THE STYLISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A COMMENTARY BELONGING TO OLD ANATOLIAN TURKISH ESK ANADOLU TüRK ES NE A T B R TEFS R N üSL P ZELL KLER

Literary style can show variaties in different writing styles and also in the same writing styles . Commentaries although their limits are more explicit explicandum comparing other styles can show variability regarding to glassator. In the era of Turkey Turkish there were written suras, translations of Quran and commentaries. The guiding spirit of these commentaries seem as the commentary of Ebu’l-Leys esSemerkand . In our study Uveys bin Hoca Osman’s Commentary of Amme Part which was written at that time will be examined with readings of other commentaries which were blonged to the evolving era as a translation of commentary of Semerkand . At the end of this examination there will be tried to show writing style features and differences of Uveys and his contributions to commentary statements. In this regard there will be semtinized what the writer can add to the writing style of the commentary personally apart from the lingo of Quran and for which reason the writer might does that üsl p, farkl yaz türlerinde de i mekle birlikte ayn yaz türü i inde de de i ebilir. Tefsirler de s n rlar di er türlere g re daha belirgin bir ifade bi imi olmas na ra men müfessire g re de i kenlik g sterebilmektedir. Eski Anadolu Türk esi d neminde yayg n olarak s re, Kuran tercümeleri ve tefsirler yaz lm t r. Bu tefsirlerin esin kayna Ebu’l-Leys es-Semerkand ’nin tefsiri olarak g rülmektedir. al mam zda d neme ait di er tefsirlerden de okumalar yap larak Semerkand tefsirinin bir tercümesi olarak geli en üveys bin Hoca Osman’ n Amme Cüzü Tefsiri incelenecektir. Bu inceleme sonunda üveys’in üsl p zellikleri ve farkl l klar , tefsir anlat m na katk lar g sterilmeye al lacakt r. Bu ba lamda tefsir yaz m ndaki üsl ba Kuran dili d nda yazar n ki isel olarak neler katabildi i, bunu ne ama la yapm olabilece i irdelenecektir.