A Comparison of Invasive Acer platanoides and Native A. saccharum First-Year Seedlings: Growth, Biomass Distribution and the Influence of Ecological Factors in a Forest Understory
Invasive shade tolerant species can have profound and long-lasting detrimental effects even on previously undisturbed forests. In North American forests, the invasive Acer platanoides is capable of dominating the understory where it could displace the native Acer saccharum. To understand the relative importance of various ecological factors in a forest understory on their establishment, we transplanted A. platanoides and A. saccharum seedlings in an urban sugar maple forest understory and their growth and survival were compared over a growing season. Seedlings did not differ in height, but biomass growth and assimilation rates were twice as high for the invasive species. Ecological variables accounted for only 23–24% of variation in growth. Seedlings of A. platanoides appeared to capture light more efficiently, with over 150% greater foliage biomass and surface area. A. saccharum seedlings were more negatively affected by herbivory. The more robust A. platanoides seedlings presented characteristics that could allow them to better grow and survive in shaded understories than their native congeners.
References
[1]
Vitousek, P.M.; D’Antonio, C.M.; Loope, L.L.; Westbrooks, R. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 1996, 84, 468–478.
[2]
Mack, R.N.; Simberloff, D.; Lonsdale, W.M.; Evans, H.; Clout, M.; Bazzaz, F.A. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Eco. Appl. 2000, 10, 689–710, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2.
[3]
Reichard, S.H.; Hamilton, C.W. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Bio. 1997, 11, 193–203, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95473.x.
[4]
Martin, P.H.; Canham, C.D.; Marks, P.L. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: Intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 142–149.
[5]
Canham, C.D. Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Acer saccharum. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1985, 112, 134–145, doi:10.2307/2996410.
[6]
Wangen, S.R.; Webster, C.R. Potential for multiple lag phases during biotic invasions: Reconstructing an invasion of the exotic tree Acer platanoides. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 258–268, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01138.x.
[7]
Webster, C.R.; Jenkins, M.A.; Jose, S. Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the eastern United States. J. For. 2006, 104, 366–374.
[8]
Herron, P.M.; Martine, C.T.; Latimer, A.M.; Leicht-Young, S.A. Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: Prediction and explanation of woody plant invasion in New England. Divers. Distrib. 2007, 13, 633–644, doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00381.x.
[9]
Santamour, F.S.; McArdle, A.J. Checklist of cultivated maples. III. Acer platanoides L. J. Arboric. 1982, 8, 241–246.
[10]
Nowak, D.J.; Rowntree, R.A. History and range of Norway maple. J. Arboric. 1990, 16, 291–296.
[11]
Anderson, R. Disturbance as a factor in the distribution of sugar maple and the invasion of Norway maple into a modified woodland. Rhodora 1999, 101, 264–273.
[12]
Webb, S.L.; Pendergast, T.H.; Dwyer, M.E. Response of native and exotic maple seedling banks to removal of the exotic, invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 2001, 128, 141–149, doi:10.2307/3088736.
[13]
Bertin, R.I.; Manner, M.E.; Larrow, B.F.; Cantwell, T.W.; Berstene, E.M. Norway maple (Acer platanoides) and other non-native trees in urban woodlands of central Massachusetts. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 2005, 132, 225–235, doi:10.3159/1095-5674(2005)132[225:NMAPAO]2.0.CO;2.
[14]
Webster, C.R.; Nelson, K.; Wangen, S.R. Stand dynamics of an insular population of an invasive tree, Acer platanoides. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 208, 85–99, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.017.
[15]
Wangen, S.R.; Webster, C.R.; Griggs, J.A. Spatial characteristics of the invasion of Acer platanoides on a temperate forested island. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8, 1001–1012, doi:10.1007/s10530-005-2060-9.
[16]
Midy, J.; Brisson, J.; Boivin, P. Invasion du Parc du Mont-Royal par l'érable de Norvège: Evaluation de la Situation, Causes, Conséquences. Rapport d'Activités Final Présenté à la Direction des Sports, des Parcs et des Espaces Verts, Ville de Montréal; Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2007.
[17]
Webb, S.L.; Dwyer, M.; Kaunzinger, C.K.; Wyckoff, P.H. The myth of the resilient forest: Case study of the invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). Rhodora 2000, 102, 332–354.
[18]
Fang, W. Spatial analysis of an invasion front of Acer platanoides: dynamic inferences from static data. Ecography 2005, 28, 283–294, doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04052.x.
[19]
Martin, P.H.; Marks, P.L. Intact forests provide only weak resistance to a shade-tolerant invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides L). J. Ecol. 2006, 94, 1070–1079, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01159.x.
[20]
Martin, P.H.; Canham, C.D. Dispersal and recruitment limitation in native versus exotic tree species: Life-history strategies and Janzen-Connell effects. Oikos 2010, 119, 807–824, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17941.x.
[21]
Martin, P.H.; Canham, C.D.; Kobe, R.K. Divergence from the growth–survival trade-off and extreme high growth rates drive patterns of exotic tree invasions in closed-canopy forests. J. Ecol. 2010, 98, 778–789, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01666.x.
[22]
Wyckoff, P.H.; Webb, S.L. Understory influence of the invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1996, 123, 197–205, doi:10.2307/2996795.
[23]
Martin, P.H. Norway maple (Acer platanoides) invasion of a natural forest stand: Understory consequence and regeneration pattern. Biol. Invasions 1999, 1, 215–222, doi:10.1023/A:1010084421858.
Webb, S.L.; Kaunzinger, C.K. Biological invasion of the Drew University (New Jersey) forest preserve by Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1993, 120, 343–349, doi:10.2307/2996999.
[26]
Godman, R.M.; Yawney, H.W.; Tubbs, C.H. Sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh). In Sylvics of North America; Burns, R.M., Honkala, B.H., Eds.; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; Volume 2, pp. 78–91.
[27]
Marks, P.L.; Gardescu, S. A case study of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) as a forest seedling bank species. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 1998, 125, 287–296, doi:10.2307/2997242.
[28]
Pacala, S.W.; Canham, C.D.; Saponara, J.; Silander, J.A., Jr.; Kobe, R.K.; Ribbens, E. Forest models defined by field measurements: Estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 1996, 66, 1–43, doi:10.2307/2963479.
[29]
Morrison, J.A.; Mauck, K. Experimental field comparison of native and non-native maple seedlings: Natural enemies, ecophysiology, growth and survival. J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 1036–1049, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01270.x.
[30]
Mack, R.N. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biol. Conserv. 1996, 78, 107–121, doi:10.1016/0006-3207(96)00021-3.
[31]
Thiffault, C. état de situation sur les bois de l’arrondissement historique et naturel du mont Royal; Direction régionale de Montréal, Ministère de l’Environnement du Québec: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2003.
[32]
Boivin, R. La végétation forestière du Mont-Royal (Montréal, Québec); Département de sciences biologiques; Université de Montréal: Montreal, QC, Canada, 1989.
[33]
Brisson, J.; Bouchard, A. érablière à caryer. In Manuel de Foresterie; MultiMondes: Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada, 2009; pp. 206–215.
[34]
Adams, J.M.; Fang, W.; Callaway, R.M.; Cipollini, D.; Newell, E. A cross-continental test of the Enemy Release Hypothesis: Leaf herbivory on Acer platanoides (L.) is three times lower in North America than in its native Europe. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 1005–1016, doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9312-4.
[35]
Lapointe, M.; Brisson, J. Tar spot disease on Norway maple in North America: Quantifying the impacts of a reunion between an invasive tree species and its adventive natural enemy. Ecoscience 2011, 18, 63–69, doi:10.2980/18-1-3378.
[36]
Paquette, A.; Bouchard, A.; Cogliastro, A. A less restrictive technique for the estimation of understory light under variable weather conditions. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 242, 800–804, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.067.
[37]
JMP Statistical Discovery Software, version 7.0.1, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA, 2007.
[38]
Legendre, P.; Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.
[39]
Ter Braak, C.J.F.; ？milauer, P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination, version 4.5; Microcomputer Power: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2002.
[40]
Meiners, S.J. Seed and seedling ecology of Acer saccharum and Acer platanoides: A contrast between native and exotic congeners. Northeast. Naturalist 2005, 12, 23–32, doi:10.1656/1092-6194(2005)012[0023:SASEOA]2.0.CO;2.
[41]
Kloeppel, B.D.; Abrams, M.D. Ecophysiological attributes of the native Acer saccharum and the exotic Acer platanoides in urban oak forests in Pennsylvania, USA. Tree Physiol. 1995, 15, 739–746, doi:10.1093/treephys/15.11.739. 14965992
[42]
Paquette, A.; Fontaine, B.; Berninger, F.; Dubois, K.; Lechowicz, M.J.; Messier, C.; Posada, J.M.; Valladares, F.; Brisson, J. Seedlings of the exotic norway maple have greater plasticity and late season height growth than native sugar maple in canopy gaps. 2012. submitted.
[43]
Sanford, N.L.; Harrington, R.A.; Fownes, J.H. Survival and growth of native and alien woody seedlings in open and understory environments. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 183, 377–385, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00141-5.
[44]
Walters, M.B.; Reich, P.B. Seed size, nitrogen supply, and growth rate affect tree seedling survival in deep shade. Ecology 2000, 81, 1887–1901, doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1887:SSNSAG]2.0.CO;2.
[45]
Walters, M.B.; Reich, P.B. Are shade tolerance, survival, and growth linked? Low light and, nitrogen effects on hardwood seedlings. Ecology 1996, 77, 841–853, doi:10.2307/2265505.
[46]
Gómez-Aparicio, L.; Canham, C.D.; Martin, P.H. Neighbourhood models of the effects of the invasive Acer platanoides on tree seedling dynamics: Linking impacts on communities and ecosystems. J. Ecol. 2008, 96, 78–90.
[47]
Gómez-Aparicio, L.; Canham, C.D. Neighborhood models of the effects of invasive tree species on ecosystem processes. Ecol. Monogr. 2008, 78, 69–86, doi:10.1890/06-2036.1.
[48]
Reinhart, K.O.; Greene, E.; Callaway, R.M. Effects of Acer platanoides invasion on understory plant communities and tree regeneration in the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecography 2005, 28, 573–582, doi:10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04166.x.
Lapointe, M. Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. Presence of crown damage by the tar spot disease on A. platanoides, one year after the study took place. 2008. Personal observation.
[51]
Cincotta, C.L.; Adams, J.M.; Holzapfel, C. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: A comparison of foliar insect herbivory of the exotic Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and the native sugar maple (A. saccharum L.). Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 379–388, doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9255-9.
[52]
Boege, K.; Marquis, R.J. Facing herbivory as you grow up: The ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trend Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20, 441–448, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.001.
[53]
Reinhart, K.O.; Callaway, R.M. Soil biota facilitate exotic Acer invasions in Europe and North America. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14, 1737–1745, doi:10.1890/03-5204.
[54]
Richardson, D.M.; Allsopp, N.; D’Antonio, C.M.; Milton, S.J.; Rejmanek, M. Plant invasions—The role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 2000, 75, 65–93, doi:10.1017/S0006323199005435.
