A study on the geometric stability and decentering present in sensor-lens systems of six identical compact digital cameras has been conducted. With regard to geometrical stability, the variation of internal geometry parameters (principal distance, principal point position and distortion parameters) was considered. With regard to lens decentering, the amount of radial and tangential displacement resulting from decentering distortion was related with the precision of the camera and with the offset of the principal point from the geometric center of the sensor. The study was conducted with data obtained after 372 calibration processes (62 per camera). The tests were performed for each camera in three situations: during continuous use of the cameras, after camera power off/on and after the full extension and retraction of the zoom-lens. Additionally, 360 new calibrations were performed in order to study the variation of the internal geometry when the camera is rotated. The aim of this study was to relate the level of stability and decentering in a camera with the precision and quality that can be obtained. An additional goal was to provide practical recommendations about photogrammetric use of such cameras.
References
[1]
Rieke-Zapp, D.H.; Rosenbauer, R.; Schlunegger, F. A photogrammetric surveying method for field applications. Photogramm. Record？2009, 24, 5–22.
[2]
Mills, J.; Barber, D. Geomatics techniques for structural surveying. J. Surv. Engineer.-Asce？2004, 130, 56–64.
[3]
Jiang, R.N.; Jauregui, D.V.; White, K.R. Close-range photogrammetry applications in bridge measurement: Literature review. Measurement？2008, 41, 823–834.
[4]
Blandino, J.R.; Sterling, J.; Baginski, F.; Steadman, E.; Black, J.T.; Pappa, R.S. Optical strain measurement of an inflated cylinder using photogrammetry with application to scientific balloons. Proceedings of Collection of Technical Papers—AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA; 2004; pp. 1–13.
[5]
Ergun, B. An expert measurement system for photogrammetric industrial application. Measurement？2006, 39, 415–419.
[6]
Sanz-Ablanedo, E.; Rodriguez-Perez, J.R.; Arias-Sanchez, P.; Armesto, J. Metric Potential of a 3D Measurement System Based on Digital Compact Cameras. Sensors？2009, 9, 4178–4194.
[7]
Habib, A.; Pullivelli, A.; Mitishita, E.; Ghanma, M.; Kim, E. M. Stability analysis of low-cost digital cameras for aerial mapping using different georeferencing techniques. Photogram. Rec？2006, 21, 29–43.
[8]
Fryer, J.; Mitchell, H.; Chandler, J. Applications of 3D Measurement from Images; Whittles Publishing: Scotland, UK, 2007.
[9]
Rieke-Zapp, D.H.; Peipe, J. Performance evaluation of a 33 megapixel alpa 12 medium format camera for digital close range photogrammetry. Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission V Symposium of Image Engineering and Vision Metrology, Dresden, Germany, September 2006.
[10]
Shortis, M.R.; Robson, S.; Beyer, H.A. Principal point behaviour and calibration parameter models for Kodak DCS cameras. Photogram. Rec？1998, 16, 165–186.
[11]
Shortis, M.R.; Ogleby, C.L.; Robson, S.; Karalis, E.M.; Beyer, H.A. Calibration modelling and stability testing for the Kodak DC200 series digital still camera. Proceedings of SPIE-Videometrics and Optical Methods for 3D Shape Measurement, San Jose, CA, USA, January 2001; pp. 148–153.
[12]
Mills, J.P.; Schneider, D.; Barber, D.M.; Bryan, P.G. Geometric assessment of the kodak DCS Pro back. Photogram. Rec？2003, 18, 193–208.
[13]
Shortis, M.R.; Bellman, C.J.; Robson, S.; Johnston, G.J.; Johnson, G.W. Stability of zoom and fixed lenses used with digital SLR cameras. Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission V Symposium of Image Engineering and Vision Metrology, Dresden, Germany, September 2006; pp. 285–290.
[14]
Wackrow, R.; Chandler, J.H.; Bryan, P. Geometric consistency and stability of consumer-grade digital cameras for accurate spatial measurement. Photogram. Rec？2007, 22, 121–134.
[15]
Rieke-Zap, D.; Tecklenburg, W.; Peipe, J.; Haig, C. Evaluation of the geometric stability and the accuracy potential of digital cameras–Comparing mechanical stabilisation versus parameterisation. J. Photogram. Remote Sens？2009, 64, 248–258.
[16]
Heikkila, J.; Silven, O. Four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Juan, PR, USA, June 1997; pp. 1106–1112.
[17]
Luhmann, T.; Robson, S.; Kyle, S.; Harley, I. Close Range Photogrammetry - Principles, Methods and Aplications; Whittles Publishing: Scotland, UK, 2006.
[18]
Brown, D.C. Decentering distortion of lenses. Photogram. Engineer.？1966, 32, 444–462.
[19]
Photomodeler 6.0. Eos Systems Inc. Available online: http://www.photomodeler.com (accessed on December 15, 2009).
[20]
L？be, T; F？rstner, W. Geometric Stability of Low-Cost Digital Consumer Cameras. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey; 2004; pp. 528–535.
[21]
Peipe, J.; Stephani, M. Performance evaluation of a 5 megapixel digital metric camera for use in architectural photogrammetry. In Proceedings of the XX International Congress for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Ancona, Italy; 2003; pp. 259–262.
