Odor detection thresholds (ODTs) are used for assessing outdoor and indoor air quality. They are obtained experimentally by olfactometry and psychophysical methods, and large compilations are available in the literature. A non-linear regression equation was fitted to describe the ODT variability of 114 aliphatic compounds based on the alkyl chain length for different homologous series (carboxylic acids, aldehydes, 2-ketones, esters, 1-alcohols, amines, thiols, thioethers and hydrocarbons). The resulting equation reveals an effect of the functional group, molecular size and also an interaction between both factors. Although the mechanistic interpretation of results is uncertain, the relatively high goodness-of-fit (R2 = 0.90) suggests that ODT values of aliphatic compounds can be predicted rather accurately, which is not the case for rigid molecules. This equation may serve as a basis for the development of more complex ODT models taking into account diverse structural features of odorants. The variability of power-law exponents was also investigated for the homologous series.
References
[1]
Doty, R.L. Psychophysical measurement of odor perception in humans. In The Human Sense of Smell; Laing, D.G., Doty, R.L., Breipohl, W., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1991; pp. 95–134.
[2]
Air Quality—Determination of Odor Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry. EN 13725:2003; European Committee of Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
[3]
Devos, M.; Rouault, J.; Laffort, P. Standardized Olfactory Power Law Exponents; Editions Universitaires de Dijon: Dijon, France, 2002.
[4]
Neuner-Jehle, N.; Etzweiler, F. The measuring of odors. In Perfumes: Art, Science, and Technology; Müller, P.M., Lamparsky, D., Eds.; Elsevier Applied Science Publishers: London, UK, 1991; pp. 153–212.
[5]
Kim, K.-H. Experimental demonstration of masking phenomena between competing odorants via an air dilution sensory test. Sensors 2010, 10, 7287–7302, doi:10.3390/s100807287. 22163603
[6]
Kim, K.-H. The averaging effect of odorant mixing as determined by air dilution sensory tests: A case study on reduced sulfur compounds. Sensors 2011, 11, 1405–1417. 22319360
[7]
Laing, D.G.; Panhuber, H.; Slotnick, B.M. Odor masking in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 1989, 45, 689–694, doi:10.1016/0031-9384(89)90280-1. 2780835
[8]
Cometto-Mu？iz, J.E.; Cain, W.S.; Abraham, M.H. Dose-addition of individual odorants in the odor detection of binary mixtures. Behav. Brain Res. 2003, 138, 95–105, doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00234-6. 12493633
[9]
Laska, M.; Hudson, R. A comparison of the detection thresholds of odour mixtures and their components. Chem. Senses 1991, 16, 651–662, doi:10.1093/chemse/16.6.651.
[10]
Miyazawa, T.; Gallagher, M.; Preti, G.; Wise, P.M. Synergistic mixture interactions in detection of perithreshold odors by humans. Chem. Senses 2008, 33, 363–369, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjn004. 18283044
[11]
Laffort, P.; Etcheto, M.; Patte, F.; Marfaing, P. Implications of power law exponent in synergy and inhibition of olfactory mixtures. Chem. Senses 1989, 14, 11–23, doi:10.1093/chemse/14.1.11.
[12]
Hellman, T.M.; Small, F.H. Characterization of the odor properties of 101 petrochemicals using sensory methods. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1974, 24, 979–982, doi:10.1080/00022470.1974.10470005. 4412400
[13]
Kim, K.-H.; Park, S.-Y. A comparative analysis of malodor samples between direct (olfactometry) and indirect (instrumental) methods. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 5061–5070, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.017.
[14]
van Gemert, L.J. Compilations of Odour Threshold Values in Air, Water and Other Media; Oliemans, Punter & Partners BV: Zeist, The Netherlands, 2006.
[15]
Fazzalari, F.A. Compilation of Odor and Taste Threshold Values Data; ASTM Data Series DS 48A; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1978.
[16]
Devos, M.; Patte, F.; Rouault, J.; Laffort, P.; van Gemert, L.J. Standardized Human Olfactory Thresholds; Oxford University Press: New York NY, USA, 1990.
[17]
Amoore, J.E.; Hautala, E. Odor as an aid to chemical safety: Odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1983, 3, 272–290, doi:10.1002/jat.2550030603. 6376602
[18]
Nagata, Y. Measurement of odor threshold by triangle odor bag method. Bull. Japan Environ. Sanit. Center 1990, 17, 77–89.
[19]
Edwards, P.A.; Jurs, P.C. Correlation of odor intensities with structural properties of odorants. Chem. Senses 1989, 14, 281–291, doi:10.1093/chemse/14.2.281.
[20]
Abraham, M.H.; Gola, J.M.R.; Cometto-Mu？iz, J.E.; Cain, W.S. A model for odour thresholds. Chem. Senses 2002, 27, 95–104, doi:10.1093/chemse/27.2.95. 11839607
[21]
Zarzo, M. The sense of smell: Molecular basis of odorant recognition. Biol. Rev. 2007, 82, 455–479, doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00019.x. 17624963
[22]
Ohloff, G.; Giersch, W. Stereochemistry-activity relationships in olfaction. Odorants containing a proton donor/proton acceptor unit. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1980, 63, 76–94, doi:10.1002/hlca.19800630109.
[23]
Yoshii, F.; Hirono, S.; Liu, Q.; Moriguchi, I. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of structurally similar odorless and odoriferous benzenoid musks. Chem. Senses 1991, 16, 319–328, doi:10.1093/chemse/16.4.319.
[24]
Ohloff, G. Scent and Fragrances: The Fascination of Odors and Their Chemical Perspectives; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1994.
[25]
Sell, C.S. Scent through the looking glass. Chem. Biodivers. 2004, 1, 1899–1920, doi:10.1002/cbdv.200490146. 17191828
[26]
Schnabel, K.O.; Belitz, H.D.; Von Ranson, C. Investigations on the structure-activity relation of odorous substances. I. Detection thresholds and odor qualities of aliphatic and alicyclic compounds containing oxygen functions. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1988, 187, 215–223, doi:10.1007/BF01043342.
[27]
Walker, J.C.; Hall, S.B.; Walker, D.B.; Kendal-Reed, M.S.; Hood, A.F.; Niu, X.F. Human odor detectability: New methodology used to determine threshold and variation. Chem. Senses 2003, 28, 817–826, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjg075. 14654450
[28]
Beets, M.G.J. Structure and odour. In Molecular Structure and Organoleptic Quality. S.C.I. Monograph No. 1; Society of Chemical Industry: London, UK, 1957; pp. 54–90.
[29]
Brower, K.R.; Schafer, R. The recognition of chemical types by odor and the effect of steric hindrance at the functional group. J. Chem. Educ. 1975, 52, 538–540, doi:10.1021/ed052p538.
