[1] | Pulliam HR (1973) On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol 38: 419–422.
|
[2] | Foster WA, Treherne JE (1981) Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293: 466–467.
|
[3] | Lima SL (1995) Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect. Anim Behav 49: 11–20.
|
[4] | Giraldeau L-A, Valone T, Templeton JJ (2002) Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Phil Trans R Soc B 357: 1559–1566.
|
[5] | Beauchamp G (2009) How does food density influence vigilance in birds and mammals? Anim Behav 78: 223–231.
|
[6] | Fortin D, Fortin ME (2009) Group-size-dependent association between food profitability, predation risk and distribution of free-ranging bison. Anim Behav 78: 887–892.
|
[7] | Thompson DBA, Lendrem DW (1985) Gulls and plovers: host vigilance, kleptoparasite success and a model of kleptoparasite detection. Anim Behav 33: 1318–1324.
|
[8] | Clark CW, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Pop Biol 30: 45–75.
|
[9] | Cresswell W (1997) Interference competition at low competitor densities in blackbirds Turdus merula. J Anim Ecol 66: 461–471.
|
[10] | Stillman RA, Goss-Custard JD, Caldow RWG (1997) Modelling interference from basic foraging behaviour. J Anim Ecol 66: 692–703.
|
[11] | Robinette R, Ha J (2001) Social and ecological factors influencing vigilance by northwestern crows (Corvus caurinus). Anim Behav 62: 447–552.
|
[12] | Hebblewhite M, Pletscher DH (2002) Effects of elk group size on predation by wolves. Can J Zool 80: 800–809.
|
[13] | Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in Groups, Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
|
[14] | Rowcliffe JM, Pettifor RA, Carbone C (2004) Foraging inequalities in large groups: quantifying depletion experienced by individuals in goose flocks. J Anim Ecol 73: 97–108.
|
[15] | Minderman J, Lind J, Cresswell W (2006) Behaviourally mediated indirect effects: interference competition increases predation mortality in foraging redshanks. J Anim Ecol 75: 713–723.
|
[16] | Sansom A, Cresswell W, Minderman J, Lind J (2008) Vigilance benefits and competition costs in groups: do individual redshanks gain an overall foraging benefit? Anim Behav 75: 1869–1875.
|
[17] | Turchin P (1998) Quantitative Analysis of Movement. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
|
[18] | Borger L, Dalziel BD, Fryxell JM (2008) Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. Ecol Lett 11: 637–650.
|
[19] | Fryxell JM, Hazell M, B?rger L, Dalziel BD, Haydon DT, et al. (2008) Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatiotemporal scales. Proc Nat Am Soc 105: 19114–19119.
|
[20] | Schick RS, Loarie SR, Colchero F, Best BD, Boustany A, et al. (2008) Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. Ecol Lett 11: 1338–1350.
|
[21] | Hawkes C (2009) Linking movement behaviour, dispersal and population processes: is individual variation a key? J Anim Ecol 78: 894–906.
|
[22] | Wakefield ED, Phillips RA, Matthiopoulos J (2009) Quantifying habitat use and preferences of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review. Mar Ecol Progress series 391: 165–182.
|
[23] | Gross JE, Zank C, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE (1995) Movement rules for herbivores in spatially heterogeneous environments: responses to small scale pattern. Landscape Ecol 10: 209–217.
|
[24] | Focardi S, Marcellini PM, Montanaro P (1996) Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patterns. J Anim Ecol 65: 606–620.
|
[25] | Lima SL, Zollner PA (1996) Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 131–135.
|
[26] | White KA, Murray JD, Lewis MA (1996) Wolf-deer interactions: a mathematical model. Proc R Soc B 263: 299–305.
|
[27] | Grünbaum D (1998) Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes. Am Nat 151: 97–115.
|
[28] | Carter J, Finn JT (1999) MOAB: a spatially explicit, individual-based expert system for creating animal foraging models. Ecol Model 119: 29–41.
|
[29] | Moorcroft PR, Lewis MA, Crabtree RL (1999) Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model. Ecology 80: 1656–1665.
|
[30] | Wu H, Li BL, Springer TA, Neill WH (2000) Modeling animal movement as a persistent random walk in two dimensions: expected magnitude of net displacement. Ecol Model 132: 115–124.
|
[31] | Coulon A, Morellet N, Goulard M, Cargnelutti B, Angibaut JM, et al. (2008) Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function. Landscape Ecol 23: 603–614.
|
[32] | Benhamou S (1990) An analysis of movements of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in its home range. Behav Proc 22: 235–250.
|
[33] | Ward D, Saltz D (1994) Foraging at different spatial scales: dorcas gazelles foraging for lilies in the Negev desert. Ecology 75: 48–58.
|
[34] | Bergman CM, Schefer JA, Luttich SN (2000) Caribou movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 123: 364–374.
|
[35] | Morales JM, Ellner SP (2002) Scaling up movement in heterogeneous landscapes: the importance of behavior. Ecology 83: 2240–2247.
|
[36] | Fortin D (2003) Searching behaviour and use of sampling information by free-ranging bison. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54: 194–203.
|
[37] | Fortin D, Morales JM, Boyce MS (2005) Elk winter foraging at fine scale in Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 145: 335–343.
|
[38] | Kareiva RM, Shigesada N (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56: 234–238.
|
[39] | Cain ML (1990) Models of clonal growth in Solidago altissima. J Ecol 78: 27–46.
|
[40] | Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: Mathematical models. Springer-Verlag, New York.
|
[41] | Murray MG (1981) Structure of association in impala, Aepyceros melampus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9: 23–33.
|
[42] | Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red-deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
|
[43] | Lott DF, Minta SC (1983) Random individual association and social group instability in American bison (Bison bison). Z Tierpsychol 61: 153–172.
|
[44] | Southwell CJ (1984) Variability in grouping in the eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus. II. Dynamics of group formation. Austr Wildl Res 11: 437–449.
|
[45] | Carter AJ, Macdonald SL, Thompson V, Goldizen AW (2009) Structured association patterns and their energetic benefits in female eastern grey kangaroos, Macropus giganteus. Anim Behav 77: 839–846.
|
[46] | Le Pendu Y, Briedermanm L, Gerard JF, Maublanc ML (1995) Inter-individual associations and social structure of a mouflon population (Ovis orientalis musimon). Behav Proc 34: 67–80.
|
[47] | Bekenov AB, Grachev IA, Milner-Gulland EJ (1998) The ecology and management of the saiga antelope in Kazakhstan. Mammal Rev 28: 1–52.
|
[48] | Pays O, Benhamou S, Helder R, Geard JF (2007) The dynamics of group formation in large mammalian herbivores: an analysis in the European roe deer. Anim Behav 74: 1429–1441.
|
[49] | Maublanc M-L, Cibien C, Gaillard JM, Maizeret C, Bideau E, et al. (1991) Le chevreuil. Rev Ecol Terre Vie 6: 155–183.
|
[50] | Gerard J-F, Le Pendu Y, Maublanc M-L, Vincent JP, Poulle ML, et al. (1995) Large group formation in European roe deer: an adaptive feature? Rev Ecol Terre Vie 50: 391–401.
|
[51] | San José C, Lovari S, Ferrari N (1997) Grouping in roe deer: an effect of habitat openness or cover distribution. Acta Theriol 42: 235–239.
|
[52] | Villerette N, Marchal C, Pays O, Delorme D, Gerard JF (2006) Do the sexes tend to segregate in field roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)? An analysis of group composition. Can J Zool 84: 787–796.
|
[53] | Frid A (1997) Vigilance by female Dall's sheep: interactions between predation risk factors. Anim Behav 53: 799–808.
|
[54] | Martin P, Bateson P (1993) Measuring Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[55] | Marchal C, Gerard J-F, Boisaubert B, Bideau E (1998) Instability and diurnal variation in size of winter groupings of field roe deer. Rev Ecol Terre Vie 53: 59–68.
|
[56] | Kutner M, Nachtsheim C, Neter J (2004) Applied Linear Regression Models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series, New York.
|
[57] | Maindonald J, Braun WJ (2007) Data analysis and graphics using R: An example-based approach. Cambridge University Press, New York.
|
[58] | Casellas E, Gautrais J, Fournier R, Blanco S, Combe M, et al. (2008) From individual to collective displacements in heterogeneous environments. J Theor Biol 250: 424–434.
|
[59] | Kie JG, Bowyer RT, Nicholson MC, Boroski BB, Loft ER (2002) Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology 83: 530–544.
|
[60] | Anderson DP, Forester JD, Turner MG, Frair JL, Merrill EH, et al. (2005) Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes. Landscape Ecol 20: 257–271.
|
[61] | Kie JG, Ager AA, Bowyer RT (2005) Landscape-level movements of North American elk (Cervus elaphus): effects of habitat patch structure and topography. Landscape Ecol 20: 289–300.
|
[62] | Wall J, Douglas-Hamilton I, Vollrath F (2006) Elephants avoid costly mountaineering. Curr Biol R527–R529.
|
[63] | Smith JNM (1974) The food searching behaviour of two European thrushes. II. The adaptiveness of the search patterns. Behaviour 49: 1–61.
|
[64] | Haskell DG (1997) Experiments and a model examining learning in the area-restricted search behaviour of ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). Behav Ecol 8: 448–455.
|
[65] | Frair JL, Merrill EH, Beyer HL, Morales JM (2008) Thresholds in landscape connectivity and mortality risks in response to growing road networks. J Appl Ecol 45: 1504–1513.
|
[66] | Fortin D, Courtois R, Etcheverry P, Dussault C, Gingras A (2008) Winter selection of landscapes by woodland caribou: behavioural response to geographical gradients in habitat attributes. J Appl Ecol 45: 1392–1400.
|
[67] | Babin J-S, Fortin D, Wilmshurst JF, Fortin ME (2011) Energy gains predict the distribution of plains bison across populations and ecosystems. Ecology 92: 240–252.
|
[68] | Laurian C, Dussault C, Ouellet JP, Courtois R, Poulin M, et al. (2008) Behavior of moose relative to a road network. J Wildl Manage 72: 1550–1557.
|
[69] | Roever CL, Boyce MS, Stenhouse GB (2010) Grizzly bear movements relative to roads: application of step selection functions. Ecography 33: 1113–1122.
|
[70] | Houle M, Fortin D, Dussault C, Courtois R, Ouellet JP (2010) Cumulative effects of forestry on habitat use by gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the boreal forest. Landscape Ecol 25: 419–433.
|
[71] | Hebblewhite M, Merrill E (2008) Modelling wildlife-human relationships for social species with mixed-effects resource selection models. J Appl Ecol 45: 834–844.
|
[72] | Fortin D, Fortin M-E, Beyer HL, Duchesne T, Courant S, et al. (2009) Group-size-mediated habitat selection and group fusion–fission dynamics of bison under predation risk. Ecology 90: 2480–2490.
|
[73] | Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
|
[74] | Farnsworth KD, Illius AW (1998) Optimal diet choice for large herbivores: an extended contingency model. Funct Ecol 12: 74–81.
|
[75] | Fortin D, Fryxell JM, Pilote R (2002) The temporal scale of foraging decisions in bison. Ecology 83: 970–982.
|
[76] | McLoughlin PD, Boyce MS, Coulson T, Clutton-Brock T (2006) Lifetime reproductive success and density-dependent, multi-variable resource selection. Proc R Soc B 273: 1449–1454.
|
[77] | Freeland WJ, Choquenot D (1990) Determinants of herbivore carrying-capacity - Plants, nutrients, and Equus asinus in northern Australia. Ecology 71: 589–597.
|
[78] | Ramp D, Coulson G (2002) Density dependence in foraging habitat preference of eastern grey kangaroos. Oikos 98: 393–402.
|
[79] | Cargnelutti B, Reby D, Desneux L, Angibault JM, Joachim J, et al. (2002) Space use by roe deer in a fragmented landscape some preliminary results. Rev Ecol Terre Vie 57: 29–37.
|
[80] | Coulon A, Cosson JF, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, Galan M, et al. (2004) Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol Ecol 13: 2841–2850.
|
[81] | Robb SE, Grant JWA (1998) Interactions between the spatial and temporal clumping of food affect the intensity of aggression in Japanese medaka. Anim Behav 56: 29–34.
|
[82] | Goldberg JL, Grant JWA, Lefebvre L (2001) Effects of the temporal predictability and spatial clumping of food on the intensity of competitive aggression in the Zenaida dove. Behav Ecol 12: 490–495.
|
[83] | Johnson CA, Grant JWA, Giraldeau L-A (2004) The effect of patch size and competitor number on aggression among foraging house sparrows. Behav Ecol 15: 412–418.
|
[84] | Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB (1985) Group foraging in wild brown hares: effects of resource distribution and social status. Anim Behav 33: 993–999.
|
[85] | Myers JP, Connors PG, Pitelka FA (1981) Optimal territory size and the sanderling: compromises in a variable environment. In: Kamil AC, Sargent TD, editors. Foraging behavior: ecological, ethological and psychological approaches. Garland Press, New York. pp. 135–158.
|
[86] | Grant JWA (1993) Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. Mar Behav Physiol 23: 137–153.
|
[87] | Sueur C, King AJ, Conradt L, Kerth G, Lusseau D, et al. (2011) Collective decision-making and fission–fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework. Oikos 120: 1608–1617.
|
[88] | Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2002) Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biol Rev 77: 77–96.
|
[89] | Ruckstuhl KE, Kokko H (2002) Modelling sexual segregation in ungulates: effects of group size, activity budgets and synchrony. Anim Behav 64: 909–914.
|
[90] | Michelena P, Bouquet PM, Dissac A, Forucassié V, Lauga J, et al. (2004) An experimental test of hypotheses explaining social segregation in dimorphic ungulates. Anim Behav 68: 1371–1380.
|