Land use/land cover change has been attracting increasing attention in the field of global environmental change research because of its role in the social and ecological environment. To explore the ecological risk characteristics of land use change in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone of China, an eco-risk index was established in this study by the combination of a landscape disturbance index with a landscape fragmentation index. Spatial distribution and gradient difference of land use eco-risk are analyzed by using the methods of spatial autocorrelation and semivariance. Results show that ecological risk in the study area has a positive correlation, and there is a decreasing trend with the increase of grain size both in 1995 and 2005. Because the area of high eco-risk value increased from 1995 to 2005, eco-environment quality declined slightly in the study area. There are distinct spatial changes in the concentrated areas with high land use eco-risk values from 1995 to 2005. The step length of spatial separation of land use eco-risk is comparatively long — 58 km in 1995 and 11 km in 2005 — respectively. There are still nonstructural factors affecting the quality of the regional ecological environment at some small-scales. Our research results can provide some useful information for land eco-management, eco-environmental harnessing and restoration. In the future, some measures should be put forward in the regions with high eco-risk value, which include strengthening land use management, avoiding unreasonable types of land use and reducing the degree of fragmentation and separation.
References
[1]
Li, X.B. Core of global environmental change research: Frontier in land use and coverage change. Acta Geo. Sin. 1996, 51, 553–558. in Chinese.
[2]
Vitousek, P.M.; Mooney, H.A.; Lubchenco, J.; Melillo, J.M. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 1997, 277, 494–499, doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494.
[3]
Xie, H.L.; Liu, L.M.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.S. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of multi-scale land-use changes: A case study in Ongniud Banner, Inner Mongolia. Acta Geo. Sin. 2006, 61, 389–400.
[4]
Xie, H.L.; Kung, C.-C.; Zhang, Y.T.; Li, X.B. Simulation of regionally ecological land based on a cellular automation model: A case study of Beijing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2986–3001, doi:10.3390/ijerph9082986.
[5]
Pearsons, T.N.; Murdoch, A.R.; Mackey, G.; Murdoch, K.G.; Hillman, T.W.; Cooper, M.R.; Miller, J.L. Ecological risk assessment of multiple hatchery programs in the upper Columbia watershed using Delphi and modeling approaches. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2012, 94, 87–100, doi:10.1007/s10641-011-9884-1.
[6]
Landis, W.G. Twenty years before and hence; Ecological risk assessment at multiple scales with multiple stressors and multiple endpoints. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2003, 9, 1317–1326, doi:10.1080/10807030390248500.
[7]
Bartolo, R.E.; van Dam, R.A.; Bayliss, P. Regional ecological risk assessment for Australia’s Tropical rivers: Application of the relative risk model. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2012, 18, 16–46, doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.631467.
[8]
Perrodin, Y.; Boillot, C.; Angerville, R.; Donguy, G.; Emmanuel, E. Ecological risk assessment of urban and industrial systems: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 5162–5176, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.053.
[9]
Peng, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S. Research on landscape ecology and sustainable land use. Acta Scinentiarum Naturalium Un. 2004, 41, 154–160.
[10]
Turner, M.G. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20, 171–179.
[11]
Risser, P.G.; Karr, J.R.; Forman, R.T.T. Landscape ecology: Directions and approaches. In A Workshop Held at Allerton Park; Illinois Natural History Survey: Piatt, IL, USA, 1984.
Shinneman, D.J.; Palik, B.J.; Cornett, M.W. Can landscape-level ecological restoration influence fire risk? A spatially-explicit assessment of a northern temperate-southern boreal forest landscape. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 274, 126–135, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.02.030.
[14]
Bayliss, P.; van Dam, R.A.; Bartolo, R.E. Quantitative ecological risk assessment of the Magela Creek Floodplain in Kakadu National Park, Australia: Comparing point source risks from the ranger uranium mine to diffuse landscape-scale risks. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2012, 18, 115–151, doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.632290.
[15]
Liu, S.L.; Cui, B.S.; Dong, S.K.; Yang, Z.F.; Yang, M.; Holt, K. Evaluating the influence of road networks on landscape and regional ecological risk—A case study in Lancang River Valley of Southwest China. Ecol. Eng. 2008, 34, 91–99, doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.07.006.
[16]
Kapustka, L.A. Assessing ecological risks at the landscape scale: Opportunities and technical limitations. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10, p. 11. Available online: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art11/ (accessed on 10 May 2012).
Wang, G.X.; Chen, G.D. Study on the landscape pattern of a desert-oasis ecological system. Arid Zone Res. 1999, 16, 6–11. in Chinese.
[19]
Fu, B.J. The spatial pattern analysis of agricultural landscape in the Loess area. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1996, 16, 337–344. in Chinese.
[20]
Xie, H.L.; Li, X.B. Spatial behavior characteristics of land use based on fractal theory: A case study in the east river watershed, Jiangxi province. Resour. Sci. 2008, 30, 1866–1872. in Chinese.
[21]
Chen, L.D.; Fu, B.J. Analysis of impact of human activity on landscape structure in Yellow river delta—A case study of Dongying region. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1996, 16, 337–344. in Chinese.
[22]
Anselin, L. Regional Science Dissertation and Monograph Series 8. In Estimation Methods for Spatial Autoregressive Structures; Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1980.
[23]
Anselin, L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988.
[24]
Anselin, L. Local indicators of spatial association. Geogr. Anal. 1995, 27, 93–115, doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
[25]
Xie, H.L.; Kung, C.C.; Zhao, Y.L. Spatial disparities of regional forest land change based on ESDA and GIS at the county level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area. Front. Earth Sci. 2012, 6, 445–452, doi:10.1007/s11707-012-0338-7.
[26]
Isaaks, E.H.; Srivastava, R.M. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
[27]
Goovaerts, P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
Robertson, G.P.; Gross, K.L. Assessing the Heterogeneity of Belowground Resources: Quantifying Pattern and Scale. In Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants: Ecopgysiological above-and-belowground; Caldwell, M.M., Pearcy, R.W., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1994.
[30]
Getis, A.; Ord, J.K. Local Spatial Statistics: An Overview. In Spatial Analysis: Modeling in a GIS Environment; Lonley, P., Batty, M., Eds.; Geoinformation International: Cambridge, UK, 1996.
