| [1] | Gavaze E, Lapébie P, Ereskovsky AV, Vacelet J, Renard E, et al. (2011) No longer Demospongiae: Homoscleromorpha formal nomination as a fourth class of Porifera. Hydrobiologia. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0842-x.
|
| [2] | Van Soest RWM, Boury-Esnault N, Hooper JNA, Rützler K, de Voogd NJ, et al. The World Porifera Database. Available: http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera. Accessed 2012 Feb 1.
|
| [3] | Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, Pick K, Borchiellini C, et al. (2009) Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol 19: 706–712.
|
| [4] | Pick KS, Philippe H, Schreiber F, Erpenbeck D, Jackson DJ, et al. (2010) Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1983–1987.
|
| [5] | Rapp HT, Janussen D, Tendal OS (2011) Calcareous sponges from abyssal and bathyal depths in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Deep-Sea Res Pt Ii 58: 58–67.
|
| [6] | Manuel M, Borchiellini C, Alivon E, Boury-Esnault N (2004) Molecular phylogeny of calcareous sponges using 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA sequences. Boll Mus Ist Biol Univ Genova 68: 449–461.
|
| [7] | Haeckel E (1872) Die Kalkschw？mme, Band 3: Atlas der Kalkschw？mme (Calcispongien oder Grantien). Berlin: Georg Reimer.
|
| [8] | Haeckel E (1872) Die Kalkschw？mme, Band 1: Biologie der Kalkschw？mme (Calcispongien oder Grantien). 484 p. Georg Reimer.
|
| [9] | Haeckel E (1872) Die Kalkschw？mme, Band 2: System der Kalkschw？mme (Calcispongien oder Grantien). Berlin: Georg Reimer. 416 p.
|
| [10] | Cavalcanti FF, Klautau M (2011) Solenoid: a new aquiferous system to Porifera. Zoomorphology 130: 255–260.
|
| [11] | Dohrmann M, Janussen D, Reitner J, Collins AG, W？rheide G (2008) Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Syst Biol 57: 388–405.
|
| [12] | Rossi AL, Farina M, Borojevic R, Klautau M (2006) Occurrence of five-rayed spicules in a calcareous sponge: Sycon pentactinalis sp. nov. (Porifera: Calcarea). Cah Biol Mar 47: 261–270.
|
| [13] | Manuel M (2006) Phylogeny and evolution of calcareous sponges. Can J Zool 84: 225–241.
|
| [14] | Bidder GP (1898) The skeleton and classification of calcareous sponges. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London 6: 61–76.
|
| [15] | Manuel M, Borojevic R, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J (2002) Class Calcarea Bowerbank 1864. In: Hooper JNA, van Soest RWM, editors. Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. pp. 1103–1110.
|
| [16] | Minchin EA (1896) Suggestions for a Natural Classification of the Asconidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (6) 18: 349–362.
|
| [17] | Hartman WD (1958) A re-examination of Bidder's classification of the Calcarea. Syst Biol 7: 97–110.
|
| [18] | W？rheide G, Hooper JNA (1999) Calcarea from the Great Barrier Reef. 1: Cryptic Calcinea from Heron Island and Wistari Reef (Capricorn-Bunker Group). Mem Queensl Mus 43: 859–891.
|
| [19] | Manuel M, Borchiellini C, Alivon E, Le Parco Y, Vacelet J, et al. (2003) Phylogeny and evolution of calcareous sponges: Monophyly of Calcinea and Calcaronea, high level of morphological homoplasy, and the primitive nature of axial symmetry. Syst Biol 52: 311–333.
|
| [20] | Dohrmann M, Voigt O, Erpenbeck D, W？rheide G (2006) Non-monophyly of most supraspecific taxa of calcareous sponges (Porifera, Calcarea) revealed by increased taxon sampling and partitioned Bayesian analysis of ribosomal DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40: 830–843.
|
| [21] | Vacelet J (1961) The order Pharetronida in Hartman's classification of the Calcarea. Syst Zool 10: 45–47.
|
| [22] | Vacelet J (1981) éponges hypercalcifées (‘Pharétronides’‘Sclérosponges’) des cavités des récifs coralliens de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Bull Mus Nat Hist Natur (Paris) 3: 313–351.
|
| [23] | Borojevic R, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J (1990) A revision of the supraspecific classification of the subclass Calcinea (Porifera, class Calcarea). Bull Mus Nat Hist Natur (Paris), Sec A 12: 243–276.
|
| [24] | Borojevic R, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J (2000) A revision of the supraspecific classification of the subclass Calcaronea (Porifera, class Calcarea). Zoosystema 22: 203–263.
|
| [25] | Hooper JNA, van Soest RWM (2002) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 1810 p.
|
| [26] | Borojevic R, Boury-Esnault N, Manuel M, Vacelet J (2002) Order Leucosolenida Hartman, 1958. In: Hooper JNA, Van Soest RWM, editors. Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. pp. 1157–1184.
|
| [27] | Galtier N, Gouy M, Gautier C (1996) SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 543–548.
|
| [28] | Voigt O, Erpenbeck D, W？rheide G (2008) Molecular evolution of rDNA in early diverging Metazoa: First comparative analysis and phylogenetic application of complete SSU rRNA secondary structures in Porifera. BMC Evol Biol 8: 69.
|
| [29] | Schnare MN, Damberger SH, Gray MW, Gutell RR (1996) Comprehensive comparison of structural characteristics in eukaryotic cytoplasmic large subunit (23 S-like) ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol 256: 701–719.
|
| [30] | Jow H, Hudelot C, Rattray M, Higgs PG (2002) Bayesian phylogenetics using an RNA substitution model applied to early mammalian evolution. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1591–1601.
|
| [31] | Hudelot C, Gowri-Shankar V, Jow H, Rattray M, Higgs PG (2003) RNA-based phylogenetic methods: application to mammalian mitochondrial RNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 28: 241–252.
|
| [32] | Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690.
|
| [33] | Wheeler WC, Honeycutt RL (1988) Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolutionary and phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol 5: 90–96.
|
| [34] | Hancock JM, Tautz D, Dover GA (1988) Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol 5: 393–414.
|
| [35] | Hillis DM, Dixon MT (1991) Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol 66: 411–453.
|
| [36] | Higgs PG (2000) RNA secondary structure: physical and computational aspects. Q Rev Biophys 33: 199–253.
|
| [37] | Savill NJ, Hoyle DC, Higgs PG (2001) RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using maximum-likelihood methods. Genetics 157: 399–411.
|
| [38] | Dixon MT, Hillis DM (1993) Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 10: 256–267.
|
| [39] | Telford MJ, Wise MJ, Gowri-Shankar V (2005) Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the Bilateria. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1129–1136.
|
| [40] | Erpenbeck D, Nichols SA, Voigt O, Dohrmann M, Degnan BM, et al. (2007) Phylogenetic analyses under secondary structure-specific substitution models outperform traditional approaches: Case studies with diploblast LSU. J Mol Evol 64: 543–557.
|
| [41] | Sch？niger M, von Haeseler A (1994) A stochastic model for the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3: 240–247.
|
| [42] | Muse SV (1995) Evolutionary analyses of DNA sequences subject to constraints on secondary structure. Genetics 139: 1429–1439.
|
| [43] | Tillier ERM, Collins RA (1995) Neighbor Joining and Maximum-Likelihood with RNA sequences - addressing the interdependence of sites. Biochem Syst Ecol 12: 7–15.
|
| [44] | Tillier ERM, Collins RA (1998) High apparent rate of simultaneous compensatory base-pair substitutions in ribosomal RNA. Genetics 148: 1993–2002.
|
| [45] | Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
|
| [46] | Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2002) MacClade. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
|
| [47] | Shimodaira H (2002) An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol 51: 492–508.
|
| [48] | Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (2001) CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246–1247.
|
| [49] | Rossi AL, De Moraes Russo CA, Solé-Cava AM, Rapp HT, Klautau M (2011) Phylogenetic signal in the evolution of body colour and spicule skeleton in calcareous sponges. Zool J Linn Soc 163: 1026–1034.
|
| [50] | Borojevic R (1965) éponges Calcaires des C？tes de France I. Amphiute paulini HANTISCH: les generes Amphiute HANITSCH et Paraheteropia n. gen. Arch Zool Exp Gen 106: 665–670.
|
| [51] | Dendy A (1893) Synopsis of the Australian Calcarea Heterocoela; with a proposed classification of the group and descriptions of some new genera and species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 5: 69–116.
|
| [52] | Borojevic R, Klautau M (2000) Calcareous sponges from New Caledonia. Zoosystema 22: 187–201.
|
| [53] | Klautau M, Valentine C (2003) Revision of the genus Clathrina (Porifera, Calcarea). Zool J Linn Soc 139: 1–62.
|
| [54] | Voigt O, Eichmann V, W？rheide G (2011) First evaluation of mitochondrial DNA as a marker for phylogeographic studies of Calcarea: a case study from Leucetta chagosensis. Hydrobiologia. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0800-7.
|
