The controversy surrounding the “ground zero mosque” is part of a larger debate about the place of Islam in U.S. public space. The controversy also reveals the ways in which the boundaries of American identity continue to be debated, often through struggles over who counts as a “real” American. It further demonstrates the extent to which Islam is figured as un-American and militant, and also the extent to which all Muslims are required to account for the actions of those who commit violence under the rubric of Islam. This paper will discuss how, due to the events of September 11, 2001, Muslims have engaged in a process of indigenizing American Islam. It will argue that the Park51 Islamic Community Center (or Ground Zero mosque) is a reflection of this indigenization process. It will go on to argue that projects such as the Ground Zero mosque which try to establish Islam as an important part of the American religious landscape and insist on the freedom of worship as stated in the U.S. constitution, illustrate the ideological battlefield over the place of Islam in the U.S. The paper will also examine the possible ramifications of building the Park51 Islamic Community Center including how this will shape the role that Islam plays in the socio-political lives America Muslims.
References
[1]
Y.Y. Haddad. “American Foreign Policy in the Middle East and Its Impact on the Identity of Arab Muslims in the United States.” In The Muslims of America. Edited by Y.Y. Haddad. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 1991, pp. 225–226.
[2]
Y.Y. Haddad. Not Quite American? The Shaping of Arab and Muslim Identity in the United States. Waco, TX, USA: Baylor University Press, 2004, p. 17.
[3]
Y.Y. Haddad. Not Quite American? The Shaping of Arab and Muslim Identity. p. 20.
[4]
Y.Y. Haddad. Not Quite American? The Shaping of Arab and Muslim Identity. pp. 49–50.
[5]
Y.Y. Haddad. “American Foreign Policy in the Middle East.” In The Muslims of America. Edited by Y.Y. Haddad. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 220.
[6]
On the early history of the FIA seeG.M. Ahmed. “Muslim Organizations in the United States.” In The Muslims of America. Edited by Y.Y. Haddad. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 1991, pp. 12–14.
[7]
For a list of American Muslim organizations seeJ. Cesari. When Islam and Democracy Meet: Muslims in Europe and in the United States. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave, 2004, p. 185.
[8]
Y.Y. Haddad. Not Quite American?. Waco, TX, USA: Baylor University Press, 2004, p. 42.
[9]
A. Hussain. “Muslims, Pluralism, and Interfaith Dialogue.” In Progressive Muslims: On Justice, Gender, and Pluralism. Edited by O. Safi. Oxford, UK: Oneworld, 2003, p. 261.
[10]
G. Abdo. Mecca and Main Street: Muslim Life in America after 9/11. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 85.
[11]
Pew Research Center. “Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream.” http://pewresearch.org/pubs/483/muslim-americans (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[12]
Pew Research Center. “Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream.” http://pewresearch.org/pubs/483/muslim-americans [retrieved on 21 March 2011].
[13]
J. Cesari. When Islam and Democracy Meet. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave, 2004, p. 41.
[14]
http://www.newshounds.us/2010/10/20/can_we_expect_oreilly_to_grab_his_saw_and_hammer_to_help_build_the_ground_zero_mosque.php (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[15]
R. Sanchez. “Despite Protests, Mosque Plan Near 9/11 Site Wins Key Vote.” ABC News, 26 May 2010. 26 May 2010. Available online: http://abcnews.go.com/US/mosque-plan-clears-hurdle-protests/story?id=10747570 (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[16]
J.C. Hernandez. “Mosque Near Ground Zero Clears Key Hurdle.” The New York Times, 3 August 2010. 3 August 2010. Available online: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/03/mosque-near-ground-zero-clears-key-hurdle/ (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[17]
Park 51. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park51 (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[18]
M. Barbaro. “Debate Heats Up About Mosque Near Ground Zero.” The New York Times, 30 July 2010. 30 July 2010. Available online: http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/07/31/nyregion/31mosque.html (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[19]
Rasmussen Reports.com. “Rasmussen Poll: Most Oppose Mosque Near Ground Zero.” 22 July 2010. http://www.myfoxny.com/dpps/news/local_news/manhattan/Rasmussen-Poll-Most-Oppose-Mosque-Near-Ground-Zero_8789239 (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[20]
The AmLaw Daily. “Ted Olson Joins NYC Mosque Debate author= Brian Baxter.” http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2010/08/tedolsonmosque.html (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[21]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park51#cite_note-nytimes4-85 (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[22]
The “Ground Zero Mosque” Controversy and “Post-Race” Racism; Evelyn Alsultany. http://hemisphericinstitute.org/devotion/2010/10/the-%E2%80%9Cground-zero-mosque%E2%80%9D-controversy-and-%E2%80%9Cpost-race%E2%80%9D-racism/ (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[23]
S. Omid. Good Sufi, Bad Muslims; University of Chicago's Martin Marty Center Journal. http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2011/0127.shtml January 2011 (accessed on 21 March 2011).
[24]
B. Mohamed, and J. O'Brien. “Ground Zero of Misunderstanding. Cultural Reviews.” Contexts？1？(2010): 62–64.
[25]
L. Takim. “From Conversion to Conversation: Interfaith Dialogue in Post-911 America.” The Muslim World？3？(2004): 343–355.
[26]
On the difference between indigenization and assimilation, seeJ. Sherman. Islam and the Blackamerican: Looking Toward the Third Resurrection. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 169.
[27]
See alsoA. Mazrui. “Muslims between the Jewish Example and the Black Experience: American Policy Implications.” In Muslims' Place in the American Public Square. Edited by Z.H. Bukhari, S. Nyang, M. Ahmad, and J.L. Esposito. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: AltaMira Press, 2004, p. 127.
[28]
For rules on dialogue, seeD. Bryant. “Overcoming History: On the Possibilities of Muslim-Christian Dialogue.” In Muslim-Christian Dialogue. Edited by D. Bryant, and S.A. Ali. St. Paul, MN, USA: Paragon House, 1998, p. 34.
[29]
D. Chappell. “Interreligious Dialogue, Globalization, and Human Rights: Buddhist Reflections on Interdependence and the Declaration.” In Human Rights and Responsibilities in the World Religions. Edited by J. Runzo, N. Martin, and A. Sharma. Oxford, UK: Oneworld, 2003, p. 191.
[30]
See the example cited byM. Gopin. Holy War, Holy Peace: How Religion Can Bring Peace to the Middle East. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 44.
[31]
The root of the term tolerance comes from the medieval toxicology and pharmacology, marking how much poison a body could tolerate before it would succumb to death. SeeO. Safi. “Introduction: The Times are A-Changing; - A Muslim Quest for Justice, Gender Equality, and Pluralism.” In Progessive Muslims. Edited by O. Safi. Oxford, UK: Oneworld, 2003, p. 24.
[32]
M. Volf. Exclusion and Embrace, A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness and Reconciliation. Nashville, TN, USA: Abingdon, 1996.
