Reducing emissions from agriculture, forestry, and other land uses is considered an essential ingredient of an effective strategy to mitigate global warming. Required changes in land use and forestry, however, often imply foregoing returns from locally more attractive resource use strategies. We assess and compare the prospects of mitigating climate change through emission reductions from forestry and agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon. We use official statistics, literature, and case study material from both old and new colonization frontiers to identify the scope for emission reductions, in terms of potential additionality, opportunity costs, technological complexity, transaction costs, and risks of economic and environmental spillover effects. Our findings point to a comparative advantage in the Brazilian Amazon of forest conservation-based over land-use modifying mitigation options, especially in terms of higher potential additionality in emission reductions. Low-cost mitigation options do exist also in use-modifying agriculture and forestry, but tend to be technologically complex thus requiring more costly intervention schemes. Our review points to a series of regional development deficits that may come to hamper attempts to tap into the large-scale climate change mitigation potential often associated with the Amazon. Low-hanging fruits for mitigation do exist, but must be carefully identified based on the performance indicators we discuss.
References
[1]
Van der Werf, G.R.; Morton, D.C.; DeFries, R.S.; Olivier, G.J.; Kasibhatla, P.S.; Jackson, R.B.; Collatz, G.J.; Randerson, J.T. CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geosci. 2009, 2, 737–738.
[2]
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[3]
DeFries, R.; Rosenzweig, C. Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107, 19627–19632, doi:10.1073/pnas.1011163107.
[4]
Lopes, P.A. Is REDD accounting myopic: Why reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation programs should recognize and include other ecosystems and services beyond CO2 sequestration. Sustain. Dev. Law Policy 2012, 11, 25–32.
[5]
Zilberman, D.; Lipper, L.; McCarthy, N. When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor? Environ. Dev. Econ. 2008, 13, 255–278.
[6]
Wunder, S.; B？rner, J. Payments for environmental services to mitigate climate change: Agriculture and forestry compared. In Climate Change Mitigation and Agriculture; Wollenberg, E., Ed.; Earthscan: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 170–180.
[7]
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Home Page. Available online: http://cdm.unfccc.int (accessed on 24 July 2012).
[8]
Michaelowa, A.; Jotzo, F. Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 511–523, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.016.
[9]
Arag？o, L.E.O.C.; Shimabukuro, Y.E. The incidence of fire in Amazonian forests with implications for REDD. Science 2010, 328, 1275–1278.
[10]
Numata, I.; Cochrane, M.A.; Souza, C.M., Jr.; Sales, M.H. Carbon emissions from deforestation and forest fragmentation in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 044003:1–044003:7.
[11]
Galford, G.L.; Melilloa, J.M.; Kicklightera, D.E.; Cronina, C.E.P.; Mustardb, J.F.; Cerrid, C.C. Greenhouse gas emissions from alternative futures of deforestation and agricultural management in the southern Amazon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 19649–19654.
[12]
Bowman, M.S.; Soares-Filhob, B.S.; Merrye, F.D.; Nepstadc, D.C.; Rodriguesb, H.; Almeidac, O.T. Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: A spatial analysis of the rationale for beef production. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 558–568.
[13]
Vosti, S. Intensifying small-scale agriclture in the Western Amazon: Issues, implications, and implementation. In Tradeoffs or Synergies: Agricultural Intensification, Economic Development and the Environment; Lee, D.R., Barret, H.R., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Oxon, UK, 2001; pp. 245–266.
[14]
B？rner, J.; Mendoza, A.; Vosti, S.A. Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships and policy prescriptions. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64, 356–373.
[15]
Barona, E.; Ramankutty, N.; Hyman, G. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 024002:1–024002:9.
[16]
Matricardi, E.A.T.; Skoleb, D.L.; Pedlowskic, M.A.; Chomentowskib, W.; Fernandesd, L.C. Assessment of tropical forest degradation by selective logging and fire using Landsat imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 1117–1129.
[17]
Saatchi, S.S.; Houghton, R.A.; dos santos Alvalá, R.C.; Soares, J.V.; Yu, Y. Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007, 13, 816–837.
[18]
Saatchi, S.S.; Nancy L. Harrisc, N.L.; Brownc, S.; Lefskyd, M.; Mitcharde, E.T.A.; Salasf, W.; Zuttaa, B.R.; Buermannb, W.; Lewisg, S.L.; Hagenf, S.; Petrovac, S.; Whiteh, L.; Silmani, M.; Morelj, A. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9899–9904.
[19]
Denich, M.; Kanashiro, M.; Vlek, P.L.G. The potential and dynamics of carbon sequestration in traditional and modified fallow systems of the Eastern Amazon region, Brazil. In Global Climate Change and Tropical Ecosystems; Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Stewart, B.A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999; pp. 213–229.
[20]
Nepstad, D.C.; de Carvalho, C.R.; Davidsonet, E.A.; Jipp, P.H.; Lefebvre, P.A.; Negreiros, G.H.; da Silva, E.D.; Stone, T.A.; Trumbore, S.E.; Vieira, S. The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures. Nature 1994, 372, 666–669.
[21]
Sommer, R.; Denich, M.; Vlek, P.L.G. Carbon storage and root penetration in deep soils under small-farmer land-use systems in the Eastern Amazon region, Brazil. Plant Soil 2000, 219, 231–241.
[22]
Feldpausch, T.R.; Rondon, M.A.; Fernandes, E.C.M.; Riha, S.J.; Wandelli, E. Carbon and nutrient accumulation in secondary forests regenerating on pastures in central amazonia. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14, 164–176.
[23]
H？lscher, D.; M？ller, R.F.; Denich, M.; F？lster, H. Nutrient input-output budget of shifting agriculture in Eastern Amazonia. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 1996, 47, 49–57.
[24]
Mosier, A.; Wassmann, R.; Verchot, L.; King, J.; Palm, C. Methane and nitrogen oxide fluxes in tropical agricultural soils: Sources, sinks and mechanisms. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2004, 6, 11–49.
[25]
Cerri, C.C.; Bernoux, M.; Maia, S.M.F.; Cerri, C.E.P.; Costa, C., Jr.; Feigl, B.J.; Frazao, L.A.; Mello, F.F.D.C.; Galdos, M.V.; Moreira, C.S.; Carvalho, J.L.N. Greenhouse gas mitigation options in Brazil for land-use change, livestock and agriculture. Sci. Agric. 2010, 67, 102–116.
[26]
Gerwing, J.J. Degradation of forests through logging and fire in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 157, 131–141, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00644-7.
[27]
Chomitz, K.M. At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[28]
Wunder, S.; B？rner, J.; Tito, M.R.; Pereira, L. Pagamentos por servi？os ambientais: Perspectivas para a Amaz？nia in Série Estudos 10 (in Portuguese); Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, Brasil, 2008.
[29]
Davidson, E.A.; de Abreu-Sá, T.D.; Carvalho, C.J.R.; Figuereido, R.D.O.; Kato, M.D.S.A.; Kato, O.R.; Ishida, F.Y. An integrated greenhouse gas assessment of an alternative to slash-and-burn agriculture in eastern Amazonia. Gobl. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14, 998–1007.
[30]
Fearnside, P.M. Global warming response options in Brazil’s forest sector: Comparison of project-level costs and benefits. Biomass Bioenergy 1995, 8, 309–322, doi:10.1016/0961-9534(95)00024-0.
[31]
Mutuo, P.; Cadisch, G.; Albrecht, A.; Palm, C.; Verchot, L. Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2005, 71, 43–54, doi:10.1007/s10705-004-5285-6.
[32]
B？rner, J.; Wunder, S. Mitigation options from forestry and agriculture in the Amazon. In Climate Change Mitigation and Agriculture; Wollenberg, E., Ed.; Earthscan: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 399–410.
[33]
Kauffman, B.J.; Cummings, D.L.; Ward, D.E. Fire in the Brazilian Amazon 2: Biomass, nutrient pools and losses in cattle pastures. Oecologia 1998, 113, 415–427.
[34]
Guild, L.S.; Kauffman, J.B.; Ellingson, L.J.; Cummings, D.L.; Castro, E.A.; Babbitt, R.E.; Ward, D.E. Dynamics associated with total aboveground biomass, C, nutrient pools, and biomass burning of primary forest and pasture in Rond？nia, Brazil during SCAR-B. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 32091–32100.
[35]
Fearnside, P.M. Amazonian deforestation and global warming: Carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil’s Amazon forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 1996, 80, 21–34, doi:10.1016/0378-1127(95)03647-4.
[36]
Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[37]
White, D.S.; Labarta, R.A.; Leguia, E.J. Technology adoption by resource-poor farmers: Considering the implications of peak-season labor costs. Agric. Syst. 2005, 85, 183–201, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2004.07.018.
[38]
Mercer, D.E. Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: A review. Agrofor. Syst. 2004, 61–62, 311–328.
[39]
Fuglie, K.O.; Kascak, C.A. Adoption and diffusion of natural-resource-conserving agricultural technology. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2001, 23, 386–403.
[40]
Lee, D.R. Agricultural sustainability and technology adoption: Issues and policies for developing countries. Am. J.Agric. Econ. 2005, 87, 1325–1334.
[41]
B？rner, J.; Wunder, S.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.; Tito, M.R.; Pereira, L.; Nascimento, N. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1272–1282.
[42]
Nepstad, D.; Soares-Filho, B.S.; Merry, F.; Lima, A.; Moutinho, P.; Carter, J.; Bowman, M.; Cattaneo, A.; Rodrigues, H.; Schwartzman, S.; McGrath, D.G.; Stickler, C.M.; Lubowski, R.; Piris-Cabezas, P.; Rivero, S.; Alencar, A.; Almeida, O.; Stella, O. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 2009, 326, 1350–1351.
[43]
Yokoyama, L.P.; Silveira, P.M.d.; Stone, L.F. Rentabilidade das culturas de milho, soja e trigo em diferentes sistemas de preparo do solo (in Portuguese). Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2002, 32, 75–79.
[44]
Machado, P.; Silva, C. Soil management under no-tillage systems in the tropics with special reference to Brazil. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2001, 61, 119–130.
[45]
Fearnside, P.M. Can pasture intensification discourage deforestation in the Amazon and Pantanal regions of Brazil. In Deforestation and Land Use in the Amazon; Wood, C.H., Porro, R., Eds.; University Press of Florida: Florida, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 299–314.
[46]
Costa, F.D.A. Dinamica agrária e balan？o de carbono na Amaz？nia (in Portuguese). Rev. Econ. A 2009, 10, 117–151.
[47]
Rueda, B.L.; Blake, R.W.; Nicholson, C.F.; Fox, D.G.; Tedeschi, L.O.; Pell, A.N.; Fernandes, E.C.M.; Valentim, J.F.; Carneiro, J.C. Production and economic potentials of cattle in pasture-based systems of the western Amazon region of Brazil. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 2923–2937.
[48]
Faminow, M.D. Cattle, Deforestation and Development in the Amazon: An Economic, Agronomic and Environmental Perspective; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2000.
[49]
Denich, M.; Vielhauer, K.; Kato, M.S.D.A.; Block, A.; Kato, O.R.; de Abreu-Sá, T.D.; Lücke, W.; Vlek, P.L.G. Mechanized land preparation in forest-based fallow systems: The experience from Eastern Amazonia. Agrofor. Syst. 2004, 61–62, 91–106.
[50]
B？rner, J.; Denich, M.; Mendoza-Escalante, A.; Hedden-Dunkhorst, B.; Abreu-Sá, T. Alternatives to slash-and-burn in forest-based fallow systems of the eastern Brazilian Amazon region: Technology and policy options to halt ecological degradation and improve rural welfare. In Stability of Tropical Rainforest Margins; Zeller, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 333–361.
[51]
Kato, M.S.A.; Kato, O.R.; Denich, M.; Vlek, P.L.G. Fire-free alternatives to slash-and-burn for shifting cultivation in the eastern Amazon region: the role of fertilizers. Field Crops Res. 1999, 62, 225–237.
[52]
Fatos e Números do Brasil Florestal (in Portuguese); Sociedade Brasileira de Silvicultura: S？o Paulo, Brazil, 2008; p. 93.
[53]
Bauhus, J.; van der Meer, P.; Kanninen, M. Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010.
[54]
Stape, J.L.; Binkley, D.; Ryan, M.G. Eucalyptus production and the supply, use and efficiency of use of water, light and nitrogen across a geographic gradient in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 193, 17–31.
[55]
Souza, C.R.D.; Rossi, L.M.B.; de Azevedo, C.P.; de Lima, R.M.B. Behaviour of Acacia mangium and clones of Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla in experimental plantations in Central Amaz？nia. Sci. For. 2004, 65, 95–101.
[56]
Ministério da Agricultura: Sistemas de Producao Home Page (in Portuguese). Available online: http://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br (accessed on 24 July 2012).
[57]
Yamada, M.; Gholz, H. An evaluation of agroforestry systems as a rural development option for the Brazilian Amazon. Agrofor. Syst. 2002, 55, 81–87, doi:10.1023/A:1020523107243.
[58]
Bentes-Gama, M.D.M.; de Silva, M.L.; Vilcahuaman, L.J.M.; Locatelli, M. Análise econ？mica de sistemas agroflorestais na Amaz？nia ocidental, Machadinho d’Oeste-RO (in Portuguese). Rev. árvore 2005, 29, 401–411.
[59]
Hoch, L. Do Smallholders in the Amazon Benefit from Tree Growing; Albert-Ludwigs-Universit？t Freiburg: Breisgau, Germany, 2009.
[60]
Holmes, T.P.; Blate, G.M.; Zweede, J.C.; Pereira, R., Jr.; Barreto, P.; Boltz, F. Custos e Benefícios Financeiros da Explora？？o Florestal de Impacto Reduzido em Compara？？o à Explora？？o Florestal Convencional na Amaz？nia Oriental (in Portuguese); Funda？？o Floresta Tropical: Belém, Brazil, 2004.
[61]
Pokorny, B.; Steinbrenner, M. Collaborative monitoring of production and costs of timber harvest operations in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10, 1–21.
[62]
Boletim Mercado Florestal Certificado (in Portuguese); WWF-Brazil: Brasilia, Brazil, 2008; p. 7.
[63]
Vosti, S.; Witcover, J.; Oliveira, S.; Faminow, M. Policy issues in agroforestry: Technology adoption and regional integration in the western Brazilian Amazon. Agrofor. Syst. 1997, 38, 195–222, doi:10.1023/A:1005921917359.
[64]
Smith, N.J.H.; Falesi, I.C.; Alvim, P.D.T.; Serr？o, E.A.S. Agroforestry trajectories among smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon: Innovation and resiliency in pioneer and older settled areas. Ecol. Econ. 1996, 18, 15–27.
[65]
Hoch, L.; Pokorny, B.; de Jong, W. How successful is tree growing for smallholders in the Amazon? Int. For. Rev. 2009, 11, 299–310.
[66]
Costa, F.D.A. Quest？o agrária e macropolíticas para a Amaz？nia (in Portuguese). Estud. Av. 2005, 19, 131–156, doi:10.1590/S0103-40142005000100009.
[67]
Smith, N.J.H.; Fik, T.J.; Alvim, P.T.; Falesi, I.C.; Serrao, E.A.S. Agroforestry developments and potential in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Degrad. Dev. 1995, 6, 251–263, doi:10.1002/ldr.3400060406.
[68]
Siegmund-Schultze, M.; Rischkowsky, B.; da Veiga, J.B.; King, J.M. Cattle are cash generating assets for mixed smallholder farms in the Eastern Amazon. Agric. Syst. 2007, 94, 738–749.
[69]
B？rner, J.; Vosti, S. Managing tropical forest ecosystem services: An overview of options. In Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services; Muradian, R., Rival, L., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012. in press.
[70]
Cacho, O.; Marshall, G.R.; Milne, M. Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink projects in developing countries. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2005, 10, 597–614.
[71]
Brito, B.; Barreto, P. A eficácia da aplica？？o da lei de crimes ambientais pelo Ibama para prote？？o de florestas no Pará (in Portuguese). Rev. Direito Ambient. 2006, 43, 35–65.
[72]
Soares-Filho, B.S.; Nepstad, D.C.; Curran, L.M.; Cerqueira, G.C.; Garcia, R.A.; Ramos, C.A.; Voll, E.; McDonald, A.; Lefebvre, A.P.; Schlesinger, P. Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 2006, 440, 520–523.
[73]
Nelson, A. Travel time to major cities: A global map of Accessibility. Available online: http://bioval.jrc.ec.europa.eu/products/gam/index.htm (accessed on 5 July 2012).
[74]
Viana, V.; Grieg-Gran, M.; Mea, R.D.; Ribenboim, G. The Costs of REDD: Lessons from the Amazon; Brief Report 17076IIED; IIED: London, UK, 2009.
[75]
Barros, E.; Grimaldi, M.; Sarrazin, M.; Chauvel, A.; Mitja, D.; Desjardins, T.; Lavelle, P. Soil physical degradation and changes in macrofaunal communities in Central Amazon. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2004, 26, 157–168, doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.012.
[76]
Castro, M.; Singer, B. Agricultural settlement and soil quality in the Brazilian Amazon. Popul. Environ. 2012. in press.
[77]
Jackson, R.B.; Jobbagy, E.G.; Avissar, R.; Roy, S.B.; Barrett, D.J.; Cook, C.W.; Farley, K.A.; le Maitre, D.C.; McCarl, B.A.; Murray, B.C. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science 2005, 310, 1944–1947.
[78]
Carpentier, C.L.; Vosti, S.A.; Witcover, J. Intensified production systems on western Brazilian Amazon settlement farms: Could they save the forest. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 82, 73–88.
[79]
Carpentier, C.L.; Vosti, S.; Witcover, J. Small-scale farms in the western Brazilian Amazon: Can they benefit from carbon trade? In EPTD Discussion Papers; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
[80]
B？rner, J. A Bio-Economic Model of Small-Scale Farmers’ Land Use Decisions and Technology Choice in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon in Faculty of Agriculture; University of Bonn: Bonn, Germany, 2006.
[81]
Vosti, S.A.; Witcover, J.; Carpentier, C.L. Agricultural Intensification by Smallholders in the Western Amazon: From Deforestation to Sustainable Land Use; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
[82]
Cattaneo, A. Balancing Agricultural Development and Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon; International Food and Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
[83]
Freitas, C.M.D.; Giatti, L.L. Indicadores de sustentabilidade ambiental e de sa？ode na amaz？′nia legal, Brasil (in Portuguese). Cad. Sa？ode P？oblica 2009, 25, 1251–1266.
[84]
Rudel, T.K.; Schneider, L.; Uriarte, M.; Turner, B.L.; DeFries, R.; Lawrence, D.; Geoghegan, J.; Hecht, S.; Ickowitz, A.; Lambin, E.F.; Birkenholtz, T.; Baptista, S.; Grau, R. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20675–20680.
[85]
Angelsen, A.; Kaimowitz, D. Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation; CABI Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
[86]
Sohngen, B.; Brown, S. Measuring leakage from carbon projects in open economies: A stop timber harvesting project in Bolivia as a case study. Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34, 829–839, doi:10.1139/x03-249.
[87]
B？rner, J.; Wunder, S.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.; Hyman, G.; Nascimento, N. REDD sticks and carrots in the Brazilian Amazon: Assessing costs and livelihood implications. In CCAFS Working Paper; CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS): Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.
[88]
Duchelle, A.; Cromberg, M.; Gebara, M.F.; Guerra, R.; Melo, T.; Larson, A.; Cronkleton, P.; B？rner, J.; Sills, E.; Bauch, S.; May, P.; Selaya, G.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Wunder, S. Land tenure, carbon rights and livelihoods in the Brazilian Amazon: Learning from four incipient REDD+ initiatives. In Proceedings of LTC workshop on Land Tenure and Forest Carbon Management, Madison, WI, USA, 21–22 October 2011.
Brandon, K.E.; Wells, M. Planning for people and parks: Design dilemmas. World Dev. 1992, 20, 557–570, doi:10.1016/0305-750X(92)90044-V.
[91]
Weber, J.G.; Sills, E.O.; Bauch, S.; Pattanayak, S.K. Do ICDPs work? An empirical evaluation of forest-based microenterprises in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Econ. 2011, 87, 661–681.
[92]
Blom, B.; Sunderland, T.; Murdiyarso, D. Getting REDD to work locally: Lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environ. Sci. Policy 2010, 13, 164–172, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.002.
[93]
Pokorny, B.; Johnson, J.; Medina, G.; Hoch, L. Market-based conservation of the Amazonian forests: Revisiting win-win expectations. Geoforum 2012, 43, 387–401, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.002.
