Some general theorems on differential subordinations of some functionals connected with arithmetic and geometric means related to a sector are proved. These results unify a number of well known results concerning inclusion relation between the classes of analytic functions built with using arithmetic and geometric means. 1. Introduction For let Let . Let the functions and be analytic in the unit disc . A function is called subordinate to written , if is univalent in and . Let be a domain in and be an analytic function, and let be a function analytic in with and be a function analytic and univalent in . The function is said to satisfy the first-order differential subordination if The general theory of the differential subordinations has been studied intensively by many authors. A survey of this theory can by found in the monograph by Miller and Mocanu [1]. For let It is clear that maps univalently onto the sector of the angle symmetrical with respect to the real axis with the vertex at the origin. In this paper we are interested in the following problem referring to (1.1) to find the constant so that to the following relation is true: with suitable assumptions on function and constants For selected parameters the theorems presented here reduce to the well-known theorems proved by various authors. Particularly, results of this type can be applied to examine inclusion relation between subclasses of analytic functions defined with using arithmetic or geometric means of some functionals, for example, the class of -convex functions or -starlike functions. The lemma below that slightly generalizes a lemma proved by Miller and Mocanu [2] will be required in our investigation. Lemma 1.1 (see [2]). Let be a function analytic and univalent on , injective on and . Let be analytic in . Suppose that there exists a point such that and If and exists, then there exists an for which 2. Main Results In the first theorem which follows directly from Theorem 2.2 [3] we prove that Let us start with the following definition. Definition 2.1 (see [3]). Let and be a function analytic in domain . By will be denoted the class of functions analytic in with and such that the function is well defined in . Theorem 2.2 (see [3]). Let a convex function such that a function analytic in a domain such that , and for . If and then Definition 2.3. Let and By will be denoted the class of functions analytic in of the form (1.4) such that the function is well defined in . Remark 2.4. (1) Setting we see that (2) For each as in Definition 2.3 the class is nonempty. To see this take for
References
[1]
S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Differential Subordinations Theory, Theory and Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
[2]
S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, “Second order differential inequalities in the complex plane,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 289–305, 1978.
[3]
A. Lecko, “On differential subordinations and Inclusion relation between classes of analytic functions,” Complex Variables, vol. 40, pp. 371–385, 2000.
[4]
A. Lecko, “Some differential subordinations depended on real parameters,” in Proceeding of the 5th Environment and Mathematics Conference, pp. 77–88, KUL, Lublin, Poland, 1999.
[5]
A. Lecko, M. Lecko, M. Nunokawa, and S. Owa, “Differential subordinations and convex functions related to a sector,” Mathematica(Cluj), vol. 40(63), no. 2, pp. 197–205, 1998.
[6]
Y. C. Kim and A. Lecko, “Univalence of certain integral operators and differential subordinations,” Mathematica(Cluj), vol. 43(66), no. 1, pp. 89–102, 2001.
[7]
P.T. Mocanu, “Some simple criteria for starlikeness and convexity,” Libertas Math, vol. 13, pp. 27–40, 1993.
[8]
S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, “Marx-Strohh？acker differential subordinations systems,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 99, pp. 527–534, 1987.
[9]
A. Lecko, “On differential subordinations connected with convex functions related to a sector,” Kyungpook Mathematical Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 243–350, 1999.
[10]
P. T. Mocanu, “Alpha-convex integral operator and strongly starlike functions,” Studia Universitatis Babe？ Bolyai, Mathematica, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 18–24, 1989.
[11]
M. Nunokawa, “On the order of strongly starlikeness of strongly convex functions,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, vol. 69, no. 7, 1993.
[12]
M. Nunokawa and D. K. Thomas, “On convex and starlike functions in a sector,” Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series A, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 363–368, 1996.
[13]
R. Singh and S. Singh, “Convolution properties of a class of starlike functions,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 106, pp. 145–152, 1989.
[14]
Y. Dinggong, “Properties of a class of analytic functions,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 41, pp. 371–381, 1995.
[15]
P. T. Mocanu, “Une propriéte de convexité dans la représentalion conforme,” Mathematica (Cluj), vol. 11, no. 34, pp. 127–134, 1969.
[16]
D. A. Brannan and W. E. Kirwan, “On some classes of bounded univalent functions,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 431–443, 1969.
[17]
J. Stankiewicz, “On a family of starlike functions,” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio A, vol. 22–24, pp. 175–181, 1968–70.
[18]
J. Stankiewicz, “Quelques problèmes extrémaux dans les classes des fonctions -angulairement ètoilées,” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio A, vol. 20, pp. 59–75, 1966.
[19]
J. Marjono and D. K. Thomas, “Subordination on δ-convex functions in a sector,” Honam Math Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2001.
[20]
S. Kanas, A. Lecko, and J. Stankiewicz, “On some classes of the regular functions,” Resov, vol. 38, pp. 43–52, 1987.
[21]
Z. Lewandowski, S. Miller, and E. Zlotkiewicz, “Gamma-starlike functions,” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio A, vol. 28, pp. 53–58, 1974.
[22]
M. Darus and D. K. Thomas, “ -logarithmically convex functions,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1049–1059, 1998.
[23]
Y. Komatu, “On analytic prolongation of a family of operators,” Mathematica(Cluj), vol. 32, no. 55, pp. 141–145, 1990.
[24]
S. Rusheweyh, “New criteria for univalent functions,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 49, pp. 109–115, 1975.
