Over the past few decades, clearing for shrimp farming has caused severe losses of mangroves in the Mekong Delta (MD) of Vietnam. Although the increasing importance of shrimp aquaculture in Vietnam has brought significant financial benefits to the local communities, the rapid and largely uncontrolled increase in aquacultural area has contributed to a considerable loss of mangrove forests and to environmental degradation. Although different approaches have been used for mangrove classification, no approach to date has addressed the challenges of the special conditions that can be found in the aquaculture-mangrove system in the Ca Mau province of the MD. This paper presents an object-based classification approach for estimating the percentage of mangroves in mixed mangrove-aquaculture farming systems to assist the government to monitor the extent of the shrimp farming area. The method comprises multi-resolution segmentation and classification of SPOT5 data using a decision tree approach as well as local knowledge from the region of interest. The results show accuracies higher than 75% for certain classes at the object level. Furthermore, we successfully detect areas with mixed aquaculture-mangrove land cover with high accuracies. Based on these results, mangrove development, especially within shrimp farming-mangrove systems, can be monitored. However, the mangrove forest cover fraction per object is affected by image segmentation and thus does not always correspond to the real farm boundaries. It remains a serious challenge, then, to accurately map mangrove forest cover within mixed systems.
References
[1]
R？nnb？ck, P.; Rona, B.; Ingwall, L. The return of ecosystem goods and services in replanted mangrove forests—Perspectives from local communities in Gazi Bay, Kenya. Environ. Conserv 2007, 34, 313–324.
[2]
Alongi, D.M. Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ. Conserv 2002, 29, 331–349.
[3]
Kathiresan, K.; Bingham, B.L. Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Adv. Mar. Biol 2001, 40, 1–145.
[4]
Vo, Q.T.; Kuenzer, C.; Vo, Q.M.; Moder, F.; Oppelt, N. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic 2012, 23, 431–446, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.022.
[5]
Giri, C.; Muhlhausen, J. Mangrove forest distributions and dynamics in madagascar (1975–2005). Sensors 2008, 8, 2104–2117, doi:10.3390/s8042104.
[6]
Kuenzer, C.; Bluemel, A.; Gebhardt, S.; Quoc, T.V.; Dech, S. Remote sensing of mangrove ecosystems: A review. Remote Sens 2011, 3, 878–928, doi:10.3390/rs3050878.
[7]
Thampanya, U.; Vermaat, J.E.; Sinsakul, S.; Panapitukkul, N. Coastal erosion and mangrove progradation of Southern Thailand. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci 2006, 68, 75–85, doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.01.011.
[8]
Hammer, M.; Holmlund, C.M.; Aqvist, M. Social-ecological feedback links for ecosystem management: A case study of fisheries in the Central Baltic Sea archipelago. Ocean Coast. Manag 2003, 46, 527–545, doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(03)00033-4.
[9]
De Groot, R. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ 2002, 41, 393–408, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7.
[10]
Ronnback, P.; Crona, B.; Ingwall, L. The return of ecosystem goods and services in replanted mangrove forests: Perspectives from local communities in Kenya. Environ. Conserv 2007, 34, 313–324.
[11]
Seto, K.C.; Fragkias, M. Mangrove conversion and aquaculture development in Vietnam: A remote sensing-based approach for evaluating the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Glob. Environ. Change 2007, 17, 486–500, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.03.001.
[12]
Badola, R.; Hussain, S.A. Valuing ecosystem functions: an empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environ. Conserv 2005, 32, 85–92, doi:10.1017/S0376892905001967.
[13]
Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Jayatissa, L.P.; Di Nitto, D.; Bosire, J.O.; Lo Seen, D.; Koedam, N. How effective were mangroves as a defence against the recent tsunami? Curr. Biol 2005, 15, R443–7, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.008. 15964259
[14]
Barbier, E.B. Natural barriers to natural disasters: replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front. Ecol. Environ 2006, 4, 124–131, doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0124:NBTNDR]2.0.CO;2.
[15]
Gstaiger, V.; Huth, J.; Gebhardt, S.; Kuenzer, C. Multi-sensoral and automated derivation of inundated areas using TerraSAR-X and ENVISAT ASAR data. Int. J. Remote Sens 2012, 33, 37–41.
[16]
Bann, C. The Economic Valuation of Tropical Forest Land Use Options: A Manual for Researchers; Economy and Environment Program for Southest Asia: Singapore, 1997.
[17]
Walters, B.B.; R？nnb？ck, P.; Kovacs, J.M.; Crona, B.; Hussain, S.A.; Badola, R.; Primavera, J.H.; Barbier, E.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F. Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: A review. Aquat. Bot 2008, 89, 220–236, doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.02.009.
[18]
Primavera, J.H. The values of wetlands: landscape and institutional development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: Institutional issues. Ecol. Econ 2000, 35, 91–106, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00170-1.
[19]
Penha-Lopes, G.; Bartolini, F.; Limbu, S.; Cannicci, S.; Mgaya, Y.; Kristensen, E.; Paula, J. Ecosystem engineering potential of the gastropod Terebralia palustris (Linnaeus, 1767) in mangrove wastewater wetlands—A controlled mesocosm experiment. Environ. Pollut 2010, 158, 258–266, doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.009. 19640623
[20]
R？nnb？ck, P. The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecol. Econ 1999, 29, 235–252, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00016-6.
[21]
Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260, doi:10.1038/387253a0.
[22]
Tue, N.T.; Ngoc, N.T.; Quy, T.D.; Hamaoka, H.; Nhuan, M.T.; Omori, K. A cross-system analysis of sedimentary organic carbon in the mangrove ecosystems of Xuan Thuy National Park, Vietnam. J. Sea Res 2012, 67, 69–76, doi:10.1016/j.seares.2011.10.006.
[23]
Valiela, I.; Bowen, J.L.; York, J.K. Mangrove forests: One of the world’ s threatened major tropical environments. BioScience 2001, 51, 807–815, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0807:MFOOTW]2.0.CO;2.
[24]
Alongi, D.M. Mangrove forests: Resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci 2008, 76, 1–13, doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024.
[25]
Barbier, E.; Cox, M. Economic and demographic factors affecting mangrove loss in the coastal provinces of Thailand, 1979–1996. Ambio 2002, 31, 351–357. 12174606
[26]
Huth, J.; Kuenzer, C.; Wehrmann, T.; Gebhardt, S.; Tuan, V.Q.; Dech, S. Land cover and land use classification with TWOPAC: Towards automated processing for pixel- and object-based image classification. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 2530–2553, doi:10.3390/rs4092530.
[27]
Kuenzer, C.; Renaud, F.G. Climate Change and Environmental Change in River Deltas Globally: Expected Impacts, Reilience, and Adaptation. In The Mekong Delta System—Interdisciplinary Analyses of a River Delta; Springer: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 7–48.
[28]
Binh, T.N.K.; Vromant, N.; Hung, N.T.; Hens, L.; Boon, E.K. Land cover changes between 1968 and 2003 in Cai Nuoc, Ca Mau Peninsula, Vietnam. Area 2003, 7, 519–536.
[29]
Green, E.P.; Cb, C.; Clark, C.D.; Mumby, P.J.; Edwards, A.J.; Ne, T.; Ellis, A.C. Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens 1998, 19, 935–956, doi:10.1080/014311698215801.
[30]
Rasolofoharinoro, M.; Blasco, F. A remote sensing based methodology for mangrove studies in Madagascar. Int. J. Remote Sens 1998, 19, 1873–1886, doi:10.1080/014311698215036.
[31]
Tong, P.H.S.; Auda, Y.; Populus, J.; Aizpuru, M.; Al Habshi, A.; Al Blasco, F. Assessment from space of mangroves evolution in the Mekong delta, in relation with extensive shrimp-farming. Int. J. Remote Sens 2004, 25, 4795–4812, doi:10.1080/01431160412331270858.
[32]
Thu, P.M.; Populus, J. Status and changes of mangrove forest in Mekong Delta: Case study in Tra Vinh, Vietnam. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci 2007, 71, 98–109, doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.08.007.
[33]
Kamal, M.; Phinn, S. Hyperspectral data for mangrove species mapping: A comparison of pixel-based and object-based approach. Remote Sens 2011, 3, 2222–2242, doi:10.3390/rs3102222.
[34]
Lee, T.; Yeh, H. Applying remote sensing techniques to monitor shifting wetland vegetation: A case study of Danshui River estuary mangrove communities, Taiwan. Ecol. Eng 2008, 5, 487–496.
[35]
Béland, M.; Go？ta, K.; Bonn, F.; Pham, T.T.H. Assessment of land-cover changes related to shrimp aquaculture using remote sensing data: A case study in the Giao Thuy District, Vietnam. Int. J. Remote Sens 2006, 27, 1491–1510, doi:10.1080/01431160500406888.
[36]
H？lbling, D.; Füreder, P.; Antolini, F.; Cigna, F.; Casagli, N.; Lang, S. A semi-automated object-based approach for landslide detection validated by persistent scatterer interferometry measures and landslide inventories. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 1310–1336, doi:10.3390/rs4051310.
[37]
Polychronaki, A.; Gitas, I.Z. Burned area mapping in Greece using SPOT-4 HRVIR images and object-based image analysis. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 424–438, doi:10.3390/rs4020424.
[38]
Polychronaki, A.; Gitas, I.Z. The development of an operational procedure for burned-area mapping using object-based classification and ASTER imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens 2010, 31, 1113–1120, doi:10.1080/01431160903334497.
[39]
Dupuy, S.; Barbe, E.; Balestrat, M. An object-based image analysis method for monitoring land conversion by artificial sprawl use of RapidEye and IRS data. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 404–423, doi:10.3390/rs4020404.
[40]
Lamonaca, A.; Corona, P.; Barbati, A. Exploring forest structural complexity by multi-scale segmentation of VHR imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 2839–2849, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.017.
[41]
Conchedda, G.; Durieux, L.; Mayaux, P. An object-based method for mapping and change analysis in mangrove ecosystems. ISPRS J. Photogramm 2008, 63, 578–589, doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.04.002.
[42]
Wang, L.; Sousa, W.P.; Gong, P. Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with IKONOS imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens 2004, 25, 5655–5668, doi:10.1080/014311602331291215.
[43]
Heumann, B.W. An object-based classification of mangroves using a hybrid decision tree—Support vector machine approach. Remote Sens 2011, 3, 2440–2460, doi:10.3390/rs3112440.
[44]
Myint, S.W.; Giri, C.P.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Z.; Gillette, S.C. Identifying mangrove species and their surrounding land use and land cover classes using an object-oriented approach with a lacunarity spatial measure. GIScience Remote Sens 2008, 45, 188–208, doi:10.2747/1548-1603.45.2.188.
[45]
Hay, G.J.; Castilla, G.; Wulder, M.A.; Ruiz, J.R. An automated object-based approach for the multiscale image segmentation of forest scenes. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf 2005, 7, 339–359, doi:10.1016/j.jag.2005.06.005.
[46]
Kuenzer, C.; Campbell, I.; Roch, M.; Leinenkugel, P.; Vo, Q.T.; Dech, S. Understanding the impacts of hydropower developments in the context of upstream-downstream relations in the Mekong River Basin. Sustainability Science 2012, 11, 1–20.
[47]
Clough, B.; Tan, D.T.; Phuong, D.X.; Buu, D.C. Canopy leaf area index and litter fall in stands of the mangrove Rhizophora apiculata of different age in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Aquat. Bot 2000, 66, 311–320, doi:10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00081-9.
[48]
Leinenkugel, P.; Esch, T.; Kuenzer, C. Settlement detection and impervious surface estimation in the Mekong Delta using optical and SAR remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ 2011, 115, 3007–3019, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.004.
[49]
Evers, H.-D.; Benedikter, S. Strategic Group Formation in the Mekong Delta—The Development of a Modern Hydraulic Society. In ZEF Working Paper Series No 35; Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn: Bonn, Germany, 2009.
[50]
Gebhardt, S.; Huth, J.; Nguyen, L.D.; Kuenzer, C. A comparison of TerraSAR-X Quadpol backscattering with RapidEye multispectral vegetation indices over rice fields in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Int. J. Remote Sens 2012, 33, 37–41.
[51]
Goverment of Vietnam General Statistics Office. Available online: www.gso.gov.vn (accessed on 20 August 2012).
[52]
Corps, C. Case Study 2: Mangrove Conservation vs. Shrimp Farming in Thailand. 2007, pp. 1–4. Available online: http://vancouveraccord.org/resources (accessed on 20 August 2012).
[53]
Lebel, L.; Tri, N.H.; Saengnoree, A.; Pasong, S.; Buatama, U.; Thoa, L.K. Industrial transformation and shrimp aquaculture in Thailand and Vietnam: pathways to ecological, social, and economic sustainability? Ambio 2002, 31, 311–23. 12174602
[54]
Government of Vietnam. Mangrove Forest Area. Available online: www.kiemlam.org.vn (accessed on 25 June 2011).
[55]
Kovacs, J.M.; Flores-verdugo, F.; Wang, J.; Aspden, L.P. Estimating leaf area index of a degraded mangrove forest using high spatial resolution satellite data. Aquat. Bot 2004, 80, 13–22, doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.06.001.
[56]
Vaiphasa, C.; Ongsomwang, S.; Vaiphasa, T.; Skidmore, A.K. Tropical mangrove species discrimination using hyperspectral data: A laboratory study. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci 2005, 65, 371–379, doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.06.014.
[57]
Christensen, S.M.; Tarp, P.; Hjorts？, C.N. Mangrove forest management planning in coastal buffer and conservation zones, Vietnam: A multimethodological approach incorporating multiple stakeholders. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2008, 51, 712–726, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.06.014. Goverment of Vietnam. The Rule for Land Use and Natural Resource Utilization Based on the Decision No. 116/1999/QD-TTg of 3 March 1999 for Reforestation of Mangrove Forest in Ca Mau, Bac Lieu, Soc Trang and Tra Vinh Provinces. 1999; pp. 3–4. Available online: http://vbqppl.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/Lists/Vn%20bn%20php%20lut/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=5538 (accessed on 25 June 2011).
[58]
Richter, R.; Schl？pfer, D. Atmospheric/Topographic Correction for Satellite Imagery. DLR Report DLR-IB 565-02/11;; DLR: Wessling, Germany, 2011; p. 202.
[59]
eCognition 8.7 Image Analysis Software. Trimble: Munich, Germany. Available online: http://www.ecognition.com/ (accessed on 25 June 2011).
[60]
Baatz, M.; Benz, U.; Dehghani, S.; Heynen, M.; Astrid, H.; Hofmann, P.; Lingenfelder, I.; Mimler, M.; Sohlbach, M.; Weber, M.; Willhauck, G. User Guide 4—Introducing Ecognition Elements, 2004. Available online: www.gis.unbc.ca/help/software/ecognition4/ELuserguide.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2011).
[61]
Baatz, M.; Sch？pe, A. Multiresolution Segmentation: An Optimization Approach for High Quality Multi-Scale Image Segmentation. In Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII: Beitr？ge zum AGIT-Symposium Salzburg 2000 (German Edition); Strobl, J., Blaschke, T., Griesebner, G., Eds.; Wichmann-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 12–23.
[62]
Congalton, R.; Green, K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; p. 183.
[63]
Hansen, M.C.; Townshend, J.R.G.; DeFries, R.S.; Carroll, M. Estimation of tree cover using MODIS data at global, continental and regional/local scales. Int. J. Remote Sens 2005, 26, 4359–4380, doi:10.1080/01431160500113435.
[64]
Montesano, P.M.; Nelson, R.; Sun, G.; Margolis, H.; Kerber, a.; Ranson, K.J. MODIS tree cover validation for the circumpolar taiga–tundra transition zone. Remote Sens. Environ 2009, 113, 2130–2141, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.05.021.
[65]
Ranson, K.J.; Montesano, P.M.; Nelson, R. Object-based mapping of the circumpolar taiga–tundra ecotone with MODIS tree cover. Remote Sens. Environ 2011, 115, 3670–3680, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.006.
