Revisión de dos instrumentos de simulación neurocognitiva y su utilidad en el contexto forense

Most of the accuracy in neuropsychological assessment depends that the instruments used are standardized, valid and reliable measures. However, malingering, exaggeration and poor effort are aspects that can interfere with the interpretation of the results. The aim of this review was to describe and analyze two instru-ments in the context of forensic neuropsychology that assess malingering of cognitive symptoms: Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and Victoria Symptoms Validity Test (VSVT). Several scientific databases and related books were searched non-exhaustively. The criterion for inclusion in this review was the use of test. We selected 68 documents, each one was analyzed based on the technical characteristics of the instruments. Review showed that the TOMM and VSVT are relevant instruments for assessing malingering and exaggeration of cognitive symptoms. These instruments have several evidence that support their psychometric proper-ties but also limitations and restrictions on their use.