Mechanical site preparation is frequently proposed to alleviate problematic soil conditions when afforesting retired agricultural fields. Without management of soil problems, any seedlings planted in these areas may exhibit poor growth and survival. While mechanical site preparation methods currently employed in hardwood afforestation are proven, there is a substantial void in research comparing subsoiling, bedding, and combination plowing treatments. A total of 4,320 bare-root Nuttall oak ( Quercus texana Buckley), Shumard oak ( Quercus shumardii Buckley), and swamp chestnut oak ( Quercus michauxii Nutt.) seedlings were planted in February 2008 on three Mississippi sites. All sites were of comparable soils and received above average precipitation throughout the three-year duration of the study. Four site preparation treatments were replicated at each site, with 480 seedlings planted in each of nine replications, and a total of 1,440 seedlings per species planted across all sites. Mechanical treatments were installed using 3.1 m row centers, with treatments as follows: control, subsoiling, bedding, and combination plowing. Treatment effects on seedling height, groundline diameter (GLD), and survival were analyzed. Seedlings exhibited greater height in bedded and combination plowed areas (79.7 cm to 102.7 cm and 82.6 cm to 100.1 cm, respectively) compared to subsoiled or control areas (70.4 cm to 84.6 cm and 71.4 cm to 86.9 cm, respectively). Greater GLD was observed in bedded and combination plowed areas (11.9 mm to 18.4 mm and 12.2 mm to 18.3 mm, respectively) compared to subsoiled or control areas (10.2 mm to 14.6 mm and 10.5 mm to 15.6 mm, respectively). Survival was high for this study (94.%), and no differences were detected among treatments.
References
[1]
Dean, T.J.; McCoy, J.; Keeland, B.; Lockhart, B.R. Comparing regeneration techniques for afforesting previously farmed bottomland hardwood sites in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. Forestry 2003, 76, 169–180, doi:10.1093/forestry/76.2.169.
[2]
Keeland, B.D.; King, S.L. Evaluation of reforestation in the lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. Restor. Ecol. 1999, 7, 348–359, doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72029.x.
[3]
Ezell, A.W.; Schweitzer, C.J.; Gardiner, E.S.; Conner, W.H.; Stanturf, J.A. Recognizing and overcoming difficult site conditions for afforestation of bottomland hardwoods. Ecol. Restor. 2004, 22, 183–193, doi:10.3368/er.22.3.183.
[4]
Greis, J.P.; Wear, D.N. Southern Forest Resource Assessment General Technical Report SRS-53; US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; pp. 348–359.
[5]
Shankle, M.W.; Ezell, A.W. Effects of subsoiling and competition control on first year survival and growth of four hardwood species. In Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference Biloxi, MS, USA, 24–28 March 2003; Connor, K.F., Ed.; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 571–573.
[6]
Kennedy, H.E., Jr.; Clewell, A.F.; Stanturf, J.A.; Keeland, B.D.; Allen, J.A. A Guide to Bottomland Hardwood Restoration; General Technical Report SRS-40; US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
[7]
Roberts, W. Conservation Practice 324 Deep Tillage (Afforestation—Cropland ; Area 1 Conservation Technical Newsletter; US Department of Agriculture,Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[8]
Warren. M.E., Jr.; Leninger, T.D.; Devall, M.S.; Hamel, P.B.; Gardiner, E.S.; Stanturf, J.A. Restoring bottomland hardwood ecosystems in the lower Mississippi alluvial valley. J. For. 2000, 98, 10–16.
[9]
Lowery, R.F.; Morris, L.A. Influence of site preparation on soil conditions affecting seedling establishment and early growth. South. J. Appl. For. 1988, 12, 170–178.
[10]
Godwin, K.D.; Londo, A.J.; Hodges, J.D.; Ezell, A.W.; Moree, J.L. Evaluating the use of enhanced oak seedlings for increased survival and growth: First-year survival. In. In Proceedings of the 14th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research ConferenceAthens, GA, USA, 26 February–1 March 2007; Stanturf, J., Ed.; General Technical Report SRS-121; US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Washington,DC,USA,2010;; pp. 165–169.
[11]
Pope, P.E.; Kaczmarek, D.J.; Rathfon, R.A. Site preparation for red oak plantation establishment on old field sites in Southern Indiana. In. In Proceedings of the Tenth Central Hardwood Forest ConferenceMorgantown, WV, USA, 5–8 March 1995; Fosbroke, S.L.C., Gottschalk, K.W., Eds.; General Technical Report NE-197; US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Washington,DC,USA,1995;; pp. 349–362.
[12]
Gold, M.A.; Wallendorf, M.; van Sambeek, J.W.; Dey, D.C.; Kabrick, J.M. Soil properties and growth of swamp white oak and pin oak on bedded soils in the lower Missouri River floodplain. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 204, 315–327, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.014.
[13]
Williams, T.M. Site preparation on forested wetlands of the Southeastern Coastal Plain. In. In Proceedings of the Symposium: The forested wetlands of the southern United StatesOrlando, FL, USA, 12–14 July 1988; Lea, R., Hook, D.D., Eds.; General Technical Report SE-50; US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Washington,DC,USA,1988;; pp. 67–71.
[14]
Preston, D.P.; Miwa, M.; Patterson, S.C.; Aust, W.M.; Burger, J.A.; Xu, Y. Changes in surface water table depth and soil physical properties after harvest and establishment of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in Atlantic coastal plains wetlands of South Carolina. Soil Tillage Res. 2002, 63, 109–121, doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00226-4.
[15]
Hodges, J.D. Development and ecology of bottomland hardwood sites. For. Ecol. Manag. 1997, 90, 117–125, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03906-0.
[16]
Adams, J.C.; Patterson, W.B. 16. Patterson, W.B.; Adams, J.C. Soil, hydroperiod and bedding effects on restoring bottomland hardwoods on flood-prone agricultural lands in north Louisiana, USA. Forestry 2003, 76, 181–188, doi:10.1093/forestry/76.2.181.
[17]
Fischer, B.C.; Pope, P.E.; Seifert, J.R. The effects of three levels of site preparation on planted swamp chestnut oak on a poorly drained site. In. In Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research ConferenceAtlanta, GA, USA, 7–8 November 1984; Shoulders, E., Ed.; General Technical Report SO-54; US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Washington,DC,USA,1984;; pp. 53–56.
[18]
Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Desoto County Mississippi; US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1953; pp. 109–121.
[19]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center. pp. 109–121. Available online: www.ncdc.noaa.gov , accessed on 28 February 2011.
[20]
Soil Conservation Service. Soil survey of Copiah County Mississippi; US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1984; pp. 109–121.
[21]
Soil Conservation Service. Soil survey of Grenada County Mississippi; US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1967; pp. 109–121.
[22]
Ezell, A.W., Jr.; Hodges, J.D., Jr.; Russell, D.R., Jr. An evaluation of hardwood reforestation methods on previously farmed lands in Central Alabama. In. In Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research ConferenceClemson, SC, USA, 25–27 February 1997; Waldrop, T.A., Ed.; General Technical Report SRS-20; US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Washington,DC,USA,1997;; pp. 272–276.
[23]
Honkala, B.H.; Burns, R.M. Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1990.
[24]
Dubois, M.R.; Smidt, M.F.; Folegatti, B.S. Costs and cost trends for forestry practices in the South. For. Landowner 2007, 66, 11–16.
