Generalized least squares (GLS) for model parameter estimation has a long and successful history dating to its development by Gauss in 1795. Alternatives can outperform GLS in some settings, and alternatives to GLS are sometimes sought when GLS exhibits curious behavior, such as in Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle (PPP). PPP was described in 1987 in the context of estimating fundamental parameters that arise in nuclear interaction experiments. In PPP, GLS estimates fell outside the range of the data, eliciting concerns that GLS was somehow flawed. These concerns have led to suggested alternatives to GLS estimators. This paper defends GLS in the PPP context, investigates when PPP can occur, illustrates when PPP can be beneficial for parameter estimation, reviews optimality properties of GLS estimators, and gives an example in which PPP does occur.
References
[1]
Peelle, R. Peelle's Pertinent Puzzle; Oak Ridge National Laboratory Memorandum: Washington DC, USA, 1987.
[2]
Nichols, A.L. International Evaluation of Neutron Cross Section Standards; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2007.
[3]
Chiba, S.; Smith, D. A Suggested Procedure for Resolving an Anomaly in Least-Squares Data Analysis Known as Peelle's Pertinent Puzzle and the General Implications for Nuclear Data Evaluation. Report ANL/NDM-121; Argonne National Laboratory: Argonne, IL, USA, 1991.
[4]
Zhao, Z.; Perey, R. The Covariance Matrix of Derived Quantities and Their Combination. Report ORNL/TM-12106; Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 1992.
[5]
Hanson, K.; Kawano, T.; Talou, P. Probabilistic Interpretation of Peelle's Pertinent Puzzle. Proceeding of International Conference of Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, 26 September–1 October 2004; Haight, R.C., Chadwick, M.B., Kawano, T., Talou, P., Eds.; AIP Conference Proceedings: Melville, NY, USA, 2005.
[6]
Burr, T.; Kawano, T.; Talou, P.; Hengartner, N.; Pan, P. Alternatives to the Least Squares Solution to Peelle's Pertinent Puzzlesubmitted for publication. ？2010.
[7]
Christensen, R. Plane Answers to Complex Questions, The Theory of Linear Models; Springer: New York, 1999; pp. 23–25.
[8]
Burr, T.; Frey, H. Biased Regression: The Case for Cautious Application. Techometrics？2005, 47, 284–296.
[9]
Sivia, D. Data Analysis—A Dialogue With The Data. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology VII; Ciarlini, P., Filipe, E., Forbes, A.B., Pavese, F., Perruchet, C., Siebert, B.R.L., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing Company: Lisbon, Portugal, 2006; pp. 108–118.
[10]
Jones, C.; Finn, J.; Hengartner, N. Regression with Strongly Correlated Data. J. Multivariate Anal.？2008, 99, 2136–2153.
[11]
Finn, J.; Jones, C.; Hengartner, N. Strong Nonlinear Correlations, Conditional Entropy, and Perfect Estimation. In Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, Proceeding of 27th International Workshop Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA, 2007; AIP Conference Proceedings: Melville, NY, USA, 2007; p. 954.
