Introduction. To consider the use of medical chaperones during certain clinical examinations is important whether one practises as a specialist, nurse, medical student, or generalist. Chaperones have been used by doctors conducting intimate examinations for many years but their true extent remains largely unknown. Until recently, there was no national guidance in Australia. Aim. To explore the attitudes and practices of general practitioners (GP) regarding their use of chaperones in urban Melbourne, Australia. Method. Qualitative two focus groups involving seventeen GPs from two locations. Discussions were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed. Results. Common themes and subthemes emerged which were grouped into three main areas: (a) practitioner-related, (b) patient-related and (c) practice related. Discussion. This is the first study from an Australian primary care perspective to gauge the attitudes and experiences of GPs on their use of chaperones. It will provide vital information to inform the next step of extending this research to a national GP audience. From an international perspective, this study provides an excellent template for other primary care clinicians to conduct research in this important field of doctor-patient relationship. 1. Introduction Medical chaperones are people, often health professionals that act as third-party observers during certain clinical examinations (most often intimate examinations), either at the request of the patient or because of the doctor’s clinical judgement. The issue of medical chaperones is important whether one practises as a specialist, nurse, medical student, or generalist. This is repeatedly highlighted by newspapers and medical magazines where doctors (or nurses) have acted inappropriately. It often has life-changing repercussions for one or both parties [1, 2]. Although chaperones have been used by doctors conducting intimate examinations for many years, there seems to be no uniformity as to how and when chaperones should be used varying considerably between countries [3]. In some countries such as New Zealand and the United Kingdom, chaperones are used routinely [4, 5]. In other countries, such as Saudi Arabia, there is the potential influence of culture and religion [6], but in other countries, the use of chaperones remains largely unknown. In Australia, there are no publications about the use of medical chaperones that relate to primary care where the vast majority of medical consultations occur. There is limited guidance from the Royal College of Australian General Practitioners (RACGP)
References
[1]
A. Decleglie, “Male doctors to get chaperones after sexual misconduct claims,” The Sunday Mail, 2010, http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/male-doctors-to-get-chaperones-after-sexual-misconduct-claims/story-e6freon6-1225857801681.
[2]
J. Kron, “When three's company: should GPs always use a chaperone for intimate examinations? The answer is not straightforward,” Australian Doctor, 2010, http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/be/0c06aebe.asp.
[3]
K. E. Rogstad, “Chaperones: protecting the patient or protecting the doctor?” Sexual Health, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 85–87, 2007.
[4]
J. A. Baber, S. C. Davies, and L. S. Dayan, “An extra pair of eyes: do patients want a chaperone when having an anogenital examination?” Sexual Health, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 89–93, 2007.
[5]
S. Conway and I. Harvey, “Use and offering of chaperones by general practitioners: postal questionnaire survey in Norfolk,” British Medical Journal, vol. 330, no. 7485, pp. 235–236, 2005.
[6]
E. A. Al-Gaai and M. M. Hammami, “Medical chaperoning at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: survey of physicians,” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 729–732, 2009.
[7]
RACGP, The Use of Chaperones in General Practice, 2007, http://www.racgp.org.au/.
[8]
J. Ritchie and L. Spencer, “Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research,” in Analyzing Qualitative Data, A. Bryman and R. Burgess, Eds., pp. 173–194, Sage, London, Uk, 1994.
[9]
P. Liamputtong and D. Ezzy, Qualitative Research Methods, Oxford University Press, 2005.
[10]
S. Polgar and S. A. Thomas, Introduction to Research in the Health Sciences, Elsevier, London, UK, 4th edition, 2005.
[11]
D. Wai, M. Katsaris, and R. Singhal, “Chaperones: are we protecting patients?” British Journal of General Practice, vol. 58, no. 546, pp. 54–56, 2008.
[12]
D. H. Price, C. S. Tracy, and R. E. G. Upshur, “Chaperone use during intimate examinations in primary care: postal survey of family physicians,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 6, article 52, 2005.
[13]
D. L. Whitford, M. Karim, and G. Thompson, “Attitudes of patients towards the use of chaperones in primary care,” British Journal of General Practice, vol. 51, no. 466, pp. 381–383, 2001.
[14]
J. Rosenthal, J. Rymer, R. Jones, S. Haldane, S. Cohen, and J. Bartholomew, “Chaperones for intimate examinations: cross sectional survey of attitudes and practices of general practitioners,” British Medical Journal, vol. 330, no. 7485, pp. 234–235, 2005.
[15]
A. Speelman, J. Savage, and M. Verburgh, “Use of chaperones by general practitioners,” British Medical Journal, vol. 307, no. 6910, pp. 986–987, 1993.
[16]
K. L. Moores, N. H. Metcalfe, and D. W. Pring, “Chaperones and intimate physical examinations: consultant practice and views on chaperones,” Clinical Governance, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 210–219, 2010.
[17]
E. Ong, S. Garnett, J. R. MacFarlane, and R. Donat, “Do we need chaperones for intimate examination in urology clinics? Patients' preferences and urologists' practice in Scotland,” British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 46–51, 2010.
[18]
S. A. Santen, N. Seth, R. R. Hemphill, and K. D. Wrenn, “Chaperones for rectal and genital examinations in the emergency department: what do patients and physicians want?” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 2008.
[19]
A. M. Sinclair, T. Gunendran, and I. Pearce, “Use of chaperones in the urology outpatient setting: a patient's choice in a “patient-centred” service,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 83, no. 975, pp. 64–65, 2007.
[20]
K. L. Pydah and J. Howard, “The awareness and use of chaperones by patients in an English general practice,” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 512–513, 2010.
[21]
C. S. Tracy and R. E. G. Upshur, “The medical chaperone: outdated anachronism or modern necessity?” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 9–10, 2008.
[22]
NHS, Guidance on the Role and Effective Use of Chaperones in Primary and Community Care Settings, NHS, Clinical Governance Support Team, Edinburgh, UK, 2005.
[23]
RCOG, Gynaecological Examinations: Guidelines for Specialist Practice, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Regents Park, UK, 2002.
[24]
General Medical Council, Maintaining Boundaries, 2006.
[25]
D. C. Newton, C. K. Fairley, R. Teague et al., “Australian sexual health practitioners' use of chaperones for genital examinations: a survey of attitudes and practice,” Sexual Health, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 95–97, 2007.
[26]
R. Teague, D. Newton, C. K. Fairley et al., “The differing views of male and female patients toward chaperones for genital examinations in a sexual health setting,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1004–1007, 2007.
[27]
L. Fitzgerald, Up Close and Personal—Intimate Examinations and Chaperones, MIGA Bulletin, 2010.
[28]
Medical Board of Australia, Good Medical Practice: A Code of Conduct For Doctors in Australia, 2010, http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/.
[29]
Medical Board of Australia, Sexual Boundaries: Guidelines for Doctors, Medical Board of Australia, 2011, http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/.