Patient-Related Factors Influencing Satisfaction in the Patient-Doctor Encounters at the General Outpatient Clinic of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
Medical consultation is at the centre of clinical practice. Satisfaction of a patient with this process is a major determinant of the clinical outcome. This study sought to determine the proportion of patients who were satisfied with their doctor-patient encounter and the patient-related factors that affected patients’ satisfaction with the consultation process. A clinic-based, cross-sectional study using a modified version of the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ), which employed a systematic sampling technique, was used. The questionnaires were administered on 430 patients within the ages of 18 years and 65 years. Among the 430 subjects within the ages of 18 years and 65 years studied, 200 (46.5%) were males and 230 (53.5%) were females. Only 59.3% were satisfied with their patient-doctor encounter. The patient’s perception of time spent in the consultation, illness understanding after the visit, ability to cope with the illness after the visit, and ability to maintain health after visit were the only factors that affected patient’s satisfaction with the consultation. In our environment, nonsatisfaction with the patient-doctor encounter is high. Only few factors considered to encourage a patients satisfaction at primary care consultation contributed to end-of-consultation satisfaction. This calls for refocusing so as to improve the overall patient care in our cultural context and meet the patient needs in our environment. 1. Introduction There is an increasing interest in the study of the consultation process and patients’ satisfaction with it [1]. The core activity in primary care is the consultation irrespective of whether patients consult for cure, services, counseling, prevention, or care. A widely accepted model views the consultation as a dialogue involving elements of negotiation to create a common reality to which agenda setting is paramount [2]. In the medical consultation the doctor and patient meet on common grounds with tolerance for each other’s rights. This consultation by necessity requires a doctor who is expected to possess the requisite knowledge which will be useful in solving the problems the patient presents with the assumption that the doctor will act in the best interest of the patient. Guided by rules of professional conduct, objectivity, and being emotionally detached the doctor is guaranteed the right to examine the patient physically and to enquire into intimate areas of the patient’s physical and emotional life. During the consultation, the reason for attendance is defined and an appropriate action is chosen.
References
[1]
G. Makoul, P. H. Brunett, T. L. Campbell, et al., “Essential elements of communication in medical encounters. The Kalamazoo consensus statement from the Bayer–Fetzer Conference on Physician–Patient Communication in Medical Education,” Academic Medicine, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 390–393, 2001.
[2]
M. Peltenburg, J. E. Fischer, O. Bahrs, S. Van Dulmen, and A. Van Den Brink-Muinen, “The unexpected in primary care: a multicenter study on the emergence of unvoiced patient agenda,” Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 534–540, 2004.
[3]
M. Lim, “Who is being difficult? addressing the determinants of difficult patient-physician relationships,” Virtual Mentor, vol. 5, article 4, 2003.
[4]
L. C. Zandbelt, E. M. A. Smets, F. J. Oort, M. H. Godfried, and H. C. J. M. de Haes, “Determinants of physicians' patient-centred behaviour in the medical specialist encounter,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 899–910, 2006.
[5]
“Cross River State Tourism Bureau: brief notes on old Calabar,” 2011, http://www.crstb.com/.
[6]
“General Practice Assessment Questionnaire 2005,” 2008, http://www.gpaq.info/.
[7]
Epi Info, “Centres for Disease Control, Atlanta Georgia, United States,” 2010, http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/.
[8]
L. C. Zandbelt, E. M. A. Smets, F. J. Oort, M. H. Godfried, and H. C. J. M. De Haes, “Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients' and physicians' views,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1088–1095, 2004.
[9]
B. Abdosh, “The quality of hospital services in Eastern Ethiopia: patients’ perspective,” The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 199–200, 2006.
[10]
S. Bu-Alayyan, A. Mostafa, B. Al-Etaibi, E. Sorkhou, H. Al-Taher, and A. Al-Weqayyan, “Patient satisfaction with primary health care services in Kuwait,” Kuwait Medical Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2008.
[11]
C. C. Thiedke, “What do we really know about patient satisfaction?” Family Practice Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2007.
[12]
A. SchaHner, A. Bronstein, and N. Jellin, “Information and Shared Decision-making are top patients priorities,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 6, article 21, 2006.
[13]
G. K. Freeman, J. P. Horder, J. G. R. Howie et al., “Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context,” British Medical Journal, vol. 324, no. 7342, pp. 880–882, 2002.
[14]
P. Hjortdahl and E. Lxrum, “Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction,” British Medical Journal, vol. 304, pp. 1287–1290, 1992.
[15]
H. T?hep?ld, H. I. Maaroos, R. Kalda, and A. Van den Brink-Muinen, “Structure and duration of consultations in Estonian family practice,” Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 167–170, 2003.
[16]
P. Little, C. Gould, I. Williamson, G. Warner, M. Gantley, and A. L. Kinmonth, “Clinical and psychosocial predictors of illness duration from randomised controlled trial of prescribing strategies for sore throat,” British Medical Journal, vol. 319, no. 7212, pp. 736–737, 1999.
[17]
C. Campbell and G. McGauley, “Doctor-patient relationships in chronic illness: insights from forensic psychiatry,” British Medical Journal, vol. 330, no. 7492, pp. 667–670, 2005.
[18]
S. A. T. Law and N. Britten, “Factors that influence the patient centeredness of a consultation,” British Journal of General Practice, vol. 45, pp. 520–524, 1995.
[19]
S. A. Keitz, K. M. Stechuchak, S. C. Grambow, C. M. Koropchak, and J. A. Tulsky, “Behind closed doors: management of patient expectations in primary care practices,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 167, no. 5, pp. 445–452, 2007.
[20]
L. Gask and T. Usherwood, “ABC of psychological medicine: the consultation,” British Medical Journal, vol. 324, no. 7353, pp. 1567–1569, 2002.
[21]
S. Williams, J. Weinman, and J. Dale, “Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review,” Family Practice, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 480–492, 1998.
[22]
H. T?hep?ld, den Brink-Muinen A. van, and H. Maaroos, “Patient expectations from consultation with familyphysician,” Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 47, pp. 148–154, 2006.
[23]
S. Michie, J. Miles, and J. Weinman, “Patient-centeredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter?” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 197–206, 2002.