全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Some Normal Criteria about Shared Values with Their Multiplicity Zeros

DOI: 10.1155/2010/147878

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Let be a family of meromorphic functions in the domain , all of whose zeros are multiple. Let be an integer and let , be two nonzero finite complex numbers. If and share in for every pair of functions , then is normal in . 1. Introduction and Main Results We use to denote the open complex plane, to denote the extended complex plane, and to denote a domain in . With renewed interest in normal families of analytic and meromorphic functions in plane domains, mainly because of their role in complex dynamics, it has become quite interesting to talk about normal families in their own right. We will be concerned with the analytic maps (i.e., meromorphic functions) from (endowed with the Euclidean metric) to the extended complex plane endowed with the spherically metric given by A family of meromorphic functions defined in is said to be normal, in the sense of Montel, if for any sequence , there exists a subsequence such that converges spherically locally and uniformly in to a meromorphic function or . Clearly, is normal in if and only if it is normal at every point of (see [1, 2]). Let and be two nonconstant meromorphic functions in , and . We say that and share the value in , if and have the same zeros (ignoring multiplicities). When the zeros of means the poles of (see [3]). Influenced from Bloch's principle [4], every condition which reduces a meromorphic function in the plane to a constant, makes a family of meromorphic functions in a domain normal. Although the principle is false in general (see [5]), many authors proved normality criterion for families of meromorphic functions corresponding to Liouville-Picard type theorem (see [1, 2, 6]). It is also more interesting to find normality criteria from the point of view of shared values. In this area, Schiff [1] first proved an interesting result that a family of meromorphic functions in a domian is normal if in which every function shares three distinct finite complex numbers with its first derivative. And later, Sun [7] proved that a family of meromorphic functions in a domian is normal if in which each pair of functions share three fixed distinct valus, which is an improvement of the famous Montel's Normal Criterion [8] by the ideas of shared values. More results about normality criteria concerning shared values can be found, for instance, (see [9–12]) and so on. In 1989, Schwick [13] proved that let be a family of meromorphic functions in a domain , if for every , where , are two positive integers and , then is normal in . Recently, by the ideas of shared values, Li and Gu [14] proved the following.

References

[1]  J. L. Schiff, Normal Families, Universitext, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
[2]  Lo Yang, Value Distribution Theory, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1993.
[3]  C.-C. Yang and H.-X. Yi, Uniqueness Theory of Meromorphic Functions, vol. 557 of Mathematics and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.
[4]  W. Bergweiler, “Bloch's principle,” Computational Methods and Function Theory, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77–108, 2006.
[5]  L. A. Rubel, “Four counterexamples to Bloch's principle,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 257–260, 1986.
[6]  D. Drasin, “Normal families and the Nevanlinna theory,” Acta Mathematica, vol. 122, pp. 231–263, 1969.
[7]  D. C. Sun, “The shared value criterion for normality,” Journal of Wuhan University. Natural Science Edition, no. 3, pp. 9–12, 1994.
[8]  P. Montel, “Sur les familles de fonctions analytiques qui admettent des valeurs exceptionnelles dans un domaine,” Annales Scientifiques de l'école Normale Supérieure, vol. 29, pp. 487–535, 1912.
[9]  M. Fang and L. Zalcman, “A note on normality and shared values,” Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 141–150, 2004.
[10]  X. Pang and L. Zalcman, “Normal families and shared values,” The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 325–331, 2000.
[11]  X. Pang and L. Zalcman, “Normality and shared values,” Arkiv f?r Matematik, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 171–182, 2000.
[12]  Q. Zhang, “Normal families of meromorphic functions concerning shared values,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 338, no. 1, pp. 545–551, 2008.
[13]  W. Schwick, “Normality criteria for families of meromorphic functions,” Journal d'Analyse Mathématique, vol. 52, pp. 241–289, 1989.
[14]  Y. Li and Y. Gu, “On normal families of meromorphic functions,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 354, no. 2, pp. 421–425, 2009.
[15]  Y. F. Wang and M. L. Fang, “The value distributions of meromorphic functions with multiple zeros,” Acta Mathematica Sinica. Chinese Series, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 743–748, 1998.
[16]  W. K. Hayman, “Picard values of meromorphic functions and their derivatives,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 70, pp. 9–42, 1959.
[17]  E. Mues, “über ein Problem von Hayman,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 239–259, 1979.
[18]  W. K. Hayman, Research Problems in Function Theory, The Athlone Press University of London, London, UK, 1967.
[19]  Y. S. Ye, “A Picard type theorem and Bloch law,” Chinese Annals of Mathematics. Series B, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 1994.
[20]  M. Fang and L. Zalcman, “On the value distribution of ,” Science in China. Series A, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1196–1202, 2008.
[21]  K. S. Charak and J. Rieppo, “Two normality criteria and the converse of the Bloch principle,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 353, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2009.
[22]  M. Fang and W. Yuan, “On Rosenbloom's fixed-point theorem and related results,” Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series A, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 321–333, 2000.
[23]  W. J. Yuan and Y. D. Yang, “On normal criterion of meromorphic functions related the conjecture of Hayman,” Journal of Guangzhou University. Natural Science Edition, vol. 6, pp. 1–4, 2007.
[24]  L. Zalcman, “Normal families: new perspectives,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 215–230, 1998.
[25]  W. Bergweiler and A. Eremenko, “On the singularities of the inverse to a meromorphic function of finite order,” Revista Matemática Iberoamericana, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 355–373, 1995.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133