In this paper we outline the reasons why we believe a reliance on the use of proprietary computer software and proprietary file formats in scientific publication have negative implications for the conduct and reporting of science. There is increasing awareness and interest in the scientific community about the benefits offered by free and open source software. We discuss the present state of scientific publishing and the merits of advocating for a wider adoption of open standards in science, particularly where it concerns the publishing process.
References
[1]
Tchantchaleishvili, V.; Schmitto, J. Preparing a scientific manuscript in Linux: Today’s possibilities and limitations. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 434, doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-434.
[2]
International Journal of Clinical Practice—Journal Information. Available online: https://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ijcp_enhanced/submit.asp (accessed on 4 November 2012).
[3]
Kesan, J.; Shah, R. Open Standards in Electronic Governance: Promises and Pitfalls. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV ’08, Cairo, Egypt, 1–4 December 2008; pp. 179–182.
[4]
Stallman, R. We Can Put an End to Word Attachments. Available online: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html (accessed on 4 November 2012).
[5]
Griffin, B. An Introduction to Viruses and Malicious Code, Part One: Overview | Symantec Connect Community. Available online: http://www.symantec.com/connect/articles/introduction-viruses-and-malicious-code-part-one-overview (accessed on 4 November 2012).
[6]
Goldberg, J. MS-Word is {Not} a document exchange format. Available online: http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/no-word/attach.html (accessed on 4 November 2012).
[7]
Steingold, S. No to Proprietary Binary Data Formats. Available online: http://www.podval.org/~sds/data.html (accessed on 4 November 2012).
[8]
Free Software Foundation What is free software? Available online: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html (accessed on 20 May 2013).
[9]
Li, D.; Parkhurst, D.J. openEyes: An open-hardware open-source system for low-cost eye tracking. J. Modern Opt. 2006, 53, 1295–1311, doi:10.1080/09500340600619072.
[10]
Liu, W.; Winfield, A.F.T. Open-hardware e-puck Linux extension board for experimental swarm robotics research. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2011, 35, 60–67, doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2010.08.002.
[11]
Hoffman, F.; Hargrove, W. Parallel computing with Linux. Crossroads 1999, 6, 23–27.
[12]
Valiev, M.; Bylaska, E.J.; Govind, N.; Kowalski, K.; Straatsma, T.P.; van Dam, H.J.J.; Wang, D.; Nieplocha, J.; Apra, E.; Windus, T.L.; et al. NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2010, 181, 1477–1489.
[13]
Boyd-Wickizer, S.; Clements, A.T.; Mao, Y.; Pesterev, A.; Kaashoek, M.F.; Morris, R.T.; Zeldovich, N. An Analysis of Linux Scalability to Many Cores. MIT web domain, 2010.
[14]
Kshetri, N. Increasing Returns and the Diffusion of Linux in China; Social Science Research Network: Rochester, NY, USA, 2007.
[15]
Bahyl, V.; Chardi, B.; van Eldik, J.; Fuchs, U.; Kleinwort, T.; Murth, M.; Smith, T. Installing, Running and Maintaining Large Linux Clusters at CERN. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0306058 (accessed on 21 June 2013).
[16]
CERN To all users of mathematics tools at CERN. Available online: http://mathtools.web.cern.ch/node/13 (accessed on 20 May 2013).
[17]
Nakakoji, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nishinaka, Y.; Kishida, K.; Ye, Y. Evolution Patterns of Open-Source Software Systems and Communities. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution; IWPSE ’02, Orlando, FL, USA, 19–20 May 2002; pp. 76–85.
[18]
Weir, R. OpenDocument format: The standard for office documents. IEEE Internet Comput. 2009, 13, 83–87, doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.42.
