全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Effects of Sperm Conjugation and Dissociation on Sperm Viability In Vitro

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034190

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Sperm conjugation is an unusual variation in sperm behavior where two or more spermatozoa physically unite for motility or transport through the female reproductive tract. Conjugation has frequently been interpreted as sperm cooperation, including reproductive altruism, with some sperm advancing their siblings toward the site of fertilization while ostensibly forfeiting their own ability to fertilize through damage incurred during conjugate break-up. Conversely, conjugation has been proposed to protect sensitive regions of spermatozoa from spermicidal conditions within the female reproductive tract. We investigated the possibility of dissociation-induced sperm mortality and tested for a protective function of conjugation using the paired sperm of the diving beetle, Graphoderus liberus. Sperm conjugates were mechanically dissociated and exposed to potentially damaging tissue extracts of the female reproductive tract and somatic tissue. We found no significant difference in viability between paired sperm and dissociated, single sperm. The results further indicate that the reproductive tract of female G. liberus might not be spermicidal and conjugation is not protective of sperm viability when damaging conditions do exist. Our results support the interpretation that, at least in some taxa, sperm conjugation is neither protective nor damaging to sperm viability.

References

[1]  Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR (2009) Sperm Morphological Diversity. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S, editors. Sperm Biology, an Evolutionary Perspective. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 69–149.
[2]  Immler S (2008) Sperm competition and sperm cooperation: the potential role of diploid and haploid expression. Reproduction 135: 275–283.
[3]  Pizzari T, Foster KR (2008) Sperm sociality: Cooperation, altruism, and spite. PLoS Biology 6: e130.
[4]  Sivinski J (1984) Sperm in Competition. In: Smith RL, editor. Sperm Competition and Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. London: Academic Press. pp. 85–115.
[5]  Moore H, Dvo?áková K, Jenkins N, Breed W (2002) Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse. Nature 418: 174–177.
[6]  Moore T, Moore HD (2002) Marsupial sperm pairing: A case of ‘sticky’ green beards? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 112–113.
[7]  Higginson DM, Pitnick S (2011) Evolution of intra-ejaculate sperm interactions: do sperm cooperate? Biological Reviews 87: 249–270.
[8]  Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE (2010) Competition drives cooperation among closely related sperm of deer mice. Nature 463: 801–803.
[9]  Immler S, Moore HDM, Breed WG, Birkhead TR (2007) By hook or by crook? Morphometry, competition and cooperation in rodent sperm. PloS One 2: e170.
[10]  Rodger JC, Bedford JM (1982) Separation of sperm pairs and sperm-egg interactions in the opossum, Didelphis virginiana. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 64: 171–179.
[11]  Yang Y, Elgeti J, Gompper G (2008) Cooperation of sperm in two dimensions: synchronization, attraction, and aggregation through hydrodynamic interactions. Physical Review E 78: 061903.
[12]  Bedford JM, Rodger JC, Breed WG (1984) Why so many mammalian spermatozoa - a clue from Marsupials? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 221: 221–233.
[13]  Phillips DM (1970) Insect sperm: their strucutre and moprhogenesis. Journal of Cell Biology 44: 243–277.
[14]  Fawcett DW (1975) The mammalian spermatozoon. Developmental Biology 44: 394–436.
[15]  Friend DS, Fawcett DW (1974) Membrane differentiations in freeze-fractured mammalian sperm. Journal of Cell Biology 63: 641–664.
[16]  Dallai R, Afzelius BA (1985) Membrane specializations in the paired spermatozoa of dytiscid water beetles. Tissue & Cell 17: 561–572.
[17]  Higginson DM, Miller KB, Segraves KA, Pitnick S (2012) Convergence, recurrence and diversification of complex sperm traits in diving beetles (Dytiscidae). Evolution: . In press.
[18]  Breed WG (2004) The spermatozoon of Eurasian murine rodents: its morphological diversity and evolution. Journal of Morphology 261: 52–69.
[19]  Birkhead TR, M?ller AP, Sutherland WJ (1993) Why do females make it so difficult for males to fertilize their eggs? Journal of Theoretical Biology 161: 51–60.
[20]  Holman L, Snook RR (2006) Spermicide, cryptic female choice and the evolution of sperm form and function. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1660–1670.
[21]  Dallai R, Afzelius BA (1987) Sperm ultrastructure in the water beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera). Bollettino di Zoologia 54: 301–306.
[22]  Higginson DM, Miller KB, Segraves KA, Pitnick S (2012) Female reproductive tract form drives the evolution of complex sperm morphology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA: In press.
[23]  Holman L, Snook RR (2008) A sterile sperm caste protects brother fertile sperm from female-mediated death in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Current Biology 18: 292–296.
[24]  Pitnick S, Wolfner MF, Suarez SS (2009) Ejaculate- and sperm-female interactions. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S, editors. Sperm Biology, an Evolutionary Perspective. London: Elsevier. pp. 247–304.
[25]  Firman RC, Cheam LY, Simmons LW (2011) Sperm competition does not influence sperm hook morphology in selection lines of house mice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 856–862.
[26]  Firman RC, Simmons LW (2009) Sperm competition and the evolution of the sperm hook in house mice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 2505–2511.
[27]  Keller L (2002) Marsupial sperm pairing: a case of ‘sticky’ green beards? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 113.
[28]  Miller KB (2001) On the phylogeny of the Dytiscidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) with emphasis on the morphology of the female reproductive system. Insect Systematics & Evolution 31: 45–92.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133