Although the main goal of traditional farming is to produce food, it can play an important role in conservation of genetic resources. This paper reports a study, which explored the diversity of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars grown by farmers and their preferences for different cultivars. The possibilities of using farms as sites for conserving genetic resources are discussed. The data for the study were collected from personal interviews that involved randomly selected date palm farmers in the Northern State and River Nile State, Sudan. Ordered and binary logit models were used to account for possible factors influencing the diversity of cultivars grown by farmers and preferences for different cultivars, respectively. The results showed that the cultivars grown by the respondents vary widely. On average, the Northern State respondents grew twice the number of cultivars as those in the River Nile State. Of all the date palm cultivars, the Barakawi was the most preferred. The diversity of the cultivars grown by the respondents and their preferences were mainly influenced by factors, such as farm location, drought, uses of date palm, years of farming experience, education, income from date palm and household size. The findings will help in designing a more sustainable date palm breeding program, as well as a genetic resources conservation strategy.
References
[1]
Hodel, D.R.; Pittenger, D.R. Studies on the establishment of date palm (Phoenix dactylylifera) offshoots. Part1. Observations on root development and leaf growth. Palms 2003, 47, 201–205.
[2]
Zaid, A. Date Palm Cultivation; FAO Plant Production and Protection, Food and Agriculture Organization; Paper No. 156; United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1999.
[3]
Al-Farsi, M.; Alasalvar, C.; Morris, A.; Barron, M.; Shahidi, F. Compositional and sensory characteristics of three native sundried date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties grown in Oman. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7586–7591.
[4]
Ishurd, O.; Kennedy, J.F. The anti-cancer activity of polysaccharide prepared from Libyan dates (Phoenix dactylifera L). Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 59, 531–535, doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.11.004.
[5]
Vayalill, P.K. Antioxidant and antimutagenic properties of aqueous extract of date fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L. Arecaceae). J. Agr. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 610–617.
[6]
Al-Shahib, W.; Marshall, R.J. The fruit of the date palm: It’s possible use as the best food for the future. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutri. 2003, 54, 247–259, doi:10.1080/09637480120091982.
[7]
El Hadrami, A.; Al-Khayri, J.M. Socioeconomic and traditional importance of date palm. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2012, 24, 371–385.
[8]
Chowdhury, M.S.H.; Halim, A.; Mohammed, N.; Haque, F.; Koike, M. Traditional utilization of wild date palm (Phoenix sylvestris) in rural Bangladesh: an approach to sustainable biodiversity management. J. Forestry Res. 2008, 19, 245–251, doi:10.1007/s11676-008-0036-1.
[9]
Vom Brocke, K.; Weltzien, E.; Christinck, A.; Presterl, T.; Geiger, H.H. Effects of farmers’ seed management on performance and adaptation of pearl millet in Rajasthan, India. Euphytica 2003, 130, 267–280, doi:10.1023/A:1022830925717.
[10]
Lacy, S.M.; Cleveland, D.A.; Soleri, D. Farmer choice of sorghum varieties in southern Mali. Hum. Ecol. 2006, 34, 331–353.
[11]
Simmonds, N.W.; Smart, J. Principles of Crop Improvement; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1999.
[12]
Smale, M. Economics Perspectives on Collaborative Plant Breeding for Conservation of Genetic Diversity on Farm. In Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice; Cleveland, D.A., Soleri, D., Eds.; CAB International: Oxon, UK, 2002.
[13]
Abdullahi, A.A. Adoption and Impact of Dry-season Dual-purpose Cowpea in the Nigerian Semiarid Region; CGIAR: Nairobi, Kenya, 2006. Available online: http://www.solutions-site.org (accessed on 12 March 2012).
[14]
Jarvis, D.; Meyer, L.; Klemick, H.; Guarino, L.; Smale, M.; Brown, A.H.D.; Sadiki, M.; Sthapit, B.; Hodgkin, T. Social, cultural and economic factors and crop genetic diversity. In A Training Guide for in-situ Conservation. On-Farm Version 1; Jarvis, D., Meyer, L., Klemick, H., Guarino, L., Smale, M., Brown, A.H.D., Sadiki, M., Sthapit, B., Hodgkin, T., Eds.; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, Italy, 2000.
[15]
Friis-Hansen, E.; Sthapit, B. Concepts and Rationale of Participatory Approaches to Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources. In Participatory Approaches to the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources; Friis-Hansen, E., Sthapit, B., Eds.; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, Italy, 2000.
[16]
Louette, D.; Charrier, A.; Berthaud, J. In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: Genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ. Bot. 1997, 51, 20–38.
[17]
Searchinger, T.; Heimlich, R.; Houghton, R.A.; Dong, F.; Elobeid, A.; Fabiosa, J.; Tokgoz, S.; Hayes, D.; Yu, T.H. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008, 319, 1238–1240.
[18]
Chapin, F.S.; Zavaleta, E.S.; Eviner, V.T.; Naylor, R.L.; Vitousek, P.M.; Reynolds, H.; Hooper, D.U.; Lavorel, S.; Sala, O.E.; Hobbie, S.E.; et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 2000, 405, 234–242.
[19]
World Resources Institute. Forest Clearing and Forest Cover in the Humid Tropical Forest Biome: 2000–2005; WRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[20]
Ezebilo, E.E. Nature Conservation in a Tropical Rainforest: Economics, Local Participation and Sustainability. PhD Thesis, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden, 2010.
[21]
Asrat, S.; Yesuf, M.; Carlsson, F.; Wale, E. Farmers’ preferences for crop variety traits: Lessons for on-farm conservation and technology adoption. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2394–2401, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.006.
[22]
Ceccarelli, S.; Grando, S. Plant Breeding with Farmers Requires Testing the Assumptions of Conventional Plant Breeding: Lessons from the ICARDA Barley Program. In Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice; Cleveland, D.A., Soleri, D., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 2002.
[23]
Ezebilo, E.E. Conservation of a leafy vegetable important for communities in the Nigerian rainforest. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 1660–1665, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.044.
[24]
Elshibli, S.; Korpelainen, H. Microsatellite markers reveal high genetic diversity in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) germplasm from Sudan. Genetica 2008, 134, 251–260.
[25]
Elsafi, M. Study on the On-farm Diversity of Local Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Genetic Resources in Northern Region of Sudan. MSc Thesis, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden, 2012.
[26]
Osman, A.M.A. Development of Date Palm Culture in Republic of Sudan. Paper presented at a Workshop on Date Palm Culture and Dates Production in Republic of Sudan. Date Palm Research and Development Network: Khartoum, Sudan. 17–22 August 2001.
[27]
Yousif, A.A. The Date Palm; Khartoum University Press: Khartoum, Sudan, 1995; Volume 1, pp. 273–280.
[28]
Baballa, A.M. The Characterization of Dry Date Palm in the River Nile State. MSc Thesis, University of Wadi Elneel, Wadi Elneel, Sudan, 2002.
[29]
Osman, A.M.A.; Boulos, N.N. Evaluation of some Sudanese date cultivars. Acta Hortic. 1978, 84, 185–190.
[30]
Elshibli, S.; Korpelainen, H. Biodiversity of date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in Sudan: chemical, morphological and DNA polymorphisms of selected cultivars. PGRU 2009, 7, 194–203.
[31]
Casavant, K.L.; Infanger, C.L.; Bridges, D.E. Agricultural Economics and Management; Prentice-Hall International Ltd.: London, UK, 1999.
[32]
Anderson, J.R.; Dillon, J.L. Risk Analysis in Dryland Farming Systems; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1992.
[33]
McElvey, R.; Zavoina, W.A. Statistical model for the analysis of ordered level dependent variables. J. Math. Sociol. 1975, 4, 102–120.
[34]
McCullagh, P. Regression models for ordered data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1980, 42, 109–142.
[35]
Harrell, F.E., Jr. Regression Modelling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2003.
[38]
Chatterjee, S.; Price, B. Regression Analysis by Example; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991.
[39]
Wossink, G.A.A.; van Wenum, J.H. Biodiversity conservation by farmers: analysis of actual and contingent participation. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2003, 30, 461–485, doi:10.1093/erae/30.4.461.
[40]
Ezebilo, E.E. Local participation in forest and biodiversity conservation in a Nigerian rain forest. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 2011, 18, 42–47, doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.544389.
[41]
Zaid, A.; de Wet, P.F.; Djebri, M.; Oihabi, A. Diseases and Pests of Date Palm. In Date Palm Cultivation; Zaid, A., Ed.; Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations: Rome, 2002; pp. 227–242. FAO Plant Production and Protection, Paper No. 56.
[42]
Vodouhe, R.; Dansi, A.; Avohou, H.T.; Kpeki, B.; Azihou, F. Plant domestication and its contribution to in situ conservation of genetic resources in Benin. IJBC 2011, 3, 40–56.
[43]
United Nations Environmental Programme–UNEP. Natural Diseases and Desertification. In Sudan–Post–Conflict Environmental Assessment; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2007; pp. 56–69.
[44]
Ezebilo, E.E. Community forestry as perceived by local people around cross river national park, Nigeria. Environ. Manage. 2012, 49, 207–218, doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9765-6.
[45]
Layton, D.F.; Siikam？ki, J. Payments for ecosystem services programs: predicting landowner enrollment and opportunity cost using a beta-binomial model. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009, 44, 415–439, doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9293-5.
[46]
Ezebilo, E.E. Forest stakeholder participation in improving game habitat in Swedish forests. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1580–1595, doi:10.3390/su4071580.
