|
Evaluation of contact heat thermal threshold testing for standardized assessment of cutaneous nociception in horses - comparison of different locations and environmental conditionsKeywords: Horse, Nociception, Pain, Contact heat, Environmental condition Abstract: Skin temperatures were significantly different during warm and cold ambient temperatures at all three locations, but remained constant over repeated stimulation. An obvious response to stimulation before reaching cut-out temperature could be detected most frequently at N and W in boxes during warm ambient temperatures. The most frequent type of reaction to thermal stimulation at the nostril was headshaking (64.6%), skin twitching at the withers (82.9%) and hoof withdrawal at the coronary band (79.2%).The outcome of thermal threshold testing depended on ambient temperature, stimulation site and environment. Best results with the WTT2 in horses were obtained at the nostrils or withers in a familiar environment at warm ambient temperatures.Repeatable and reliable tests for detection and quantification of analgesia are essential for development of effective analgesic protocols. Nociceptive threshold tests are standard models of nociceptive pain in laboratory animals [1]. Among different stimulation modalities heat stimuli are widely used in classic tests [2-4]. In horses, contact heat and radiant heat have been used as a quantifiable stimulus to determine temperature thresholds [5-8] or the latency between stimulation and response [9-12]. A thermode based system for determination of thermal nociceptive thresholds, initially designed and validated for use in cats [13], has been adapted for the use in horses [5-8]. When using such systems, definition of a clear cut end-point of stimulation, such as skin twitching, shaking or hoof withdrawal is crucial for reliable and repeatable determination of the nociceptive threshold [14]. Such behavioural end-points can be reflex related or may represent conscious perception of pain dependent on the stimulated body region, thereby, influencing the level of the response threshold. When working with large animals outside a controlled laboratory environment, detection of an expected end-point can be difficult because of a wide range of
|