Recent discussions on REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, plus conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks) have raised optimism about reducing carbon emissions and deforestation in tropical countries. If approved under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), REDD+ mechanisms may generate a substantial influx of financial resources to developing countries. Some authors argue that this money could reverse the ongoing process of decentralization of forest policies that has spread through a large number of developing countries in the past two decades. Central states will be accountable for REDD+ money, and may be compelled to control and keep a significant share of REDD+ funds. Supporters of decentralization argue that centralized implementation of REDD+ will be ineffective and inefficient. In this paper, I examine the relation between subnational governments and REDD+ in Brazil. Data show that some state governments in the Brazilian Amazon have played a key role in creating protected areas (PAs) after 2003, which helped decrease deforestation rates. Governors have different stimuli for creating PAs. Some respond to the needs of their political constituency; others have expectations to boost the forest sector so as to increase fiscal revenues. Governors also have led the discussion on REDD+ in Brazil since 2008. Considering their interests and political power, REDD+ is unlikely to curb decentralization in Brazil.
References
[1]
Santilli, M.; Moutinho, P.; Schwartzman, S.; Nepstad, D.; Curran, L.; Nobre, C. Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol: An editorial essay. Climatic Change？2005, 71, 267–276.
[2]
Nepstad, D.; Soares-Filho, B.S.; Merry, F.; Lima, A.; Moutinho, P.; Carter, J.; Bowman, M.; Cattaneo, A.; Rodrigues, H.; Schwartzman, S.; et al. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science？2009, 326, 1350–1351.
[3]
Phelps, J.; Webb, E.L.; Agrawal, A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science？2010, 328, 312–313.
[4]
Irawan, S.; Tacconi, L. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and decentralized forest management. Int. Forest. Rev.？2010, 11, 427–438, doi:10.1505/ifor.11.4.427.
[5]
Rondinelli, D. Government decentralization in comparative perspective: theory and practice in developing countries. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci.？1981, 2, 133–145.
[6]
Parker, A. Decentralization: The Way Forward for Rural Development?. Policy Research Working Paper 1475; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
[7]
Manor, J. The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
[8]
Ribot, J.C. Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[9]
Toni, F.; Kaimowitz, D. O papel dos municípios na gest？o florestal: li？？es dos estudos de caso. In Municípios e gest？o florestal na Amaz？nia; Toni, F., Kaimowitz, D., Eds.; A.S. Editores: Natal, Brazil, 2003; pp. 23–63.
[10]
Toni, F.; Pacheco, P. Gest？o ambiental descentralizada: um estudo comparativo de três municípios da Amaz？nia Brasileira; Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, Brazil, 2005.
[11]
Valle, R.S.T.; Yamada, E.M. Brasil: Titularidade Indígena sobre Créditos de Carbono gerados por Atividades Florestais em Terras Indígenas. Parecer Jurídico sobre a titularidade de Créditos de Carbono gerados por atividades florestais em Terras Indígenas no Brasil; Instituto Socioambiental: Brasília, Brazil, 2010.
[12]
Nepstad, D.; Schwartzman, S.; Bamberger, B.; Santilli, M.; Ray, D.; Schlesinger, P.; Lefebvre, P.; Alencar, A.; Prinz, E.; Fiske, G.; Rolla, A. Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conserv. Biol.？2006, 20, 65–73.
[13]
Larson, A.M.; Ribot, J.C. Lessons from forestry decentralisation. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W.D., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Eds.; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009; pp. 175–187.
[14]
Nickson, R.A. Local Government in Latin America; Lynne Rienner Publishers: Boulder, CO, USA and London, UK, 1995.
[15]
Stepan, A. Para uma nova análise comparativa do federalismo e da democracia: federa？？es que restringem ou ampliam o poder do demos. Dados？1999, 42, 197–251.
[16]
Abrucio, F.L. Os bar？es da federa？？o e a redemocratiza？？o Brasileira; Hucitec: S？o Paulo, Brazil, 1998.
[17]
Article 23 of the Constitution lists as state duties the protection of sites of scenic beauty and archaeological sites (point III); environmental protection and the fight against contamination (point VI); preservation of forests, fauna and flora (point VII); and the registry, follow-up and inspection of water and mineral resources (point XI). Article 24 deals with urban planning rights (point I); forests, hunting, fishing, fauna, natural conservation, defence of the soil and natural resources, environmental protection and control of contamination (point VII); landscape patrimony (point VII); and responsibility for damage to the environment (point VIII).
[18]
Hochstetler, K.; Keck, M.E. Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2007.
[19]
Jenkins, C.N.; Joppa, L. Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biol. Cons.？2009, 142, 2166–2174.
[20]
Ferreira, L.V.; Venticinque, E.; Almeida, S. O desmatamento na Amaz？nia e a importancia das áreas protegidas. Estud. Av.？2005, 19, 157–166.
[21]
Soares-Filho, B.; Moutinho, P.; Nepstad, D.; Anderson, A.; Rodrigues, H.; Garcia, R.; Dietzsch, L.; Merry, F.; Bowman, M.; Hissa, L.; et al. Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA？2010, 107, 10821–10826.
[22]
Brazilian protected areas (PAs) are divided in two groups: strict use PAs and sustainable use PAs. Strict use PAs aim to preserve nature and, therefore, allow only indirect use of natural resources. There are five categories of strict use PAs: ecological stations and biological reserves, in which only scientific and educational activities are allowed, and national parks, natural monuments and wildlife refuges, which also allow public access. Sustainable use PAs aim to reconcile conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. There are seven categories of sustainable use PAs, including extractive reserves and national forests, which together comprise the largest share of sustainable use PAs in Brazilian Amazon. Residents of extractive reserves can manage the forest for timber and non-timber products and can manage small agricultural plots. Cattle ranching is illegal in such areas.
[23]
Data shown on Figures 1–3 and on Table 2 draw on data obtained from Instituto Socioambiental, and refer to area of PAs as of 2009 Data discount overlaps between PAs. Available online: http://www.socioambiental.org/loja/detalhe_produto.html?id_prd=10333 (accessed on 1 August 2010)
[24]
Toni, F. Gest？o florestal na Amaz？nia brasileira: avan？os e obstáculos em um sistema federalista; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2006.
[25]
Ferreira, I.N.R. Parcerias para a gest？o ambiental em propriedades rurais: O caso de Lucas do Rio Verde—MT; Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Universidade de Brasília: Brasília, Brazil, 2010.
[26]
Muanis, M.M. Quanto custa uma unidade de conserva？？o federal?: uma vis？o estratégica para o financiamento do Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conserva？？o (Snuc); Funbio: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009.
[27]
Toni, F.; Santos, J.C.; Menezes, R.S.; Wood, C.H.; Sant'Ana, H. Expans？o e trajetórias da pecuária na Amaz？nia: Acre, Brasil; Editora UnB: Brasília, Brazil, 2007.
[28]
Sillsa, E.; Shubhayu, S. Subsidies for rubber: Conserving rainforests while sustaining livelihoods in the Amazon? J. Sustain. Forest.？2010, 29, 152–173.
[29]
MINISTéRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Pilares para a Sustentabilidade Financeira do Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conserva？？o; Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, Brazil, 2009.
[30]
GCF. Governors' Climate and Forests Taskforce homepage. Available online: http://gcftaskforce.org/index.html (accessed on 2 June 2010).
