferous forest by inverting a forest reflectance model. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 99, 295–303, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.09.004.
[63]
Xian, G.; Zhu, Z.; Hoppus, M.; Fleming, M. Application of Decision-Tree Techniques to Forest Group and Basal Area Mapping Using Satellite Imagery and Forest Inventory Data. Proceedings of Pecora 15/Land Satellite Information IV/ISPRS Commission I/FIEOS 2002 Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 10–14 November 2002; 15, pp. 10–15.
[64]
USGS-NPS. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, Available online: http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/spatial-tech/umesc_npmap.html (accessed on 1 August 2009).
[65]
Kalacska, M.; Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A.; Rivard, B.; Caelli, T.; White, H.P.; Calvo-Alvarado, J.C. Ecological fingerprinting of ecosystem succession: Estimating secondary tropical dry forest structure and deversity using imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens. Environ 2007, 108, 82–96, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.007.
[66]
Chopping, M.; Moisen, G.G.; Su, L.H.; Laliberte, A.; Rango, A.; Martonchik, J.V.; Peters, D.P.C. Large area mapping of southwestern forest crown cover, canopy height and biomass using the NASA multiangle imaging spectro-radiometer. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 2051–2063, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.024.
[67]
Palace, M.; Keller, M.; Asner, G.P.; Hagen, S.; Braswell, B. Amazon forest structure from IKONOS satellite data and the automated characterization of forest canopy properties. Biotropica 2008, 40, 141–150, doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00353.x.
[68]
Schlerf, M.; Atzberger, C. Inversion of a forest reflectance model to estimate structural canopy variables from hyperspectral remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ 2006, 100, 281–294, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.006.
[69]
Ramsey, E.; Nelson, G. A whole image approach using field measurements for transforming EO1 Hyperion hyperspectral data into canopy reflectance spectra. Int. J. Remote Sens 2005, 26, 1589–1610, doi:10.1080/0431160512331326729.
[70]
Cochrane, W.G. Using vegetation reflectance variability for species level classification of hyperspectral data. Int. J. Remote Sens 2000, 21, 2075–2087, doi:10.1080/01431160050021303.
