In forward osmosis (FO), an osmotic pressure gradient generated across a semi-permeable membrane is used to generate water transport from a dilute feed solution into a concentrated draw solution. This principle has shown great promise in the areas of water purification, wastewater treatment, seawater desalination and power generation. To ease optimization and increase understanding of membrane systems, it is desirable to have a comprehensive model that allows for easy investigation of all the major parameters in the separation process. Here we present experimental validation of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model developed to simulate FO experiments with asymmetric membranes. Simulations are compared with experimental results obtained from using two distinctly different complex three-dimensional membrane chambers. It is found that the CFD model accurately describes the solute separation process and water permeation through membranes under various flow conditions. It is furthermore demonstrated how the CFD model can be used to optimize membrane geometry in such as way as to promote the mass transfer.
References
[1]
McGinnis, R.L.; Elimelech, M. Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007, 207, 370–382, doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.012.
[2]
Cath, T.Y.; Childress, A.E.; Elimelech, M. Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281, 70–87, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048.
[3]
Achilli, A.; Cath, T.Y.; Marchand, E.A.; Childress, A.E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009, 239, 10–21, doi:10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.022.
[4]
Holloway, R.W.; Childress, A.E.; Dennett, K.E.; Cath, T.Y. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res. 2007, 41, 4005–4014, doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.054.
[5]
Tang, C.Y.; She, Q.; Lay, W.C.L.; Wang, R.; Fane, A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354, 123–133, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.059.
[6]
Mi, B.; Elimelech, M. Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348, 337–345, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.021.
[7]
Lee, S.; Boo, C.; Elimelech, M.; Hong, S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365, 34–39, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.036.
[8]
Hélix-Nielsen, C. Osmotic water purification: Insights from nanoscale biomimetics. Environ. Nano Technol. 2010, 1, 58–66.
[9]
McCutcheon, J.R.; Elimelech, M. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2007, 53, 1736–1744, doi:10.1002/aic.11197.
Zydney, A.L. Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130, 275–281, doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00006-9.
[13]
Kim, S.; Hoek, E.M.V. Modeling concentration polarization in reverse osmosis processes. Desalination 2005, 186, 111–128, doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.05.017.
[14]
Lee, K.L.; Baker, R.W.; Lonsdale, H.K. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8, 141–171, doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82088-8.
[15]
Loeb, S.; Titelman, L.; Korngold, E.; Freiman, J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129, 243–249, doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00354-7.
[16]
Brian, P.L.T. Concentration polarization in reverse osmosis desalination with variable flux and incomplete salt rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1965, 4, 439, doi:10.1021/i160016a014.
[17]
Yeh, H.M.; Cheng, T.W. Analysis of the slip effect on the permeate flux in membrane ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 154, 41–51.
[18]
Chellam, S.; Wiesner, M.R.; Dawson, C. Slip at a uniformly porous boundary: Effect on fluid flow and mass transfer. J. Eng. Math. 1992, 26, 481–492.
[19]
Youm, K.H.; Fane, A.G.; Wiley, D.E. Effects of natural convection instability on membrane performance in dead-end and cross-flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 116, 229–241, doi:10.1016/0376-7388(96)00047-6.
[20]
Wiley, D.E.; Fletcher, D.F. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow and permeation for pressure-driven membrane processes. Desalination 2002, 145, 183–186, doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00406-X.
[21]
Wiley, D.E.; Fletcher, D.F. Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211, 127–137, doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00412-X.
[22]
Wardeh, S.; Morvan, H.P. CFD simulations of flow and concentration polarization in spacer-filled channels for application to water desalination. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2008, 86, 1107–1116, doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2008.04.010.
[23]
Fimbres-Weihs, G.A.; Wiley, D.E. Review of 3D CFD modeling of flow and mass transfer in narrow spacer-filled channels in membrane modules. Chem. Eng. Process. 2010, 49, 759–781, doi:10.1016/j.cep.2010.01.007.
[24]
Gruber, M.F.; Johnson, C.J.; Yde, L.; Hèlix-Nielsen, C. Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations of flow and concentration polarization in forward osmosis membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 379, 488–495, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.022.
[25]
Fletcher, D.F.; Wiley, D.E. A computational fluids dynamics study of buoyancy effects in reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 245, 175–181, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.07.023.
[26]
Roache, P.J. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 1997, 29, 123–160, doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123.
[27]
Geraldes, V.; Semiao, V.; de Pinho, M.N. Flow and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 191, 109–128, doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00458-6.
[28]
Baker, R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004.
Issa, R.I. Solution of the implicitly discretized fluid-flow equations by operator-splitting. J. Comput. Phys. 1986, 62, 40–65, doi:10.1016/0021-9991(86)90099-9.
[31]
Press, W.H.; Teukolsky, S.; Vetterling, W.; Flannery, B. Numerical Recipes, the Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[32]
Wei, J.; Qiu, C.; Tang, C.Y.; Wang, R.; Fane, A.G. Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372, 292–302, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.013.
[33]
Iwatsu, R.; Hyun, J.M.; Kuwahara, K. Analyses of three-dimensional flow calculations in a driven cavity. Fluid Dynam. Res. 1990, 6, 91–102, doi:10.1016/0169-5983(90)90030-3.
[34]
Fimbres-Weihs, G.A.; Wiley, D.E. Numerical study of mass transfer in three-dimensional spacer-filled narrow channels with steady flow. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 306, 228–243, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.08.043.
[35]
Hoek, E.M.V.; Kim, A.S.; Elimelech, M. Influence of crossflow membrane filter geometry and shear rate on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis and nanofiltration separations. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 19, 357–372, doi:10.1089/109287502320963364.
[36]
McCutcheon, J.R.; Elimelech, M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284, 237–247, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049.
