Vegetation communities are traditionally mapped from aerial photography interpretation. Other semi-automated methods include pixel- and object-based image analysis. While these methods have been used for decades, there is a lack of comparative research. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of seven approaches to map vegetation communities in a northern Australia’s tropical savanna environment. The seven approaches included: (1). aerial photography interpretation, (2). pixel-based image-only classification (Maximum Likelihood Classifier), (3). pixel-based integrated classification (Maximum Likelihood Classifier), (4). object-based image-only classification (nearest neighbor classifier), (5). object-based integrated classification (nearest neighbor classifier), (6).？object-based image-only classification (step-wise ruleset), and (7). object-based integrated classification (step-wise ruleset). Approach 1 was applied to 1:50,000 aerial photography and approaches 2–7 were applied to SPOT5 and Landsat5 TM multispectral data. The integrated approaches (3, 5 and 7) included ancillary data (a digital elevation model, slope model, normalized difference vegetation index and hydrology information). The cost-effectiveness was assessed taking into consideration the accuracy and costs associated with each classification approach and image dataset. Accuracy was assessed in terms of overall accuracy and the costs were evaluated using four main components: field data acquisition and preparation, image data acquisition and preparation, image classification and accuracy assessment. Overall accuracy ranged from 28%, for the image-only pixel-based approach, to 67% for the aerial photography interpretation, while total costs ranged from AU$338,000 to AU$388,180 (Australian dollars), for the pixel-based image-only classification and aerial photography interpretation respectively. The most labor-intensive component was field data acquisition and preparation, followed by image data acquisition and preparation, classification and accuracy assessment.
References
[1]
Thackway, R.; Lee, A.; Donohue, R.; Keenan, R.J.; Wood, M. Vegetation information for improved natural resource management in Australia. Landsc. Urban Plan 2007, 79, 127–136.
[2]
Weiers, S.; Bock, M.; Wissen, M.; Godela, R. Mapping and indicator approaches for the assessment of habitats at different scales using remote sensing and GIS methods. Landsc. Urban Plan 2004, 67, 43–65.
[3]
Kerr, J.; Ostrovsky, M. From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol. Evol 2003, 18, 299–305.
[4]
Wulder, M.A.; Franklin, S.E. Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA, USA, 2003.
[5]
Franklin, S.E. Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management; Lewis Publishers, CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001.
[6]
Mehner, H.; Cutler, M.; Fairbairn, D.; Thompson, G. Remote sensing of upland vegetation: the potential of high spatial resolution satellite sensors. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr 2004, 13, 359–369.
[7]
Lees, B.G.; Ritman, K. Decision-tree and rule-induction approach to integration of remotely sensed and GIS data in mapping vegetation in disturbed or hilly environments. Environ. Manage 1991, 15, 823–831.
[8]
Lu, D.; Weng, Q. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int. J. Remote Sens 2007, 28, 823–870.
[9]
Miller, J.; Franklin, J.; Aspinall, R. Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models. Ecol. Model 2007, 202, 225–242.
[10]
Goetz, S.J.; Wright, R.K.; Smith, A.J.; Zinecker, E.; Schaub, E. IKONOS imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region. Remote Sens. Environ 2003, 88, 195–208.
[11]
Koch, B.; Ivitis, E.; Jochum, M. Forest classification with eCognition and ERDAS expert classifier: Object-based versus Pixel-based. GIM Int 2003, 17, 12–15.
[12]
Flanders, D.; Hall-Beyer, M.; Pereverzoff, J. Preliminary evaluation of eCognition object-based software for cut block delineation and feature extraction. Can. J. Remote Sens 2003, 29, 441–452.
[13]
Laliberte, A.; Fredrickson, E.; Rango, A. Combining decision trees with hierarchical object-oriented image analysis for mapping arid rangelands. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2007, 73, 197–207.
[14]
Ivits, E.; Koch, B.; Blaschke, T.; Waser, L. Landscape Connectivity Studies on Segmentation Based Classification and Manual Interpretation of Remote Sensing Data. Proceedings of eCognition User Meeting, Munich, Germany, 28–30 October 2002.
[15]
Wang, L.; Sousa, W.P.; Gong, P. Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with IKONOS imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens 2004, 25, 5655–5668.
[16]
Gibbes, C.; Adhikari, S.; Rostant, L.; Southworth, J.; Qiu, Y. Application of object based classification and high resolution satellite imagery for savannah ecosystem analysis. Remote Sens 2010, 2, 2748–2772.
[17]
Mumby, P.; Edwards, A. Mapping marine environments with IKONOS imagery: Enhanced spatial resolution can deliver greater thematic accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 82, 248–257.
[18]
Stickler, C.; Southworth, J. Application of multi-scale spatial and spectral analysis for predicting primate occurance and habitat associations in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 2170–2186.
[19]
Gould, W. Remote sensing of vegetation, plant species richness, and regional biodiversity hotspots. Ecol. Appl 2000, 10, 1861–1870.
[20]
Lewis, M. Species composition related to spectral classification in an Australian spinifex hummock grassland. Int. J. Remote Sens 1994, 15, 3223–3239.
[21]
Lewis, M. Numeric classification as an aid to spectral mapping of vegetation communities. Plant Ecol 1998, 136, 133–149.
[22]
Ozesmi, S.; Bauer, M. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecol. Manage 2002, 10, 381–402.
[23]
Richards, J.; Landgrebe, D.; Swain, P. A means of utlising ancillary information in multispectral classification. Remote Sens. Environ 1982, 12, 463–477.
[24]
Tunstall, B.; Harrison, B.; Jupp, D. Incorporation of Geographical Data in the Analysis of Landsat Imagery for Land-Use Mapping—A Case Example. Proceedings of Australasian Remote Sensing Conference, Adelaide, Australia, August 1987.
[25]
Rogan, J.; Franklin, J.; Roberts, D. A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 80, 143–156.
[26]
Howe, D.. Personal Communication2006.
[27]
Wilson, B.. Personal Communication2006.
[28]
Mumby, P.J.; Green, E.P.; Edwards, A.J.; Clark, C.D. The cost-effectiveness of remote sensing for tropical coastal resources assessment and management. J. Environ. Manage 1999, 55, 157–166.
[29]
Malthus, T.J.; Mumby, P.J. Remote sensing of the coastal zone: An overview and priorities for future research. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24, 2805–2815.
[30]
Phinn, S.R.; Stow, D.A.; Franklin, J.; Mertes, L.A.K.; Michaelsen, J. Remotely sensed data for ecosystem analyses: Combining hierarchy theory and scene models. Environ. Manage 2003, 31, 429–441.
[31]
Green, E.P.; Mumby, P.J.; Edwards, A.J.; Clark, C.D. Remote Sensing Handbook for Tropical Coastal Management; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2000.
[32]
Stehman, S.V. Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ 1997, 62, 77–89.
[33]
Foody, G.M. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 80, 185–201.
[34]
Jensen, J.R. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2005.
[35]
Congalton, R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ 1991, 37, 35–46.
[36]
Pontius, R.G.; Millones, M. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int. J. Remote Sens 2012, 32, 4407–4429.
Wulder, M. Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Progr. Phys. Geogr 1998, 22, 449–476.
[39]
de Bruin, S.; Hunter, G.J. Making the trade-off between decision quality and information cost. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2003, 69, 91–98.
[40]
Lewis, D.; Hill, J.; Cowie, I.D. Bullo River Station Flora and Vegetation Survey, Northern Territory: and Reconnaissance Soil-Landscape Investigation. Technical Report No. 02/2010D; Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport, Northern Territory Government: Palmerston, NT, Australia, 2010.
[41]
Hnatiuk, K.; Thackway, R.; Walker, J. Vegetation. In Australian Soil and Land Survey: Field Handbook; CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, VIC, Australia, 2008; p. 111.
[42]
ESCAVI. Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual: National Vegetation Information System. Version 6.0.; Executive Steering Committee for Australian Vegetation Information, Department of the Environment and Heritage: Canberra, Australia, 2003.
[43]
Lewis, D.; Phinn, S. Accuracy assessment of vegetation community maps generated by aerial photography interpretation: Perspective from the tropical savanna, Australia. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2011, doi:10.1117/1.3662885.
[44]
Tickell, S.J.; Rajaratnam, L.R. Water Resources Survey of the Western Victoria River District, Bullo River Station; Power and Water Authority, Water Resources Division, Northern Territory Government: Darwin, NT, Australia, 1995.
[45]
Curran, P.J. Classification. In Principles of Remote Sensing; Longman: London, UK, 1985; pp. 209–216.
[46]
Green, E; Clark, C; Mumby, P; Edwards, A; Ellis, A. Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens 1998, 5, 935–956.
[47]
Lillesand, T; Kiefer, R. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation; John Wiley and Sons Inc: New York, NY, USA, 1994.
[48]
Mather, P. Computer Processing of Remotely Sensed Images: An Introduction; John Wiley and Sons Ltd: West Sussex, UK, 1999.
[49]
Lewis, D.; Phinn, S.; Pfitzner, K. Pixel-based image classification to map vegetation communities using SPOT5 and Landsat5 Thematic Mapper data in a tropical savanna, northern Australia. Can. J. Remote Sens., 2012. accepted.
[50]
Lewis, D.; Phinn, S.; Arroyo, L. Object-based image analysis to map vegetation communities using SPOT5, Landsat5 TM, field and ancillary data in a tropical savanna, northern Australia. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2012. accepted.
[51]
Salehi, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, M.; Vivek, D. Object-based classification of urban areas using VHR imagery and height points ancillary data. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 2256–2276.
[52]
Bahadur, K. Improving Landsat and IRS image classification: evaluation of unsupervised and supervised classification through band ratios and DEM in a mountainous landscape in Nepal. Remote Sens 2009, 1, 1257–1272.
[53]
Polychronaki, A.; Gitas, I.Z. Burned area mapping in Greece using SPOT4-HRVIR images and object-based image analysis. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 424–438.
[54]
Whiteside, T.G.; Boggs, G.S.; Maier, S.W. Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifications for mapping savannas. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf 2011, 13, 884–893.
[55]
Duro, D.C.; Franklin, S.E.; Dube, M.G. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT5 HRG imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2012, 118, 259–272.
[56]
Yan, G.; Mas, J.F.; Maathuis, B.H.P.; Xiangmin, Z.; Dijk, P.M.V. Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches—A case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int. J. Remote Sens 2006, 27, 4039–4055.
[57]
Harvey, K.R.; Hill, G.J.E. Vegetation mapping of a tropical freshwater swamp in the Northern Territory, Australia: A comparison of aerial photography, Landsat TM and SPOT satellite imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens 2001, 22, 2911–2925.
[58]
Dingle Robertson, L.; King, D.J. Comparison of pixel- and object-based classification in land cover change mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens 2011, 32, 1505–1529.
[59]
Benson, J. Sampling, strategies and costs of regional vegetation mapping. The Globe, Journal of the Australian Map Circle 1995, 43, 18–27.
[60]
Neldner, J.V. Vegetation Survey and Mapping in Queensland: Its Relevance and Future, and the Contribution of the Queensland Herbarium. Queensland Botany Bulletin No. 12; Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Heritage: Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 1994.
