全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-16

Keywords: Animal, Biological complexity, Ethics, Evolution, Law, Nuremberg code, Species variation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We review the history of these requirements and contrast what was known via science about animal models then with what is known now. We further analyze the predictive value of animal models when used as test subjects for human response to drugs and disease. We explore the use of animals for models in toxicity testing as an example of the problem with using animal models.We conclude that the requirements for animal testing found in the Nuremberg Code were based on scientifically outdated principles, compromised by people with a vested interest in animal experimentation, serve no useful function, increase the cost of drug development, and prevent otherwise safe and efficacious drugs and therapies from being implemented.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133