This study assessed characteristics of publishers who published 2010 open access (OA) journals indexed in Scopus. Publishers were categorized into six types; professional, society, university, scholar/researcher, government, and other organizations. Type of publisher was broken down by number of journals/articles published in 2010, funding model, location, discipline and whether the journal was born or converted to OA. Universities and societies accounted for 50% of the journals and 43% of the articles published. Professional publisher accounted for a third of the journals and 42% of the articles. With the exception of professional and scholar/researcher publishers, most journals were originally subscription journals that made at least their digital version freely available. Arts, humanities and social science journals are largely published by societies and universities outside the major publishing countries. Professional OA publishing is most common in biomedicine, mathematics, the sciences and engineering. Approximately a quarter of the journals are hosted on national/international platforms, in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia largely published by universities and societies without the need for publishing fees. This type of collaboration between governments, universities and/or societies may be an effective means of expanding open access publications.
References
[1]
Suber, P. Open Access Overview. Available online: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm (accessed 23 April 2012).
[2]
Laakso, M.; Bj?rk, B.-C. Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Med. 2012, 10, 124, doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.
[3]
Butler, D. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature 2013, 495, 433–435, doi:10.1038/495433a.
[4]
Kolota, G. Scientific Articles Accepted (Personal Checks, Too). New York Times, 7 April 2013. Available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (access on 24 April 2013).
[5]
Anderson, K. Does Open Access Tackle, Perpetuate, or Exacerbate the Matthew Effect? Scholarly Kitchen, 2012. Available online: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/10/04/does-open-access-tackle-perpetuate-or-exacerbate-the-matthew-effect/ (accessed on 10 April 2013).
[6]
Solomon, D.J.; Laakso, M.; Bj?rk, B.-C. A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. J. Informetr. 2013, 7, 642–650, doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.008.
[7]
K?hler, O. Combining peer review and metrics to assess journals for inclusion in Scopus. Learn. Publ. 2010, 23, 336–346, doi:10.1087/20100411.
[8]
SCIMago SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Available online: http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=0&area=0&year=2011&country=&order=sjr&page=0&min=0&min_type=cd&out=xls (accessed on 10 February 2013).
[9]
What does Scopus Cover? Available online: http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/scopus-in-detail/facts (accessed on 10 April 2013).
[10]
The Directory of Open Access Journals—Selection Criteria. Available online: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=loadTempl&templ=about&uiLanguage=en#criteria (accessed on 10 April 2013).
[11]
The Directory of Open Access Journal Metadata. Available online: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=csv (accessed on 10 April 2013).
[12]
Scientific Electronic Library Online. Available online: http://www.scielo.org/php/index.php?lang=en (accessed on 10 April 2013).
[13]
Bj?rk, B.-C.; Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Paetau, P. Anatomy of green open access. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2013. in press.
[14]
First results of the SOAP project. Open access publishing in 2010. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.0506 (accessed on 24 April 2013).
[15]
About the journal. Available online: http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/dnares/about.html (accessed on 24 April 2013).