全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2011 

Fish Geometry and Electric Organ Discharge Determine Functional Organization of the Electrosensory Epithelium

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027470

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Active electroreception in Gymnotus omarorum is a sensory modality that perceives the changes that nearby objects cause in a self generated electric field. The field is emitted as repetitive stereotyped pulses that stimulate skin electroreceptors. Differently from mormyriformes electric fish, gymnotiformes have an electric organ distributed along a large portion of the body, which fires sequentially. As a consequence shape and amplitude of both, the electric field generated and the image of objects, change during the electric pulse. To study how G. omarorum constructs a perceptual representation, we developed a computational model that allows the determination of the self-generated field and the electric image. We verify and use the model as a tool to explore image formation in diverse experimental circumstances. We show how the electric images of objects change in shape as a function of time and position, relative to the fish's body. We propose a theoretical framework about the organization of the different perceptive tasks made by electroreception: 1) At the head region, where the electrosensory mosaic presents an electric fovea, the field polarizing nearby objects is coherent and collimated. This favors the high resolution sampling of images of small objects and perception of electric color. Besides, the high sensitivity of the fovea allows the detection and tracking of large faraway objects in rostral regions. 2) In the trunk and tail region a multiplicity of sources illuminate different regions of the object, allowing the characterization of the shape and position of a large object. In this region, electroreceptors are of a unique type and capacitive detection should be based in the pattern of the afferents response. 3) Far from the fish, active electroreception is not possible but the collimated field is suitable to be used for electrocommunication and detection of large objects at the sides and caudally.

References

[1]  Lissmann HW, Machin KE (1958) The mechanisms of object location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and similar fish. J Exp Biol 35: 457–486.
[2]  von der Emde G, Schwarz S, Gomez L, Budelli R, Grant K (1998) Electric fish measure distance in the dark. Nature 395: 890–894.
[3]  von der Emde G, Fetz S (2007) Distance, shape and more: recognition of object features during active electrolocation in a weakly electric fish. J Exp Biol 210: 3082–3095.
[4]  von der Emde G (2004) Distance and shape: perception of the 3-dimensional world by weakly electric fish. J Physiol Paris 98: 67–80.
[5]  Budelli R, Caputi A, Gomez L, Rother D, Grant K (2002) The electric image in Gnathonemus petersii. J Physiol Paris 96: 421–429.
[6]  Caputi AA, Budelli R (2006) Peripheral electrosensory imaging by weakly electric fish. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192: 587–600.
[7]  Caputi AA, Castello ME, Aguilera PA, Pereira C, Nogueira J, et al. (2008) Active electroreception in Gymnotus omari: imaging, object discrimination, and early processing of actively generated signals. J Physiol Paris 102: 256–271.
[8]  Rother D, Migliaro A, Canetti R, Gomez L, Caputi A, et al. (2003) Electric images of two low resistance objects in weakly electric fish. Biosystems 71: 169–177.
[9]  Migliaro A, Caputi AA, Budelli R (2005) Theoretical analysis of pre-receptor image conditioning in weakly electric fish. PLoS Comput Biol 1: 123–131.
[10]  Pereira AC, Caputi AAImaging in electrosensory systems. Interdiscip Sci 2: 291–307.
[11]  Caputi A, Trujillo-Cenoz O (1994) The spinal cord of Gymnotus carapo: the electromotoneurons and their projection patterns. Brain Behav Evol 44: 166–174.
[12]  Rasnow B, Assad C, Bower JM (1993) Phase and amplitude maps of the electric organ discharge of the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J Comp Physiol [A] 172: 481–491.
[13]  Rasnow B, Bower JM (1996) The electric organ discharges of the Gymnotiform fishes: I. Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J Comp Physiol A 178: 383–396.
[14]  Heiligenberg W (1973) Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish Eigenmannia rhamphichthyidae Gymnotoidei. J Comp Physiol 87: 164137.
[15]  Caputi A, Budelli R (1995) The electric image in weakly electric fish: I. A data-based model of waveform generation in Gymnotus carapo. J Comput Neurosci 2: 131–147.
[16]  Caputi A, Budelli R, Grant K, Bell C (1998) The electric image in weakly electric fish: II. Physical images of resistive objects in Gnathonemus petersii. J Exp Biol 201: 2115–2128.
[17]  Babineau D, Longtin A, Lewis JE (2006) Modeling the electric field of weakly electric fish. J Exp Biol 209: 3636–3651.
[18]  Babineau D, Lewis JE, Longtin A (2007) Spatial acuity and prey detection in weakly electric fish. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e38.
[19]  Assad C (1997) Electric field maps and boundary element simulations of electrolocation in weakly electric fish. Pasadena, California: California Institute of Technology.
[20]  Rasnow B (1996) The effects of simple objects on the electric field of Apteronotus Leptorhynchus. J Comp Physiol A 178: 397–411.
[21]  Budelli R, Caputi AA (2000) The electric image in weakly electric fish: perception of objects of complex impedance. J Exp Biol 203 Pt 3: 481–492.
[22]  Caputi AA, Silva AC, Macadar O (1993) Electric organ discharge in Gymnotus carapo: spinal origin and peripheral mechanisms. J Comp Physiol 173: 227–232.
[23]  Rodriguez-Cattaneo A, Caputi AA (2009) Waveform diversity of electric organ discharges: the role of electric organ auto-excitability in Gymnotus spp. J Exp Biol 212: 3478–3489.
[24]  Einthoven W (1912) “The different forms of the human electrocardiogram and their signification”. Lancet 1: 853–861.
[25]  von der Emde G (1990) Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. J Comp Physiol A 167: 413–421.
[26]  Castello ME, Aguilera PA, Trujillo-Cenoz O, Caputi AA (2000) Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: pre-receptor processing and the distribution of electroreceptor types. J Exp Biol 203(Pt 21): 3279–3287.
[27]  Aguilera PA, Caputi AA (2003) Electroreception in G carapo: detection of changes in waveform of the electrosensory signals. J Exp Biol 206: 989–998.
[28]  Watson D, Bastian J (1979) Frequency response characteristics of electroreceptors in the weakly electric fish, Gymnotus carapo. J Comp Physiol 134: 191–202.
[29]  Hopkins CD (1995) Convergent designs for electrogenesis and electroreception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5: 769–777.
[30]  von der Emde G, Schwarz S (2002) Imaging of objects through active electrolocation in Gnathonemus petersii. J Physiol Paris 96: 431–444.
[31]  Castello ME, Aguilera PA, Trujillo-Cenoz O, Caputi AA (2000) Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: pre-receptor processing and the distribution of electroreceptor types. J Exp Biol 203: 3279–3287.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133