全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Forests  2012 

Leakage Implications for European Timber Markets from Reducing Deforestation in Developing Countries

DOI: 10.3390/f3030736

Keywords: REDD, leakage, conservation, timber market

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Forest management strategies and policies such as REDD (reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) may have unintentional implications for forest sectors in countries not targeted by such policies. The success of a policy effort like REDD would result in a significant reduction in deforestation and forest degradation and an ensuing reduction in the supply of natural forest timber production within participating countries. This could in turn result in price increases, inducing a supply response outside project boundaries with possible implications for forest management as well as global carbon emissions. This paper reviews the literature to discern potential timber market implications for countries sourcing wood products from developing countries affected by REDD related conservation efforts. The literature reviewed shows varying degrees of market effects leakage—policy actions in one place creating incentives for third parties to increase timber harvesting elsewhere through the price mechanism—ranging from negligible to substantial. However, wood products in the studies reviewed are dealt with on quite an aggregated scale and are assumed to be more or less perfect substitutes for wood products outside conservation effort boundaries. The review suggests that a thorough mapping of the end-uses of tropical timber is needed to comprehensively analyze impacts on wood-product markets in regions such as Europe from conservation efforts in tropical developing countries. The types of tropical timber expected to be affected, in which applications they are used, which are the most likely substitutes and where they would be sourced, are issues that, along with empirical analysis of supply and demand price elasticities and degree of substitutability, should be investigated when assessing the overall effectiveness of REDD.

References

[1]  Binkley, C.S.; van Kooten, G.C. Integrating climatic change and forests: Economic and ecologic assessments. Clim. Chang. 1994, 28, 91–110, doi:10.1007/BF01094102.
[2]  European-Commission. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources; European-Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
[3]  UN-REDD. About the UN-REDD Programme; UN-REDD Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
[4]  Holmgren, L. International Forest Policy—An Overview; Report from the secretariat for international forestry issues; The Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry: Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.
[5]  UN-REDD. About REDD+; UN-REDD Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
[6]  Angelsen, A.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. What are the key design issues for REDD and the criteria for assessing options. In Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2008.
[7]  Murray, B.C. Leakage from an Avoided Deforestation Compensation Policy: Concepts, Empirical Evidence, and Corrective Policy Options; Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University: Durham, NC, USA, 2008.
[8]  Aukland, L.; Costa, P.M.; Brown, S. A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: The case of avoided deforestation. Clim. Policy 2003, 3, 123–136.
[9]  Schwarze, R.; Niles, J.O.; Olander, J. Understanding and managing leakage in forest-based greenhouse-gas-mitigation projects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Series A 2002, 360, 1685–1703, doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1040.
[10]  IPCC. Special Report on Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
[11]  Henders, S.; Ostwald, M. Forest carbon leakage quantification methods and their suitability for assessing leakage in REDD. Forests 2012, 3, 33–58, doi:10.3390/f3010033.
[12]  Sohngen, B.; Mendelsohn, R.; Sedjo, R. Forest management, conservation, and global timber markets. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1999, 81, 1–13, doi:10.2307/1244446.
[13]  Skutsch, M.M.; McCall, M.K. Reassessing REDD: Governance, markets and the hype cycle. Clim. Chang. 2010, 100, 395–402, doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9768-y.
[14]  McKinley, D.C.; Ryan, M.G.; Birdsey, R.A.; Giardina, C.P.; Harmon, M.E.; Heath, L.S.; Houghton, R.A.; Jackson, R.B.; Morrison, J.F.; Murray, B.C.; Pataki, D.E.; Skog, K.E. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 1902–1924.
[15]  Murray, B.C.; McCarl, B.A.; Lee, H.C. Estimating leakage from forest carbon sequestration programs. Land Econ. 2004, 80, 109–124, doi:10.2307/3147147.
[16]  Wear, D.N.; Murray, B.C. Federal timber restrictions, interregional spillovers, and the impact on US softwood markets. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2004, 47, 307–330, doi:10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00081-0.
[17]  Meyfroidt, P.; Rudel, T.K.; Lambin, E.F. Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107, 20917–20922, doi:10.1073/pnas.1014773107.
[18]  Gan, J.; McCarl, B.A. Measuring transnational leakage of forest conservation. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64, 423–432, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.032.
[19]  Clark, D. Forest Products Annual Market Review 2010–2011; Geneva Timber and Forest Study Paper #20123064737; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
[20]  Michetti, M.; Rosa, R. Michetti, M.; Rosa, R. Afforestation and Timber management compliance strategies in climate Policy-A Computable general equilibrium analysis. Clim. ChangeS, 2011. Available online: http://www.feem.it/userfiles/attach/2011118158514NDL2011-004.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2012). FEEM Note di lavoro No. 2011.004.
[21]  Bosello, F.; Eboli, F.; Parrado, R.; Rosa, R. EU-Mitigation, REDD and the Carbon Market: A General Equilibrium Assessment; CMCC Research Paper No. 94; Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici: Bologna, Italy, 2010. Available online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1676734 (accessed on 20 August 2012).
[22]  Sun, B.; Sohngen, B. Set-asides for carbon sequestration: Implications for permanence and leakage. Clim. Chang. 2009, 96, 409–419, doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9628-9.
[23]  Sohngen, B.; Brown, S. Measuring leakage from carbon projects in open economies: A stop timber harvesting project in Bolivia as a case study. Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34, 829–839, doi:10.1139/x03-249.
[24]  Magnani, F.; Dewar, R.C.; Borghetti, A. Leakage and spillover effects of forest management on carbon storage: Theoretical insights from a simple model. Tellus Ser. B 2009, 61, 385–393, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00386.x.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133