全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

On the Choice of the Discount Rate and the Role of Financial Variables and Physical Parameters in Estimating the Levelized Cost of Energy

DOI: 10.3390/ijfs1030054

Keywords: discount rate, risk, levelized cost of energy, photovoltaics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The levelized cost of energy (LCOE) approach has become popular, especially in the field of renewable energy. We argue that when assessing levelized cost of energy, different rates should be used for borrowing and discount rates. We further argue that the risk-free rate should be used for discounting when assessing and comparing the cost of energy across different producers and technologies. Recent analyses used the same rate for borrowing and discounting, which leads to underestimation of the cost for risky borrowers and to distorted sensitivities of the cost to financial and non-financial factors. Specifically, it is shown that they may lead to gross underestimation of the importance of solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency when applied to photovoltaics. The importance of device efficiency is re-established under the treatment of the discount rate proposed here.

References

[1]  OOPEC. A Strategic Research Agenda for Photovoltaic Solar Energy Technology; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxemburg, Luxemburg, 2007.
[2]  Azzopardi, B.; Emmott, C.J.M.; Urbina, A.; Krebs, F.C.; Mutale, J.; Nelson, J. Economic assessment of solar electricity production from organic-based photovoltaic modules in a domestic environment. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3741–3753, doi:10.1039/c1ee01766g.
[3]  International Energy Agency. Medium-Term Oil and Gas Markets; IEA: Paris, France, 2011. Available online: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/mtogm2011_unsecured.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2013).
[4]  Canada oil Sands: Opportunities and Challenges to 2015. An Energy Market Assessment; Canada National Energy Board, Publications Office: Calgary, Canada, 2004. Available online: http://www.neb-one.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/nrgyrprt/lsnd/pprtntsndchllngs20152006/pprtntsndchllngs20152006-eng.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2013).
[5]  US Geological Survey (USGS), 2000. Available online: http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-060/index.html (accessed on 5 June 2013).
[6]  Darling, S.B.; You, F.; Veselka, T.; Velosa, A. Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3133–3139, doi:10.1039/c0ee00698j.
[7]  Branker, K.; Pathak, M.J.M.; Pearce, J.M. A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2011, 15, 4470–4482, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104.
[8]  Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2013; U.S. Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
[9]  Martinez-Cesena, E.A.; Azzopardi, B.; Mulate, J. Assessment of domestic photovoltaic systems based on real options theory. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2013, doi:10.1002/pip.2208.
[10]  Hull, J.C. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives; Prentice Hall: Toronto, Canada, 2009.
[11]  McIlveen-Wright, D.R.; Moglie, M.; Rezvani, S.; Huang, Y.; Anderson, M.; Redpath, D.; Dave, A.; Hewitt, N.J. A techno-economic analysis of biomass gasifiers integrated with high and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Energ. Res. 2011, 35, 1037–1047, doi:10.1002/er.1815.
[12]  Bj?rk, T. Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time; Oxford Finance Series; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[13]  Moore, L.M.; Post, H.N. Five years of operating experience at a large, utility-scale photovoltaic generating plant. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2008, 16, 249–259, doi:10.1002/pip.800.
[14]  Park, C.S. Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5th ed. ed.; Pearson Education: Boston, MA, USA, 2011.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133