The transition to sustainability will be difficult. Environmental sustainability entails living within the Earth’s limits, yet the majority of scientific studies indicate a condition of overshoot. For mainstream economists sustainability means perpetuating economic growth. Consequently, environmental and economic sustainability are incompatible in the present institutional context. This paper seeks to develop a new theory of sustainability based upon historical and institutional contexts, the role of economic crises, as well as focusing upon energy quality and meaningful work. Mainstream economics, which emphasizes market self-regulation and economic growth, is not a good vehicle for a theory of sustainability. Better insights are to be found in the literature of heterodox political economy and political ecology. Political ecology is based upon the theory of monopoly capital. Monopoly capitalism exhibits a tendency towards stagnation, because the economic surplus cannot be absorbed adequately in the absence of system-wide waste. The Monthly Review School continues this tradition in the context of the metabolic rift, while the Capitalism, Nature and Socialism School develops the idea of a second contradiction of capitalism. The Social Structure of Accumulation school pursues the idea of long swings of economic activity based upon institutional structures that aid or inhibit capital accumulation.
References
[1]
Global Footprint Network Home Page. Available online: http://www.footprintnetwork.org (accessed on 20 April, 2012).
[2]
Klitgaard, K.; Krall, L. Ecological economics, degrowth and institutional change. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 84, 247–253, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.008.
[3]
Polanyi, K.; Arensberg, C.M.; Pearson, H.W. Trade and Market in Early Empires; Henry Regnery Company: Washington, DC, USA, 1971.
[4]
Caldwell, J.; Schindlmayr, T. Historical population estimates: Unraveling the consensus. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2002, 28, 183–204.
[5]
Cleveland, C.; Costanza, R.; Hall, C.; Kaufmann, R. Energy and the U.S. economy: A biophysical perspective. Science 1984, 225, 890–897.
[6]
Kunstler, J. The World Made by Hand; The Grove Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[7]
Schor, J. Plenitude; The Penguin Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
[8]
Hall, C.; Klitgaard, K. Energy and the Wealth of Nations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[9]
Marx, K. Capital, Volume I; Penguin Books: London, UK, 1992.
[10]
Lazonick, W. Karl Marx and enclosures in England. Rev. Radic. Polit. Econ. 1972, 4, 1–32.
[11]
Baran, P.; Sweezy, P. Monopoly Capital; Monthly Review Press: New York, NY, USA, 1966.
[12]
Chamberlain, E. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1962.
[13]
Solow, R. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 1956, 70, 65–94, doi:10.2307/1884513.
[14]
Magdoff, H.; Sweezy, P. Stagnation and the Financial Explosion; Monthly Review Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987.
[15]
Sweezy, P.; Magdoff, H. The Irreversible Crisis; Monthly Review Press: New York, USA, 1988.
[16]
Foster, J.; Magdoff, F. The Great Financial Crisis; Monthly Review Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[17]
Bravreman, H. Labor and Monopoly Capital; Monthly Review Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974.
[18]
Marx, K. Capital; Penguin Books: London, UK, 1993; Volume III.
[19]
Foster, J. The Ecological Revolution; Monthly Review Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[20]
Burkett, P. Marxism and Ecological Economics; Haymarket Books: Chicago, IL, USA, 2009.
[21]
Magdoff, F.; Foster, J. What Every Environmentalists Needs to Know About Capitalism; Monthly Review Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
Odum, H.; Odum, E. A Prosperous Way Down; University Press of Colorado: Boulder, CO, USA, 2001.
[24]
O’Connor, J. The Fiscal Crisis of the State; St. Martin’s Press: New York, NY, USA, 1973.
[25]
O’Connor, J. Natural Causes; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[26]
Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation; The Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1944; p. 27.
[27]
Martinez-Alier, J. Environmental justice and economic degrowth: An alliance between two movements. Capitalism, Nature Socialism 2012, 23, 51–72, doi:10.1080/10455752.2011.648839.
[28]
Schwartzman, D. A critique of degrowth and its politics. Capitalism Nature Socialism 2012, 23, 121–125, doi:10.1080/10455752.2012.675241.
[29]
Gupta, A.J. Energy and material constraints concerning the rapid deployment of photovoltaic energy in the twenty-first century. Master Thesis, The State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, New York, NY, December 2011.
[30]
O’Hara, P. Growth and Development in the Global Political Economy; Routledge: London, UK, 2006.
[31]
Edwards, R. Contested Terrain; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1979.
[32]
Gordon, D.; Edwards, R.; Reich, M. Segmented Work, Divided Workers; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982.
[33]
Bowles, S.; Gordon, D.; Weisskopf, T. After the Wasteland; M.E. Sharpe: Armonk, NY, USA, 1990.
[34]
Wolfson, M.; Kotz, D.A. Reconceptualization of the Social Structure of Accumulation Theory. In Contemporary Capitalism and Its Crises; McDonough, T., Reich, M., Kotz, D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; Volume 3, p. 72.
[35]
Lippit, V. Social Structure of Accumulation Theory. In Contemporary Capitalism and Its Crises; McDonough, T., Reich, M., Kotz, D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; Volume 2, p. 45.
[36]
Kotz, D. The financial and economic crisis of 2008: A Systemic crisis of neoliberal capitalism. Rev. Radic. Polit. Econ. 2009, 41, 305–317, doi:10.1177/0486613409335093.
[37]
Li, M. Capitalism with a Zero Profit Rate: Limits To Growth And The Law Of The Tendency For The Rate Of Profit To Fall. In Growth and Crisis: Social Structure of Accumulation Theory and Analysis; McDonough, T., Reich, M., Kotz, D., Gonzalez-Perez, M., Eds.; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2006; pp. 380–402.
[38]
Foster, J. Capitalism and degrowth: An impossibility theorem. Mon. Rev. 2011, 62, 26–33.
