This study focused on phase separation of activated sludge mixed liquor by flat-sheet membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A 20 liter working volume lab-scale MBR incorporating immersed PTFE flat-sheet membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm) was operated for 19 days treating a synthetic wastewater. The experiment was interrupted twice at days 5 and 13 when the modules were removed and cleaned physically and chemically in sequence. The pure water permeate flux of each membrane module was measured before and after each cleaning step to calculate membrane resistances. Results showed that fouling of membrane modules with 0.3 μm pore size was more rapid than other membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.5 and 1.0 μm). On the other hand, it was not clear whether fouling of the 0.5 μm membrane module was more severe than that of the 1.0 μm membrane module. This was partly because of the membrane condition after chemical cleaning, which seemed to determine the fouling of those modules over the next period. When irreversible resistance ( Ri) i.e., differences in membrane resistance before use and after chemical cleaning was high, the transmembrane pressure increased quickly during the next period irrespective of membrane pore size.
References
[1]
Xue, Y.; Yang, F.; Liu, S.; Fu, Z. The influence of controlling factors on the start-up and operation for partial nitrification in membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1055–1060, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.052.
[2]
Meng, F.G.; Yang, F.L.; Shi, B.Q.; Zhang, H.M. A comprehensive study on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors operated under different aeration intensities. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 59, 91–100, doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.040.
[3]
Le-Clech, P.; Chen, V.; Fane, T.A.G. Fouling in membranebioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284, 17–53, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019.
[4]
Yang, W.; Cicek, N.; Ilg, J. State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: Worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 270, 201–211, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.010.
[5]
Yamato, N.; Kimura, K.; Miyoshi, T.; Watanabe, Y. Difference in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) caused by membrane polymer materials. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280, 911–919, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.009.
[6]
Choi, J.-H.; Ng, H.Y. Effect of membrane type and material on performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 853–859, doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.029.
[7]
Liao, B.Q.; Bagley, D.M.; Kraemer, H.E.; Leppard, G.G.; Liss, S.N. A review of biofouling and its control in membrane separation bioreactors. Water Environ. Res. 2004, 76, 425–436, doi:10.2175/106143004X151527.
[8]
Choi, J.-H.; Park, S.-K.; Ng, H.-Y. Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor using track-etched and phase-inversed porous membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 65, 184–192, doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2008.10.019.
[9]
Ou, S.-H.; You, S.-J.; Lee, Y.-C. Extracellular polymeric substance characteristics and fouling formation mechanisms in submerged membrane bioreactors. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010, 18, 175–181.
[10]
Astm F316-86, Standard Test Methods for Pore Size Characteristics of Membrane Filters by Bubble Point and Mean Flow Pore Test; ASTM Committee on Standards: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1986.
[11]
Nagashima, A. Viscosity of water substance-new international formulation and its background. J.Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1977, 6, 1133–1166, doi:10.1063/1.555562.
[12]
American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
[13]
van der Marel, P.; Zwijnenburg, A.; Kemperman, A.; Wessling, M.; Temmink, H.; van der Meer, W. Influence of membrane properties on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348, 66–74, doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.054.
[14]
Fan, B.; Huang, X. Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 5245–5251, doi:10.1021/es025789n.
