When cows on dairy farms are milked with an automatic milking system or in high capacity milking parlors, clinical mastitis (CM) cannot be adequately detected without sensors. The objective of this paper is to describe the performance demands of sensor systems to detect CM and evaluats the current performance of these sensor systems. Several detection models based on different sensors were studied in the past. When evaluating these models, three factors are important: performance (in terms of sensitivity and specificity), the time window and the similarity of the study data with real farm data. A CM detection system should offer at least a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 99%. The time window should not be longer than 48 hours and study circumstances should be as similar to practical farm circumstances as possible. The study design should comprise more than one farm for data collection. Since 1992, 16 peer-reviewed papers have been published with a description and evaluation of CM detection models. There is a large variation in the use of sensors and algorithms. All this makes these results not very comparable. There is a also large difference in performance between the detection models and also a large variation in time windows used and little similarity between study data. Therefore, it is difficult to compare the overall performance of the different CM detection models. The sensitivity and specificity found in the different studies could, for a large part, be explained in differences in the used time window. None of the described studies satisfied the demands for CM detection models.
References
[1]
Kuip, A. Animal Identification. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium Automation in Dairying; Wageningen: The Netherlands, 1987; pp. 12–17.
[2]
Halasa, T; Huijps, K; Osteras, O; Hogeveen, H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review. Vet. Q？2007, 29, 18–31.
[3]
Huijps, K; Lam, T; Hogeveen, H. Costs of mastitis: Facts and perception. J. Dairy Res？2008, 75, 113–120.
[4]
Rasmussen, MD. Visual scoring of clots in foremilk. J. Dairy Res？2005, 72, 406–414.
[5]
Rasmussen, MD; Bjerring, M. Visual scoring of milk mixed with blood. J. Dairy Res？2005, 72, 257–263.
[6]
Brandt, M; Haeussermann, A; Hartung, E. Invited review: Technical solutions for analysis of milk constituents and abnormal milk. J. Dairy Res？2010, 93, 427–436.
[7]
Kamphuis, C; Mollenhorst, H; Heesterbeek, JAP; Hogeveen, H. Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems is improved by using decision-tree induction. J. Dairy Res？2010, 93, 3616–3627.
[8]
Mollenhorst, H; van der Tol, PPJ; Hogeveen, H. Somatic cell count assessment at the quarter or cow milking level. J. Dairy Sci？2010, 93, 3358–3364.
[9]
Kramer, E; Cavero, D; Stamer, E; Krieter, J. Mastitis and lameness detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic. Livest. Sci？2009, 125, 92–96.
[10]
Chagunda, MGG; Friggens, NC; Rasmussen, MD; Larsen, T. A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. J. Dairy Sci？2006, 89, 2980–2998.
[11]
Friggens, NC; Chagunda, MGG; Bjerring, M; Ridder, C; Hojsgaard, S; Larsen, T. Estimating degree of mastitis from time-series measurements in milk: A test of a model based on lactate dehydrogenase measurements. J. Dairy Sci？2007, 90, 5415–5427.
[12]
Mottram, T; Rudnitskaya, A; Legin, A; Fitzpatrick, JL; Eckersall, PD. Evaluation of a novel chemical sensor system to detect clinical mastitis in bovine milk. Biosensor. Bioelectron？2007, 22, 2689–2693.
[13]
Song, X; Zhuang, S; Van der Tol, PPJ. New model to detect clinical mastitis in Astronaut A3 next milking robot. In Mastitis Research into Practice; Hillerton, JE, Ed.; VetLearn: Wellington, New Zealand, 2010; pp. 2689–2693.
[14]
Maatje, K; Huijsmans, PJM; Rossing, W; Hogewerf, PH. The efficacy of in-line measurement of quarter milk electrical conductivity, milk yield and milk temperature for the detection of clinical and subclinical mastitis. Livest. Prod. Sci？1992, 30, 239–249.
[15]
Nielen, M; Schukken, YH; Brand, A; Haring, S; Ferwerda-Van Zonneveld, RT. Comparison of analysis techniques for online detection of clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci？1995, 78, 1050–1061.
[16]
Nielen, M; Spigt, MH; Schukken, YH; Deluyker, HA; Maatje, K; Brand, A. Application of a neural network to analyze online milking parlor data for the detection of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med？1995, 22, 15–28.
[17]
De Mol, R; Kroeze, GH; Achten, JMFH; Maatje, K; Rossing, W. Results of a multivariate approach to automated oestrus and mastitis detection. Livest. Prod. Sci？1997, 48, 219–227.
[18]
De Mol, RM; Ouweltjes, W. Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. Prev. Vet. Med？2001, 49, 71–82.
[19]
De Mol, RM; Woldt, WE. Application of fuzzy logic in automated cow status monitoring. J. Dairy Sci？2001, 84, 400–410.
[20]
De Mol, RM; Ouweltjes, W; Kroeze, GH; Hendriks, MMWB. Detection of estrus and mastitis: Field performance of a model. Appl. Eng. Agric？2001, 17, 399–407.
[21]
Norberg, E; Hogeveen, H; Korsgaard, IR; Friggens, NC; Sloth, KHMN; Lovendahl, P. Electrical conductivity of milk: Ability to predict mastitis status. J. Dairy Sci？2004, 87, 1099–1107.
[22]
Cavero, D; Tolle, KH; Buxade, C; Krieter, J. Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic. Livest. Sci？2006, 105, 207–213.
[23]
Kamphuis, C; Sherlock, R; Jago, J; Mein, G; Hogeveen, H. Automatic detection of clinical mastitis is improved by in-line monitoring of somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci？2008, 91, 4560–4570.
[24]
Claycomb, RW; Johnstone, PT; Mein, GA; Sherlock, RA. An automated in-line clinical mastitis detection system using measurement of conductivity from foremilk of individual udder quarters. N. Z. Vet. J？2009, 57, 208–214.
[25]
Kamphuis, C; Mollenhorst, H; Feelders, A; Pietersma, D; Hogeveen, H. Decision-tree induction to detect clinical mastitis with automatic milking. Comput. Electron. Agric？2010, 70, 60–68.
[26]
Sun, ZB; Samarasinghe, S; Jago, J. Detection of mastitis and its stage of progression by automatic milking systems using artificial neural networks. J. Dairy Res？2010, 77, 168–175.
[27]
Sherlock, R; Hogeveen, H; Mein, G; Rasmussen, MD. Performance Evluation of Systems for Automated Monitoring of Udder Health: Analytical Issues and Guidelines. In Mastitis Control: From Science to Practise; Lam, TJGM, Ed.; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherland, 2008; pp. 275–281.
[28]
Hogeveen, H; Ouweltjes, W. Mastitis Therapy and Control—Automatic On-line Detection of Abnormal Milk. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences; Roginski, H, Fuquay, JW, Fox, PF, Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2002; pp. 1735–1740.
[29]
Mein, G; Rasmussen, MD. Performance Evaluation of Systems for Automated Monitoring of Udder Health: Would the Real Gold Standard Please Stand Up? In Mastitis Control: From Science to Practise; Lam, TJGM, Ed.; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 259–265.
[30]
Hillerton, JE; Kliem, KE. Effective Treatment of Streptococcus Uberis Clinical Mastitis to Minimize the Use of Antibiotics. J. Dairy Sci？2002, 85, 1009–1014.
[31]
Milner, P; Page, KL; Hillerton, JE. The effects of early antibiotic treatment following diagnosis of mastitis detected by a change in the electrical conductivity of milk. J. Dairy Sci？1997, 80, 859–863.
[32]
Hogeveen, H; Ouweltjes, W. Sensors and management support in high-technology milking. J. Anim. Sci？2003, 81, 1–10.
[33]
Kitchen, BJ. Review of the progress of dairy science: Bovine mastitis: Milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. J. Dairy Rev？1981, 48, 167–188.
[34]
Viguier, C; Arora, S; Gilmartin, N; Welbeck, K; O'Kennedy, R. Mastitis detection: Current trends and future perspectives. Trends Biotech？2009, 27, 486–493.
[35]
Linzell, JL; Peaker, M. Mechanism of milk secretion. Physiol. Rev？1971, 51, 564–597.
[36]
Nielen, M; Deluyker, H; Schukken, YH; Brand, A. Electrical conductivity of milk: Measurement, modifiers and meta analysis of mastitis detection performance. J. Dairy Sci？1992, 75, 606–614.
[37]
Mazeris, F. DeLaval Herd Navigator: Proactive Herd Management. Proceedings of First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, Toronto, Canada, 2–5 March 2010; pp. 26–27.
[38]
Ouweltjes, W; Hogeveen, H. Detecting Abnormal Milk Through Colour Measuring. Proceedings of 40th National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, USA, 11–14 Feberury 2001; pp. 217–219.
[39]
Paape, MJ; Wergin, WP; Guidry, AJ; Pearson, RE. Leukocytes 2nd line of defense against invading mastitis pathogens. J. Dairy Sci？1979, 62, 135–153.
[40]
Tsenkova, R; Atanassova, S; Toyoda, K; Ozaki, Y; Itoh, K; Fearn, T. Near-infrared spectroscopy for dairy management: Measurement of unhomogenized milk composition. J. Dairy Sci？1999, 82, 2344–2351.
[41]
Katz, G; Arazi, A; Pinsky, N; Halachmi, I; Schmilovitz, Z; Aizinbud, E; Maltz, E. Current and near term technologies for automated recording of animal data for precision dairy farming. J. Anim. Sci？2007, 85, 377–377.
[42]
Whyte, D; Walmsley, M; Liew, A; Claycomb, R; Mein, G. Chemical and rheological aspects of gel formation in the California Mastitis Test. J. Dairy Rev？2005, 72, 115–121.
[43]
Lusis, I; Antane, V; Laurs, A. Effectiveness of Somatic Cell Count Determination in the Milking Robots. Proceedings of the Conference Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia, 27–28 May 2010; pp. 112–116.
Elofsson, UM; Dejmek, P; Paulsson, MA. Heat-induced aggregation of beta-lactoglobulin studied by dynamic light scattering. Int. Dairy J？1996, 6, 343–357.
[46]
Maassen-Francke, B; Wiethoff, M; Suhr, O; Clemens, C; Knoll, A. A Method to Detect Flakes and Clots in Milk in Automatic Milking Systems. In Automatic Milking A Better Understanding; Meijering, A, Hogeveen, H, de Koning, CJAM, Eds.; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2004; p. 251.
[47]
Hogeveen, H; Varner, MA; Brée, DS; Dill, DE; Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN; Brand, A. Knowledge representation methods for dairy decision-support systems. J. Dairy Sci？1994, 77, 3704–3715.
[48]
de Mol, RM; Keen, A; Kroeze, GH; Achten, J. Description of a detection model for oestrus and diseases in dairy cattle based on time series analysis combined with a Kalman filter. Comput. Electron. Agric？1999, 22, 171–185.
[49]
Cavero, D; Tolle, KH; Rave, G; Buxade, C; Krieter, J. Analysing serial data for mastitis detection by means of local regression. Livest. Sci？2007, 110, 101–110.
[50]
Cavero, D; Tolle, KH; Henze, C; Buxade, C; Krieter, J. Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of neural networks. Livest. Sci？2008, 114, 280–286.
[51]
Kamphuis, C; Pietersma, D; van der Tol, R; Wiedemann, M; Hogeveen, H. Using sensor data patterns from an automatic milking system to develop predictive variables for classifying clinical mastitis and abnormal milk. Comput. Electron. Agric？2008, 62, 169–181.
[52]
Steeneveld, W; Hogeveen, H; Barkema, HW; van den Broek, J; Huirne, RBM. The influence of cow factors on the incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci？2008, 91, 1391–1402.
[53]
Steeneveld, W; van der Gaag, LC; Barkema, HW; Hogeveen, H. Simplify the interpretation of alert lists for clinical mastitis in automatic milking systems. Comput. Electron. Agric？2010, 71, 50–56.
[54]
Steeneveld, W; van der Gaag, LC; Ouweltjes, W; Mollenhorst, H; Hogeveen, H. Discriminating between true-positive and false-positive clinical mastitis alerts from automatic milking systems. J. Dairy Sci？2010, 93, 2559–2568.
[55]
Hojsgaard, S; Friggens, NC. Quantifying degree of mastitis from common trends in a panel of indicators for mastitis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci？2010, 93, 582–592.
