The performance of a new algorithm for binary snow cover monitoring based on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images at 250 m resolution is validated using snow cover maps (SCA) based on Landsat 7 ETM+ images and in situ snow depth measurements from ground stations in selected test sites in Central Europe. The advantages of the proposed algorithm are the improved ground resolution of 250 m and the near real-time availability with respect to the 500 m standard National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) MODIS snow products (MOD10 and MYD10). It allows a more accurate snow cover monitoring at a local scale, especially in mountainous areas characterized by large landscape heterogeneity. The near real-time delivery makes the product valuable as input for hydrological models, e.g., for flood forecast. A comparison to sixteen snow cover maps derived from Landsat ETM/ETM+ showed an overall accuracy of 88.1%, which increases to 93.6% in areas outside of forests. A comparison of the SCA derived from the proposed algorithm with standard MODIS products, MYD10 and MOD10, indicates an agreement of around 85.4% with major discrepancies in forested areas. The validation of MODIS snow cover maps with 148 in situ snow depth measurements shows an accuracy ranging from 94% to around 82%, where the lowest accuracies is found in very rugged terrain restricted to in situ stations along north facing slopes, which lie in shadow in winter during the early morning acquisition.
References
[1]
Dozier, J.; Painter, T.H. Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing of alpine snow properties. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci 2004, 32, 465–494.
[2]
Hall, D.K.; Riggs, G.; Salomonson, V.V.; Di Girolamo, N.E.; Bayr, K.J. MODIS snow-cover products. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 83, 181–194.
[3]
Wang, X.; Xie, H.; Liang, T. Evaluation of MODIS snow cover and cloud mask and its application in Northern Xinjiang, China. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 1497–1513.
[4]
Hall, D.K.; Riggs, G.A. Accuracy assessment of the MODIS snow-cover products. Hydrol. Process 2007, 21, 1534–1547.
[5]
Klein, A.G.; Barnett, A. Validation of daily MODIS snow maps of the Upper Rio Grande River Basin for the 2000–2001 snow year. Remote Sens. Environ 2003, 86, 162–176.
[6]
Liang, T.G.; Huang, X.D.; Wu, C.X.; Liu, X.Y.; Li, W.L.; Guo, Z.G. An application of MODIS data to snow cover monitoring in a pastoral area: A case study in Northern Xinjiang, China. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 514–1526.
[7]
Maurer, E.P.; Rhoads, J.D.; Dubayah, R.O.; Lettenmaier, D.P. Evaluation of the snow covered area data product from MODIS. Hydrol. Process 2003, 17, 59–71.
[8]
Zhou, X.; Xie, H.; Hendrickx, M.H.J. Statistical evaluation of remotely sensed snow-cover products with constraints from stream flow and SNOTEL measurements. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 94, 214–231.
[9]
Dozier, J.; Painter, T.H. Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing of alpine snow properties. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci 2004, 32, 465–494.
[10]
Hall, D.K.; Foster, J.L.; Verbyla, D.L.; Klein, A.G.; Benson, C.S. Assessment of snow-cover mapping accuracy in a variety of vegetation-cover densities in central Alaska. Remote Sens. Environ 1998, 66, 129–137.
[11]
Tong, J.; D'ery, S.J.; Jackson, P.L. Topographic control of snow distribution in an alpine watershed of western Canada inferred from spatially-filtered MODIS snow products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci 2009, 13, 319–326.
[12]
Tekeli, A.E.; Akyürek, Z.; ？orman, A.A.; ？ensoy, A.; ？orman, A.ü. Using MODIS snow cover maps in modeling snowmelt runoff process in the eastern part of Turkey. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 97, 216–230.
[13]
Simic, A.; Fernandes, R.; Brown, R.; Romanov, P.; Park, W. Validation of VEGETATION, MODIS, and GOES+SSM/I snow cover products over Canada based on surface snow depth observations. Hydrol. Process 2004, 18, 1089–1104.
[14]
Parajka, J.; Bl？schl, G. Validation of MODIS snow cover images over Austria. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci 2006, 10, 679–689.
[15]
Parajka, J.; Bl？schl, G. Spatio-temporal combination of MODIS images—Potential for snow cover mapping. Water Resour. Res 2008, 44, W03406.
[16]
Sirguey, P.; Mathieu, R.; Arnaud, Y. Subpixel monitoring of the seasonal snow cover with MODIS at 250 m spatial resolution in the Southern Alps of New Zealand: Methodology and accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ 2009, 113, 160–181.
[17]
Salomonson, V.V.; Appel, I. Development of the Aqua MODIS NDSI fractional snow cover algorithm and validation results. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2006, 44, 1747–1756.
[18]
Notarnicola, C.; Duguay, M.; Moelg, N.; Schellenberger, T.; Tetzlaff, A.; Monsorno, R.; Costa, A.; Steurer, C.; Zebisch, M. Snow cover maps from MODIS images at 250 m resolution-Part 1: Algorithm description. Remote Sens 2013, 5, 110–126.
[19]
Huesler, F.; Jonas, T.; Wunderle, S.; Albrecht, S. Validation of a modified snow cover retrieval algorithm from historical 1-km AVHRR data over the European Alps. Remote Sens. Environ 2012, 121, 497–515.
[20]
Siljamo, N.; Hyvearinen, O. New Geostationary SatelliteBased Snow-Cover Algorithm. J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim 2011, 50, 1275–1290.
[21]
Rastner, P.; Irsara, L.; Schellenberger, T.; Della Chiesa, S.; Bertoldi, G.; Endrizzi, S.; Notarnicola, C.; Steurer, C.; Zebisch, M. Snow Cover Monitoring and Modelling in the Alps Using Multi Temporal MODIS Data. Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, AB, Canada, 28 September–3 October 2009.
[22]
Hall, D.K.; Riggs, G.A.; Salomonson, V.V. Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sens. Environ 1995, 54, 127–140.
[23]
Parajka, J.; Holko, L.; Kostka, Z.; Bl？schl, G. MODIS snow cover mapping accuracy in small mountain catchment—Comparison between open and forest sites. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci 2012, 16, 2365–2377.
[24]
Klein, A.G.; Hall, D.K.; Riggs, G.A. Improving snow-cover mapping in forests through the use of a canopy reflectance model. Hydrol. Process 1998, 12, 1723–1744.
[25]
Parajka, J.; Bl？schl, G. MODIS-based Snow Cover Products, Validation, and Hydrologic Applications. In Multiscale Hydrologic Remote Sensing Perspectives and Applications; Chang, Y., Ni-Bin, H., Eds.; CRC Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 185–212.
[26]
Deutscher Wetterdienst. Available online: www.dwd.de (accessed on 1 February 2012).
[27]
Lawinenwarndienst Nieder？sterreich. Available online: http://lawinenwarndienst-niederoesterreich.at (accessed on 1 February 2012).
[28]
Autonomous Provinz Bozen Südtirol/Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano Alto Adige-Lawinen. Available online: www.provinz.bz.it/lawinen/ (accessed on 1 February 2012).
[29]
Slovakian Avalanche Centre. Available online: www.laviny.sk/ (accessed on 1 February 2012).
[30]
Thirrel, G.; Notarnicola, C.; Kalas, M.; Zebisch, M.; Schellenberger, T.; Tetzlaff, A.; Duguay, M.; M？lg, N.; Burek, P.; de Roo, A. Assessing the quality of a real-time snow cover area product for hydrological applications. Remote Sens. Environ 2012, 127, 271–287.
[31]
Tucker, C.J.; Yager, K.A. Ten years of MODIS in space: Lessons learned and future perspectives. It. J. Remote Sens 2011, 43, 7–18.
