全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Territorial Dynamics and Stable Home Range Formation for Central Place Foragers

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034033

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Uncovering the mechanisms behind territory formation is a fundamental problem in behavioural ecology. The broad nature of the underlying conspecific avoidance processes are well documented across a wide range of taxa. Scent marking in particular is common to a large range of terrestrial mammals and is known to be fundamental for communication. However, despite its importance, exact quantification of the time-scales over which scent cues and messages persist remains elusive. Recent work by the present authors has begun to shed light on this problem by modelling animals as random walkers with scent-mediated interaction processes. Territories emerge as dynamic objects that continually change shape and slowly move without settling to a fixed location. As a consequence, the utilisation distribution of such an animal results in a slowly increasing home range, as shown for urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes). For certain other species, however, home ranges reach a stable state. The present work shows that stable home ranges arise when, in addition to scent-mediated conspecific avoidance, each animal moves as a central place forager. That is, the animal's movement has a random aspect but is also biased towards a fixed location, such as a den or nest site. Dynamic territories emerge but the probability distribution of the territory border locations reaches a steady state, causing stable home ranges to emerge from the territorial dynamics. Approximate analytic expressions for the animal's probability density function are derived. A programme is given for using these expressions to quantify both the strength of the animal's movement bias towards the central place and the time-scale over which scent messages persist. Comparisons are made with previous theoretical work modelling central place foragers with conspecific avoidance. Some insights into the mechanisms behind allometric scaling laws of animal space use are also given.

References

[1]  Adams ES (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Adv Stud Behav 32: 277–303.
[2]  Gautestad AO, Mysterud I (2005) Intrinsic scaling complexity in animal dispersion and abundance. Am Nat 165: 44–55.
[3]  Kenkre VM, Giuggioli L, Abramson G, Camelo-Neto G (2007) Theory of hantavirus infection spread incorporating localized adult and itinerant juvenile mice. Eur Phys J B 55: 46170.
[4]  Lewis MA, Murray J (1993) Modeling territoriality and wolf deer interactions. Nature 366: 738–40.
[5]  Brown JL, Orians GH (1970) Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1: 23962.
[6]  Giuggioli L, Potts JR, Harris S (2011) Animal interactions and the emergence of territoriality. PLoS Comp Biol 7: 1002008.
[7]  Landim C (1992) Occupation time large deviations of the symmetric simple exclusion process. Ann Probab 20: 20631.
[8]  Harris TE (1965) Diffusion with ‘collisions’ between particles. J Appl Probab 2: 323–38.
[9]  Moorcroft PR, Lewis M (2006) Mechanistic Home Range Analysis. Princeton Univ Press.
[10]  White PCL, Harris S (1994) Encounters between Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes): Implications for Territory Maintenance, Social Cohesion and Dispersal. J Anim Ecol 63: 315–27.
[11]  Giuggioli L, Potts JR, Harris S (2011) Brownian walkers within subdiffusing territorial boundaries. Phys Rev E 83: 061138.
[12]  Giuggioli L, Potts JR, Harris S (2012) Predicting oscillatory dynamics in the movement of territorial animals. J Roy Soc Interface. (in press) doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0797.
[13]  Jetz W, Carbone C, Fulford J, Brown JH (2004) The scaling of animal space use. Science 306: 266–8.
[14]  Soulsbury CD, Iossa G, Baker PJ, White PCL, Harris S (2011) Behavioral and spatial analysis of extraterritorial movements in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Journal of Mammalogy 92: 190–9.
[15]  Harris S, Cresswell WJ, Forde PG, Trewhella WJ, Woollard T, et al. (1990) Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data - a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Rev 20: 97–123.
[16]  Hurst JL (2005) Scent marking and social communication. In: McGregor P, editor. Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press. pp. 219–43.
[17]  Maude G (2010) The spatial ecology and foraging behaviour of the brown hyaena (Hyaena brunnea). PhD thesis, University of Bristol.
[18]  Moorcroft PR, Lewis MA, Crabtree RL (2006) Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone. Proc Roy Soc B 273: 16511659.
[19]  Kang K, Redner S (1985) Fluctuation-Dominated Kinetics in Diffusion-Controlled Reactions. Phys Rev A 32: 435–47.
[20]  Van Kampen NG (1981) Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[21]  Levin S, Durrett R (1994) The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theor Pop Biol 46: 363–94.
[22]  McKane AJ, Newman TJ (2004) Stochastic models in population biology and their deterministic analogs. Phys Rev E 70: 041902.
[23]  Borger L, Dalziel B, Fryxell JM (2008) Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. Ecol Lett 11: 637–50.
[24]  Spencer SR, Cameron GN, Swihart RK (1990) Operationally defining home range: temporal dependence exhibited by hispid cotton rats. Ecology 71: 1817–22.
[25]  Foerster CR, Vaughan C (2002) Home range, habitat use, and activity of Bairds tapir in Costa Rica. Biotropica 34: 423–37.
[26]  Giuggioli L, Abramson G, Kenkre VM, Suzán G, Marcé E, et al. (2005) Diffusion and home range parameters from rodent population measurements in Panama. Bull Math Biol 67: 1135–49.
[27]  Van Moorter B, Visscher D, Benhamou S, B?rger L, Boyce MS, et al. (2009) Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence. Oikos 118: 641–52.
[28]  Briscoe BK, Lewis MA, Parrish SE (2001) Home range formation in wolves due to scent marking. Bull Math Biol 64: 261–84.
[29]  Barlow GW (1974) Hexagonal territories. Anim Behav 22: 876–8.
[30]  Moon P, Spencer DE (1969) Partial Differential Equations. Heath, Lexington.
[31]  Risken H (1996) The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solutions and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[32]  Montroll EW, West BJ (1987) On an enriched collection of stochastic processes. In: Montroll EW, Lebowitz JL, editors. Fluctuation phenomena. Amsterdam: North-Holland. pp. 61–206.
[33]  Potts JR, Harris S, Giuggioli L (2011) An anti-symmetric exclusion process for two particles on an infinite 1D lattice. J Phys A: Math Theor 44: 485003.
[34]  Kac M (1947) Random Walk and the Theory of Brownian Motion. Am Math Monthly 54: 369391.
[35]  Holgate P (1971) Random walk models for animal behavior. In: Patil G, Pielou E, Waters W, editors. Statistical ecology: Sampling and modeling biological populations and population dynamics. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. pp. 1–12.
[36]  Okubo A, Levin SA (2002) Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives. Springer, second edition.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133