The computer modelling and simulation of wastewater treatment plant and their specific technologies, such as membrane bioreactors (MBRs), are becoming increasingly useful to consultant engineers when designing, upgrading, retrofitting, operating and controlling these plant. This research uses traditional phenomenological mechanistic models based on MBR filtration and biochemical processes to measure the effectiveness of alternative and novel time series models based upon input–output system identification methods. Both model types are calibrated and validated using similar plant layouts and data sets derived for this purpose. Results prove that although both approaches have their advantages, they also have specific disadvantages as well. In conclusion, the MBR plant designer and/or operator who wishes to use good quality, calibrated models to gain a better understanding of their process, should carefully consider which model type is selected based upon on what their initial modelling objectives are. Each situation usually proves unique.
References
[1]
Duclos-Orsello, C.; Li, W.; Ho, C. A three mechanism model to describe fouling of microfiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci.?2006, 280, 856–866, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.005.
[2]
Hermia, J. Constant pressure blocking filtration law: Application to power law non-Newtonian fluids. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng.?1982, 60, 183–187.
[3]
Paul, P.; Ulanicki, B.; Lueder, F. Development of a Microfiltration Fouling Model to be Linked to the Biology of an MBR System. In Proceedings of the 7th Aachen Membranes and Water Conference, Aachen, Germany, 30–31 October 2007.
[4]
Drews, A.; Mante, J.; Iversen, V.; Vocks, M.; Lesjean, B.; Kraume, M. Does fouling in MBRs depend on SMP? Desalination?2008, 231, 141–149, doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.042.
[5]
Yoo, C.K.; Vanrolleghem, P.A.; In-Beum, L. Nonlinear modeling and adaptive monitoring with fuzzy and multivariate statistical methods in biological wastewater treatment plants. J. Biotechnol.?2003, 105, 135–163, doi:10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00168-8. 14511916
[6]
Ljung, L. System Identification—Theory for the User, 2nd ed. ed.; PTR Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999.
[7]
Berthouex, P.M.; Hunter, W.G.; Pallesen, L.; Shih, C.Y. Dynamic behavior of an activated sludge plant. Water Res.?1978, 12, 957–972, doi:10.1016/0043-1354(78)90079-9.
[8]
Debelak, K.A.; Sims, C.A. Stochastic modeling of an industrial activated sludge process. Water Res.?1981, 15, 1173–1183, doi:10.1016/0043-1354(81)90092-0.
[9]
Christodoulatos, C.; Vaccari, D.A. Correlations of performance for activated sludge using multiple regression with autocorrelation. Water Res.?1993, 27, 51–62, doi:10.1016/0043-1354(93)90194-M.
[10]
Chen, H.; Maciejowski, J.M. A New Subspace Identification Method for Bilinear Systems; Technical Report for CUED/F-INFENG/TR.357; University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 1999.