Quantitative analysis of atmospheric optical properties and surface reflectance can be performed by applying radiative transfer theory in the Atmosphere-Earth coupled system, for the atmospheric correction of hyperspectral remote sensing data. This paper describes a new physically-based algorithm to retrieve the aerosol optical thickness at 550nm (τ550) and the surface reflectance (ρ) from airborne acquired data in the atmospheric window of the Visible and Near-Infrared (VNIR) range. The algorithm is realized in two modules. Module A retrieves τ550 with a minimization algorithm, then Module B retrieves the surface reflectance ρ for each pixel of the image. The method was tested on five remote sensing images acquired by an airborne sensor under different geometric conditions to evaluate the reliability of the method. The results, τ550 and ρ, retrieved from each image were validated with field data contemporaneously acquired by a sun-sky radiometer and a spectroradiometer, respectively. Good correlation index, r, and low root mean square deviations, RMSD, were obtained for the τ550 retrieved by Module A (r2 = 0.75, RMSD = 0.08) and the ρ retrieved by Module B (r2 ≤ 0.9, RMSD ≤ 0.003). Overall, the results are encouraging, indicating that the method is reliable for optical atmospheric studies and the atmospheric correction of airborne hyperspectral images. The method does not require additional at-ground measurements about at-ground reflectance of the reference pixel and aerosol optical thickness.
References
[1]
Gao, B-C; Montes, MJ; Davis, CO; Goetz, AFH. Atmospheric correction algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing data of land and ocean. Remote Sens. Environ?2009, 113, S17–S24.
[2]
Liang, S. Quantitative Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004.
[3]
Ben-Dor, E; Levin, N; Saaroni, H. A spectral based recognition of the urban environment using the visible and near-infrared spectral region (0.4 – 1.1 μm). A case study over Tel-Aviv. Int. J. Remote Sens?2001, 22, 2193–2218.
[4]
Bassani, C; Cavalli, RM; Cavalcante, F; Cuomo, V; Palombo, A; Pascucci, S; Pignatti, S. Deterioration status of asbestos-cement roofing sheets assessed by analyzing hyperspectral data. Remote Sens. Environ?2007, 109, 361–378.
[5]
Guanter, L; Estellés, V; Moreno, J. Spectral calibration and atmospheric correction of ultra-fine spectral and spatial resolution remote sensing data. Application to CASI-1500 data. Remote Sens. Environ?2007, 109, 54–65.
[6]
Vermote, EF; El Saleouls, N; Justice, CO; Kaufman, YJ; Privette, JL; Remer, L; Roger, JC; Tanré, D. Atmospheric correction of visible to middle-infrared EOS-MODIS data over land surfaces: Background, operational algorithm and validation. J. Geophys. Res?1997, 102, 17131–17141.
[7]
Vermote, EF; El Saleous, NZ; Justice, CO. Atmospheric correction of MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: first results. Remote Sens. Environ?2002, 83, 97–111.
[8]
Conel, JE; Green, RO; Vane, G; Bruegge, CJ; Alley, RE. AIS-2 radiometry and a comparison of methods for the recovery of ground reflectance. Proceedings of the 3rd Airborne Imaging Data Analysis Workshop, Pasadena, CA, USA, 2–4 June 1987; pp. 18–47.
[9]
Kotchenova, SY; Vermote, EF; Levy, R; Lyapustin, A. Radiative transfer codes for atmospheric correction and aerosol retrieval: Intercomparison study. Appl. Optics?2008, 47, 2215–2226.
[10]
Berk, A; Bernsten, LS; Robertson, DC. MODTRAN: A Moderate resolution model for LOWTRAN7. Report GL-TR-89-0122; Air Force Geophysics Laboratory: Hanscom AFB, MA, USA, 1989.
[11]
Vermote, EF; Tanré, D; Deuzé, JL; Herman, M; Morcrette, JJ. Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: An overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens?1997, 35, 675–686.
[12]
Kruse, FA. Comparison of ATREM, ACORN and FLAASH atmospheric corrections using low-altitude AVIRIS data of Boulder, CO. Summaries of 13th Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) Airborne Geoscience Workshop, Pasadena, CA, USA, 31 March – 2 April, 2004.
[13]
Kaufman, YJ; Wald, A; Remer, LA; Gao, B-C; Li, RR; Flynn, L. The MODIS 2.1 μm channel—correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens?1997, 35, 1286–1298.
[14]
Adler-Golden, SM; Matthew, MW; Berk, A; Fox, MJ; Lee, J; Ratkowski, AJ. Improvements in aerosol retrieval for atmospheric correction. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2008, Boston, MA, USA, 7–11 July, 2008; pp. III-130–III-133.
[15]
Vermote, EF; Kotchenova, S. Atmospheric correction for the monitoring of land surfaces. J. Geophys. Res?2009, 113, D23.
[16]
Kaufman, YJ; Tanré, D; Remer, LA; Vermote, EF; Chq, A; Holben, BN. Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer. J. Geophys. Res?1997, 102, 17051–17067.
[17]
Hutchison, KD; Faruqui, SJ; Smith, S. Improving correlations between MODIS aerosol optical thickness and ground-based PM2.5 observations through 3D spatial analyses. Atmos. Env?2008, 42, 530–543.
[18]
Schaap, M; Timmermans, RMA; Koelemeijer, RBA; de Leeuw, G; Builtjes, PJH. Evaluation of MODIS aerosol optical thickness over Europe using sun photometer observations. Atmos. Env?2008, 42, 2187–2197.
[19]
Baumer, D; Vogel, B; Versick, S; Rinke, R; Mohler, O; Schnaiter, M. Relationship of visibility, aerosol optical thickness and aerosol size distribution in an ageing air mass over South-West Germany. Atmos. Env?2008, 42, 989–998.
[20]
Guanter, L; Alonso, L; Moreno, J. A method for the surface reflectance retrieval from PROBA/CHRIS data over land: Application to ESA SPARC campaigns. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens?2005, 43, 675–686.
[21]
Guanter, L; Gómez-Chova, L; Moreno, J. Coupled retrieval of aerosol optical thickness, columnar water vapor and surface reflectance maps from ENVISAT/MERIS data over land. Remote Sens. Environ?2008, 112, 2898–2913.
[22]
Bianchi, R; Cavalli, RM; Fiumi, L; Marino, CM; Pignatti, S. Airborne imaging spectrometry: A new approach to environmental problems. Proceedings XVIII ISPRS Congress, Vienna, Austria, 12–18 July 1996; pp. 128–132.
[23]
Fava, F; Colombo, R; Bocchi, S; Meroni, M; Sitzia, M; Fois, N; Zucca, C. Identification of hyperspectral vegetation indices for Mediterranean pasture characterization. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf?2009, 11, 233–243.
[24]
Lelong, CCD; Pinet, PC; Poilvé, H. Hyperspectral imaging and stress mapping in agriculture: A Case study on wheat in beauce (France). Remote Sens. Environ?1998, 66, 179–191.
[25]
Stanich, CG; Osterwisch, GF. Advanced operational hyperspectral scanners: MIVIS and AHS. Proceedings of the First International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, Strasbourg, France; 1994; pp. 191–204.
[26]
Ben-Dor, E; Inbar, Y; Chen, Y. The reflectance spectra of organic matter in the visible near-infrared and short wave infrared region (400–2,500 nm) during a controlled decomposition process. Remote Sens. Environ?1997, 61, 1–15.
[27]
Cavalli, RM; Pascucci, S; Pignatti, S. Optimal spectral domain selection for maximizing archaeological signatures: Italy case studies. Sensors?2009, 9, 1754–1767.
[28]
Dalponte, M; Bruzzone, L; Vescovo, L; Gianelle, D. The role of spectral resolution and classifier complexity in the analysis of hyperspectral images of forest areas. Remote Sens. Environ?2009, 113, 2345–2355.
[29]
Powell, MJD. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivates. Comput. J?1964, 7, 155–162.
Baumer, D; Rinke, R; Vogel, B. Weekly periodicities of aerosol optical thickness over Central Europe evidence of an anthropogenic direct aerosol effect. Atmos. Chem. Phys?2008, 8, 83–90.
Smirnov, A; Holben, BN; Eck, TF; Dubovik, O; Slutsker, I. Cloud screening and quality control algorithms for the AERONET database. Remote Sens. Environ?2000, 73, 337–349.
[39]
Dubovik, O; Smirnov, A; Holben, BN; King, MD; Kaufman, YJ; Eck, TF; Slutsker, I. Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from AERONET sun and sky-radiance measurements. J. Geophys. Res?2000, 105, 9791–9806.
[40]
Bassani, C; Cavalli, RM; Pignatti, S; Santini, F. Evaluation of adjacency effect for MIVIS airborne images. Proceedings of SPIE Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XII, Florence, Italy, 17–20 September 2007.