The REDD Programme is predicated on the assumption that developed countries will provide sufficient funds to offset opportunity costs associated with avoiding deforestation. The role of non-market values in indigenous land management may challenge the efficacy of compensation schemes targeted at meeting opportunity costs as calculated in traditional opportunity cost analysis (OCA). Furthermore it is unclear how these economic incentives might affect social and cultural values linked to land-use norms, livelihoods, and local governance. This study explores the economic, social and cultural values of forest uses for a Miskito community in the Rio Plátano Biosphere Reserve in Honduras. Data were collected using household surveys, farm visits, and community workshops. OCA indicates potential for successful REDD+ payment schemes; however it is an inadequate method to account for subsistence and cultural opportunity costs associated with avoided deforestation. Compensation to change land-use practices may undermine governance institutions necessary to address deforestation in the region. Our results indicate that small-scale agriculture and other forest-based subsistence activities are important cultural practices for maintaining Miskito identity and forest management institutions. Recommendations are offered for using OCA to develop REDD+ projects that recognize the linkages between social and cultural values and forest management by focusing on approaches that consider a full range of economic, social and cultural opportunity costs.
References
[1]
Solomon, S.D.; Qin, M.; Manning, Z.; Chen, M.; Marquis, K.B.; Averyt, M.; Miller, H.L. Contribution of Working Group I. to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge Press University: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[2]
White, D.; Minang, P. Estimating the Opportunity Cost of REDD+: A Training Manual; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
[3]
Pagiola, S.; Arcenas, A.; Platais, G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Dev. 2005, 33, 237–253, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011.
[4]
UNFCCC REDD+ Web Platform. Available online: http://unfccc.int/methods_science/redd/items/4531.php (accessed on 2 February 2011).
[5]
Richards, M.; Asare, R.A.; Namirembe, S.; Olander, J.; Quinlan, M. The REDD Opportunities Scoping Exercise (ROSE): A Tool for Prioritizing Sub-national REDD+ Activities-Case Studies from Ghana, Tanzania, and Uganda; Forest Trends: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
[6]
Angelsen, A.; Brockhaus, M.; Kanninen, M.; Sills, E.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[7]
Springate-Baginski, O.; Wollenberg, E. Forest Governance and Rural Livelihoods: The Emerging Agenda; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2010.
[8]
Ebeling, J.; Yasue, M. Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation, and human development benefits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 1917–1924, doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0029.
[9]
Gregersen, H.; el Lakany, H.; Karsenty, A.; White, A. Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Indicate the Real Cost of REDD+?; Rights and Resources Initiative: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
[10]
B？rner, J.; Wunder, S. Paying for avoided deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: From cost assessment to scheme design. Int. For. Rev. 2008, 10, 496–511.
[11]
Karsenty, A. The architecture of proposed REDD schemes after Bali: Facing critical choices. Int. For. Rev. 2008, 10, 443–457.
[12]
Engel, S.; Palmer, C. Painting the Forest REDD? Prospects for Mitigating Climate Change through Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation; Institute for Environmental Decisions, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology: Zurich, Switzerland, 2008.
[13]
Geist, H.J.; Lambing, E.F. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 2001, 52, 143–150.
[14]
Daviet, F.; McMahon, H.; Bradley, R.; Stolle, F.; Nakhooda, S. REDD+ Flags: What We Need to Know about the Options; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
[15]
Wunder, S. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts; CIFOR: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2005.
[16]
Larson, A.M.; Barry, D.; Dahal, G.R.; Colfer, C.J.P. Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform; Earthscan Publications Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2010.
[17]
Larson, A.; Petkova, E. An introduction to forest governance, people and REDD+ in Latin America: Obstacles and opportunities. Forests 2011, 2, 86–111, doi:10.3390/f2010086.
[18]
Hayes, T.; Persha, L. Nesting local forestry initiatives: Revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12, 545–553, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.003.
[19]
Corbera, E.; Estrada, M.; May, P.; Navarro, G.; Pacheco, P. Rights to land, forests and carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica. Forests 2011, 2, 301–342, doi:10.3390/f2010301.
[20]
Cronkleton, P.; Bray, D.; Medina, G. Community forest management and the emergence of multi-scale governance institutions: Lessons for REDD+ development from Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia. Forests 2011, 2, 451–473, doi:10.3390/f2020451.
[21]
Binswanger, H.P. Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon. World Dev. 1991, 19, 821–829, doi:10.1016/0305-750X(91)90135-5.
[22]
Swallow, B.; van Noordwijk, M.; Dewi, S.; Murdiyarso, D.; White, D.; Gockowski, J.; Hyman, G.; Budidarsono, S.; Robiglio, V.; Meadu, V.; Ekadinata, A.; Agus, F.; Hairiah, K.; Mbile, P.; Sonwa, D.; Weise, D. Opportunities for Avoided Deforestation with Sustainable Benefits; ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins: Nairobi, Kenya, 2007.
[23]
Grieg-Gran, M. The Cost of Avoiding Deforestation; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2008.
[24]
Nepstad, D.; Soares-Filho, B.; Merry, F.; Moutinho, P.; Rodrigues, H.O.; Bowan, M.; Schwartzman, S.; Almeida, O.; Rivero, S. The costs and benefits of reducing carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. In Proceedings of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Parties, 13th Session, Bali, Indonesia, 3–14 December 2007; The Woods Hole Research Center: Falmouth, MA, USA, 2007.
[25]
Deveny, A.; Nackoney, J.; Purvis, N. Forest Carbon Index: The Geography of Forests in Climate Solutions; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
[26]
Boucher, D. What REDD+ Can Do: The Economics and Development of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation; Union of Concerned Scientists: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
[27]
Kindermann, G.; Obersteiner, M.; Sohngen, B.; Sathaye, J.; Andrasko, K.; Rametsteiner, E.; Schlamadinger, B.; Wunder, S.; Beach, R. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10302–10307, doi:10.1073/pnas.0710616105. 18650377
[28]
Pagiola, S.; Bosquet, B. Estimating the Cost of REDD+ at the Country Level; Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
[29]
Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[30]
Pagiola, S.; Agostini, P.; Gobbi, J.; de Haan, C.; Ibrahim, M.; Murgueitio, E.; Ramírez, E.; Rosales, M.; Ruíz, J.P. Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services in Agricultural Landscapes; The World Bank Environment Department: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[31]
Sheil, D.; Wunder, S. The value of tropical forest to local communities: Complications, caveats, and cautions. Conserv. Ecol. 2002, 6, 9:1–9:16.
[32]
Pfaff, A.; Kerr, S.; Lipper, L.; Cavatassi, R.; Davis, B.; Hendy, J.; Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A. Will Buying Tropical Forest Carbon Benefit the Poor? Evidence from Costa Rica; Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2004.
[33]
Wunder, S.; Alban, M. Payments for environmental services in developing and developed countries. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 685–698, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.004.
[34]
Hayes, T.M. A Challenge for environmental governance: Institutional change in a traditional common-property forest system. Policy Sci. 2010, 43, 27–48, doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9083-5.
[35]
Miller, K.; Chang, E.; Johnson, N. Defining Common Ground for the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
[36]
Dodds, D. The Ecological and Social Sustainability of Miskito Subsistence in the Rio Plátano Biosphere Reserve, Honduras: The Cultural Ecology of Swidden Horticulturalists in a Protected Area; University of California: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1994.
[37]
International Union for Conservation of Nature. The Conservation State of the Rio Plátano Biosphere Reserve, Honduras; Technical Report for the UNESCO World Heritage Bureau: Paris, France, 1995.
[38]
Sanchez, A.; Amaya, Y. Evaluación de la Cobertura de la Tierra en la Reserva del Hombre y la Biosfera del Río Plátano, Mediante un Monitoreo Multi-temporal Utilizando Imágenes del Satélite Landsat-TM Entre Los A？os 1995–96 y 1997–99; Technical Report for Programa Social Forestal PSF/GTZ/PBRP: Tegucigalpa, Honduras, 2000.
[39]
Wade, M. Evaluation of Deforestation in the Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve, HondurasMS Thesis, Oregon State University: Corvallis, OR, USA, 2007.
[40]
Henry, G. Practical Sampling; SAGE Publications Inc.: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1990.
[41]
Creswell, J. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches; Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009.
[42]
McLaughlin, W.J.; Nielsen, E.A. A participatory approach to social impact assessment: The interactive community forum. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2003, 23, 367–382, doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00098-7.
[43]
Sohngen, B. An Analysis of Forestry Carbon Sequestration as a Response to Climate Change; Copenhagen Consensus Center: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2009.
[44]
B？rner, J.; Wunder, S.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.; Tito, M.R.; Pereira, L.; Nascimento, N. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1272–1282, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.003.
[45]
Stocks, A.; McMahan, B.; Taber, P. Indigenous, colonist, and government impacts on Nicaragua’s Bosawas reserve. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21, 1495–1505. 18173473
[46]
Landell-Mills, N.; Porras, I.T. Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold: A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2002.
[47]
Van Dam, C. Indigenous territories and REDD in Latin America: Opportunity or threat? Forests 2011, 2, 394–414, doi:10.3390/f2010394.
[48]
Agrawal, A.; Nepstad, D.; Chhatre, A. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2011, 36, 373–396, doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-042009-094508.
[49]
Search Decisions of the COP and the CMP; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: Bonn, Germany, 2011.
