The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) is an important model organism for the study of social behavior, yet our ability to correlate genes and behavior in this species has been limited due to a lack of genetic and genomic resources. Here we report the BAC-based targeted sequencing of behaviorally-relevant genes and flanking regions in the prairie vole. A total of 6.4 Mb of non-redundant or haplotype-specific sequence assemblies were generated that span the partial or complete sequence of 21 behaviorally-relevant genes as well as an additional 55 flanking genes. Estimates of nucleotide diversity from 13 loci based on alignments of 1.7 Mb of haplotype-specific assemblies revealed an average pair-wise heterozygosity (8.4×10？3). Comparative analyses of the prairie vole proteins encoded by the behaviorally-relevant genes identified >100 substitutions specific to the prairie vole lineage. Finally, our sequencing data indicate that a duplication of the prairie vole AVPR1A locus likely originated from a recent segmental duplication spanning a minimum of 105 kb. In summary, the results of our study provide the genomic resources necessary for the molecular and genetic characterization of a high-priority set of candidate genes for regulating social behavior in the prairie vole.
References
[1]
McGraw LA, Young LJ (2010) The prairie vole: an emerging model organism for understanding the social brain. Trends Neurosci 33: 103–109.
[2]
Young KA, Gobrogge KL, Liu Y, Wang Z (2011) The neurobiology of pair bonding: Insights from a socially monogamous rodent. Front Neuroendocrinol 32: 53–69.
[3]
Carter CS, DeVries AC, Getz LL (1995) Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: the prairie vole model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 19: 303–314.
[4]
Young LJ, Wang Z (2004) The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat Neurosci 7: 1048–1054.
[5]
Donaldson ZR, Young LJ (2008) Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science 322: 900–904.
[6]
Young LJ, Nilsen R, Waymire KG, MacGregor GR, Insel TR (1999) Increased affiliative response to vasopressin in mice expressing the V1a receptor from a monogamous vole. Nature 400: 766–768.
[7]
Young LJ, Huot B, Nilsen R, Wang Z, Insel TR (1996) Species differences in central oxytocin receptor gene expression: comparative analysis of promoter sequences. J Neuroendocrinol 8: 777–783.
[8]
Kramer KM, Carr MS, Schmidt JV, Cushing BS (2006) Parental regulation of central patterns of estrogen receptor alpha. Neuroscience 142: 165–173.
[9]
Aragona BJ, Liu Y, Yu YJ, Curtis JT, Detwiler JM, et al. (2006) Nucleus accumbens dopamine differentially mediates the formation and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds. Nature Neuroscience 9: 133–139.
[10]
Aragona B, Wang Z (2009) Dopamine regulation of social choice in a monogamous rodent. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 3:
[11]
Lim M, Liu Y, Ryabinin A, Bai Y, Wang Z, et al. (2007) CRF receptors in the nucleus accumbens modulate partner preference in prairie voles. Hormones and Behavior 51: 508–515.
[12]
Bosch OJ, Nair HP, Ahern TH, Neumann ID, Young LJ (2009) The CRF system mediates increased passive stress-coping behavior following the loss of a bonded partner in a monogamous rodent. Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 1406–1415.
[13]
Lei K, Cushing BS, Musatov S, Ogawa S, Kramer KM (2011) Estrogen receptor-alpha in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis regulates social affiliation in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). PLoS One 5: e8931.
[14]
Cushing BS, Razzoli M, Murphy AZ, Epperson PM, Le WW, et al. (2004) Intraspecific variation in estrogen receptor alpha and the expression of male sociosexual behavior in two populations of prairie voles. Brain Res 1016: 247–254.
[15]
Cushing BS, Perry A, Musatov S, Ogawa S, Papademetriou E (2008) Estrogen receptors in the medial amygdala inhibit the expression of male prosocial behavior. J Neurosci 28: 10399–10403.
[16]
Liu Y, Curtis JT, Wang Z (2001) Vasopressin in the lateral septum regulates pair bond formation in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behav Neurosci 115: 910–919.
[17]
Berton O, McClung CA, Dileone RJ, Krishnan V, Renthal W, et al. (2006) Essential role of BDNF in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway in social defeat stress. Science 311: 864–868.
[18]
McGraw LA, Davis JK, Lowman JJ, ten Hallers BF, Koriabine M, et al. (2010) Development of genomic resources for the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster): construction of a BAC library and vole-mouse comparative cytogenetic map. BMC Genomics 11: 70.
[19]
Thomas JW, Prasad AB, Summers TJ, Lee-Lin SQ, Maduro VV, et al. (2002) Parallel construction of orthologous sequence-ready clone contig maps in multiple species. Genome Res 12: 1277–1285.
[20]
Davis J, Lowman J, Thomas P, te Hallers B, Koriabine M, et al. (2010) Evolution of a bitter taste receptor gene cluster in a New World sparrow. Genome Biology and Evolution 2: 358–370.
[21]
Blakesley RW, Hansen NF, Mullikin JC, Thomas PJ, McDowell JC, et al. (2004) An intermediate grade of finished genomic sequence suitable for comparative analyses. Genome Res 14: 2235–2244.
[22]
Wheelan SJ, Church DM, Ostell JM (2001) Spidey: a tool for mRNA-to-genomic alignments. Genome Res 11: 1952–1957.
[23]
Schwartz S, Kent WJ, Smit A, Zhang Z, Baertsch R, et al. (2003) Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ. Genome Res 13: 103–107.
[24]
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882.
[25]
Yang Z (1997) PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci 13: 555–556.
[26]
Zhang J (2000) Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 50: 56–68.
[27]
Levy S, Sutton G, Ng PC, Feuk L, Halpern AL, et al. (2007) The diploid genome sequence of an individual human. PLoS Biol 5: e254.
[28]
Pool JE, Hellmann I, Jensen JD, Nielsen R (2010) Population genetic inference from genomic sequence variation. Genome Res 20: 291–300.
[29]
Baines JF, Harr B (2007) Reduced X-linked diversity in derived populations of house mice. Genetics 175: 1911–1921.
[30]
Storz JF, Kelly JK (2008) Effects of spatially varying selection on nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium: insights from deer mouse globin genes. Genetics 180: 367–379.
[31]
Hellborg L, Ellegren H (2004) Low levels of nucleotide diversity in mammalian Y chromosomes. Mol Biol Evol 21: 158–163.
[32]
Li R, Fan W, Tian G, Zhu H, He L, et al. (2010) The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 463: 311–317.
[33]
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437: 69–87.
[34]
Kim JI, Ju YS, Park H, Kim S, Lee S, et al. (2009) A highly annotated whole-genome sequence of a Korean individual. Nature 460: 1011–1015.
[35]
Ng PC, Henikoff S (2003) SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3812–3814.
[36]
Hammock EA, Young LJ (2005) Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits. Science 308: 1630–1634.
[37]
Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120.
[38]
Lynch M, Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151–1155.
[39]
Steppan S, Adkins R, Anderson J (2004) Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes. Syst Biol 53: 533–553.
[40]
Murphy WJ, Pringle TH, Crider TA, Springer MS, Miller W (2007) Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny. Genome Res 17: 413–421.
