全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Dimer Formation Enhances Structural Differences between Amyloid β-Protein (1–40) and (1–42): An Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Study

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034345

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Amyloid -protein (A) is central to the pathology of Alzheimer's disease. A 5% difference in the primary structure of the two predominant alloforms, A and A, results in distinct assembly pathways and toxicity properties. Discrete molecular dynamics (DMD) studies of A and A assembly resulted in alloform-specific oligomer size distributions consistent with experimental findings. Here, a large ensemble of DMD–derived A and A monomers and dimers was subjected to fully atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using the OPLS-AA force field combined with two water models, SPCE and TIP3P. The resulting all-atom conformations were slightly larger, less compact, had similar turn and lower -strand propensities than those predicted by DMD. Fully atomistic A and A monomers populated qualitatively similar free energy landscapes. In contrast, the free energy landscape of A dimers indicated a larger conformational variability in comparison to that of A dimers. A dimers were characterized by an increased flexibility in the N-terminal region D1-R5 and a larger solvent exposure of charged amino acids relative to A dimers. Of the three positively charged amino acids, R5 was the most and K16 the least involved in salt bridge formation. This result was independent of the water model, alloform, and assembly state. Overall, salt bridge propensities increased upon dimer formation. An exception was the salt bridge propensity of K28, which decreased upon formation of A dimers and was significantly lower than in A dimers. The potential relevance of the three positively charged amino acids in mediating the A oligomer toxicity is discussed in the light of available experimental data.

References

[1]  Hardy J, Selkoe DJ (2002) The Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease: Progress and Problems on the Road to Therapeutics. Science 297: 353–356.
[2]  Kirkitadze MD, Bitan G, Teplow DB (2002) Paradigm Shifts in Alzheimer's Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Emerging Role of Oligomeric Assemblies. J Neurosci Res 69: 567–577.
[3]  Klein WL (2002) ADDLs & protofibrils - the missing links? Neurobiol Aging 23: 231–233.
[4]  Hardy J (2003) Alzheimer's disease: Genetic evidence points to a single pathogenesis. Ann Neuro 54: 143–144.
[5]  Klein WL, Stine WB, Teplow DB (2004) Small assemblies of unmodified amyloid β-protein are the proximate neurotoxin in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 25: 569–580.
[6]  Glabe CG (2005) Amyloid accumulation and pathogensis of Alzheimer's disease: significance of monomeric, oligomeric and fibrillar Aβ. Subcell Biochem 38: 167–177.
[7]  Roychaudhuri R, Yang M, Hoshi MM, Teplow DB (2008) Amyloid β-protein assembly and Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem 284: 4749–53.
[8]  Jarrett JT, Berger EP, Lansbury PT (1993) The Carboxy Terminus of the β Amyloid Protein is Critical for the Seeding of Amyloid Formation: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease. Biochemistry 32: 4693–4697.
[9]  Jarrett JT, Berger EP, Lansbury PT (1993) The C-terminus of the β protein is critical in amyloidogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 695: 144–148.
[10]  Sawamura N, Morishima-Kawashima M, Waki H, Kobayashi K, Kuramochi T, et al. (2000) Mutant Presenilin 2 Transgenic Mice. A large increase in the levels of Aβ 42 is presumably associated with the low density membrane domain that contains decreased levels of glycerophospholipids and sphingomyelin. J Biol Chem 275: 27901–27908.
[11]  Dahlgren KN, Manelli AM, Stine WB, Baker LK, Krafft GA, et al. (2002) Oligomeric and Fibrillar Species of Amyloid-β Peptides Differentially Affect Neuronal Viability. J Biol Chem 277: 32046–32053.
[12]  Maiti P, Lomakin A, Benedek G, Bitan G (2010) Despite its role in assembly, methionine 35 is not necessary for amyloid β-protein toxicity. J Neurochem 113: 1252–1262.
[13]  McGowan E, Pickford F, Kim J, Onstead L, Eriksen J, et al. (2005) Aβ42 is essential for parenchymal and vascular amyloid deposition in mice. Neuron 47: 191–199.
[14]  Iijima K, Liu H, Chiang A, Hearn S, Konsolaki M, et al. (2004) Dissecting the pathological effects of human Aβ40 and Aβ42 in Drosophila: A potential model for Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 6623–6628.
[15]  Bitan G, Kirkitadze MD, Lomakin A, Vollers SS, Benedek GB, et al. (2003) Amyloid β-protein (Aβ) assembly: Aβ40 and Aβ42 oligomerize through distinct pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 330–335.
[16]  Bernstein SL, Dupuis NF, Lazo ND, Wyttenbach T, Condron MM, et al. (2009) Amyloid-β protein oligomerization and the importance of tetramers and dodecamers in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Chem 1: 326–331.
[17]  Urbanc B, Cruz L, Teplow DB, Stanley HE (2006) Computer Simulations of Alzheimer's Amyloid β-Protein Folding and Assembly. Curr Alzheimer Res 3: 493–504.
[18]  Melquiond A, Dong X, Mousseau N, Derreumaux P (2008) Role of the Region 23–28 in Aβ Fibril Formation: Insights from Simulations of the Monomers and Dimers of Alzheimer's Peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42. Curr Alzheimer Res 5: 244–250.
[19]  Urbanc B, Cruz L, Yun S, Buldyrev SV, Bitan G, et al. (2004) In silico study of amyloid β-protein folding and oligomerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 17345–17350.
[20]  Lam A, Teplow DB, Stanley HE, Urbanc B (2008) Effects of the Arctic (E22!G) Mutation on Amyloid β-Protein Folding: Discrete Molecular Dynamics Study. J Am Chem Soc 130: 17413–17422.
[21]  Urbanc B, Betnel M, Cruz L, Bitan G, Teplow DB (2010) Elucidation of Amyloid β-Protein Oligomerization Mechanisms: Discrete Molecular Dynamics Study. J Am Chem Soc 132: 4266–4280.
[22]  Bitan G, Vollers SS, Teplow DB (2003) Elucidation of Primary Structure Elements Controlling Early Amyloid β-Protein Oligomerization. J Biol Chem 278: 34882–34889.
[23]  Riek R, Güntert P, D?beli H, Wipf B, Wüthrich K (2001) NMR studies in aqueous solution fail to identify significant conformational differences between the monomeric forms of two Alzheimer peptides with widely different plaque-competence, Aβ (1–40)ox and Aβ (1–42)ox. Eur J Biochem 268: 5930–5936.
[24]  Lazo ND, Grant MA, Condron MC, Rigby AC, Teplow DB (2005) On the nucleation of amyloid β-protein monomer folding. Protein Sci 14: 1581–1596.
[25]  Yan Y, Wang C (2006) Aβ42 is More Rigid Than Aβ40 at the C Terminus: Implications for Aβ Aggregation and Toxicity. J Mol Biol 364: 853–862.
[26]  Sgourakis N, Yan Y, McCallum S, Wang C, Garcia A (2007) The Alzheimer's Peptides Aβ40 and 42 Adopt Distinct Conformations in Water: A Combined MD/NMR Study. J Mol Biol 368: 1448–1457.
[27]  Cote S, Derreumaux P, Mousseau N (2011) Distinct Morphologies for Amyloid β Protein Monomer: Aβ1–40, Aβ1–42, and Aβ1–40 (D23N). J Chem Theory Comput 7: 2584–2592.
[28]  Velez-Vega C, Escobedo F (2011) Characterizing the Structural Behavior of Selected Aβ42 Monomers with Different Solubilities. J Phys Chem B 115: 4900–4910.
[29]  Urbanc B, Betnel M, Cruz L, Li H, Fradinger E, et al. (2011) Structural Basis of Aβ1–42 Toxicity Inhibition by Aβ C-Terminal Fragments: Discrete Molecular Dynamics Study. J Mol Biol 410: 316–328.
[30]  Samiotakis A, Homouz D, Cheung M (2010) Multiscale investigation of chemical interference in proteins. J Chem Phys 132: 175101.
[31]  Xu Y, Shen J, Luo X, Zhu W, Chen K, et al. (2005) Conformational transition of amyloid β-peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 5403–5407.
[32]  Luttmann E, Fels G (2006) All-atom molecular dynamics studies of the full-length β-amyloid peptides. Chem Phys 323: 138–147.
[33]  Tomaselli S, Esposito V, Vangone P, van Nuland NAJ, Bonvin AMJJ, et al. (2006) The β-to-β conformational transition of Alzheimer's Aβ-(1–42) peptide in aqueous media is reversible: a step by step conformational analysis suggests the location of β conformation seeding. Chembiochem 7: 257–267.
[34]  Raffa DF, Rauk A (2007) Molecular Dynamics Study of the β Amyloid Peptide of Alzheimer's Disease and Its Divalent Copper Complexes. J Phys Chem B 111: 3789–3799.
[35]  Brovchenko I, Burri R, Krukau A, Oleinikova A, Winter R (2008) Intrinsic thermal expansivity and hydrational properties of amyloid peptide Aβ42 in liquid water. J Chem Phys 129: 195101.
[36]  Triguero L, Singh R, Prabhakar R (2008) Comparative Molecular Dynamics Studies of Wild-Type and Oxidized Forms of Full-Length Alzheimer Amyloid β-Peptides Aβ (1–40) and Aβ (1–42). J Phys Chem B 112: 7123–7131.
[37]  Yang C, Zhu X, Li J, Chen K (2009) Molecular dynamics simulation study on conformational behavior of Aβ (1–40) and Aβ (1–42) in water and methanol. J Mol Struc - THEOCHEM 907: 51–56.
[38]  Bora RP, Prabhakar R (2009) Translational, rotational and internal dynamics of amyloid β-peptides (Aβ40 and Aβ42) from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 131: 155103.
[39]  Davis CH, Berkowitz ML (2009) Structure of the Amyloid-β (1–42) Monomer Absorbed to Model Phospholipid Bilayers: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Biophys J 96: 785–797.
[40]  Rubinstein A, Lyubchenko YL, Sherman S (2009) Dynamic properties of pH-dependent structural organization of the amyloidogenic β-protein (1–40). Prion 3: 31–43.
[41]  Takeda T, Klimov D (2009) Probing the Effect of Amino-Terminal Truncation for Aβ1–40 Peptides. J Phys Chem B 113: 6692–6702.
[42]  Lee C, Ham S (2011) Characterizing Amyloid-Beta Protein Misfolding From Molecular Dynamics Simulations With Explicit Water. J Comput Chem 32: 349–355.
[43]  Wise Scira O, Xu L, Kitahara T, Perry G, Coskuner O (2011) Amyloid-β peptide structure in aqueous solution varies with fragment size. J Chem Phys 135: 205101-1–205101-13.
[44]  Sgourakis N, Merced-Serrano M, Boutsidis C, Drineas P, Du Z, et al. (2011) Atomic-Level Characterization of the Ensemble of the Aβ (1–42) Monomer inWater Using Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Spectral Algorithms. J Mol Biol 368: 1448–1457.
[45]  Ball KA, Phillips AH, Nerenberg PS, Fawzi NL, Wemmer DE, et al. (2011) Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Tertiary Structure Ensembles of Amyloid-β Peptides. Biochemistry 50: 7612–7628.
[46]  Lin YS, Bowman GR, Beauchamp KA, Pande VS (2012) Investigating How Peptide Length and a Pathogenic Mutation Modify the Structural Ensemble of Amyloid Beta Monomer. Biophys J 102: 315–324.
[47]  Fawzi N, Phillips A, Ruscio J, Doucleff M, Wemmer D, et al. (2008) Structure and Dynamics of the Aβ (21–30) Peptide From the Interplay of NMR Experiments and Molecular Simulations. J Am Chem Soc 130: 6145–6158.
[48]  Hess B, van der Vegt N (2006) Hydration Thermodynamic Properties of Amino Acid Analogues: A Systematic Comparison of Biomolecular Force Fields and Water Models. J Phys Chem B 110: 17616–17626.
[49]  Baumketner A, Bernstein SL, Wyttenbach T, Bitan G, Teplow DB, et al. (2006) Amyloid β-protein monomer structure: A computational and experimental study. Protein Sci 15: 420–428.
[50]  Yang M, Teplow DB (2008) Amyloid β-Protein Monomer Folding: Free-Energy Surfaces Reveal Alloform-Specific Differences. J Mol Biol 384: 450–464.
[51]  Mitternacht S, Staneva I, Hard T, Irback A (2010) Comparing the folding free-energy landscapes of Aβ42 variants with different aggregation properties. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 78: 2600–2608.
[52]  Kim S, Takeda T, Klimov DK (2010) Mapping Conformational Ensembles of Aβ Oligomers in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Biophys J 99: 1949–1958.
[53]  Lockhart C, Kim S, Kumar R, Klimov DK (2011) Does amino acid sequence determine the properties of Aβ dimer? J Chem Phys 135: 035103.
[54]  Oda A, Kobayashi K, Takahashi O (2011) Comparison of molecular dynamics simulation methods for amyloid β1–42 monomers containing D-aspartic acid residues for predicting retention times in chromatography. J Chromatogr B 879: 3337–3343.
[55]  Mitternacht S, Staneva I, Hard T, Irback A (2011) Monte Carlo Study of the Formation and Conformational Properties of Dimers of Aβ42 Variants. J Mol Biol 410: 357–367.
[56]  Teplow DB, Lazo ND, Bitan G, Bernstein S, Wyttenbach T, et al. (2006) Elucidating Amyloid β-Protein Folding and Assembly: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Acc Chem Res 39: 635–645.
[57]  Ono K, Condron MM, Teplow DB (2009) Structure-neurotoxicity relationships of amyloid β-protein oligomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 14745–14750.
[58]  Yun S, Urbanc B, Cruz L, Bitan G, Teplow DB, et al. (2007) Role of Electrostatic Interactions in Amyloid β-protein (Aβ) Oligomer Formation: A Discrete Molecular Dynamics Study. Biophys J 92: 4064–4077.
[59]  Williams T, Day I, Serpell L (2010) The Effect of Alzheimer's Aβ Aggregation State on the Permeation of Biomimetic Lipid Vesicles. Langmuir 26: 17260–17268.
[60]  Ding F, Borreguero JM, Buldyrev SV, Stanley HE, Dokholyan NV (2003) Mechanism for the β-Helix to β-Hairpin Transition. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 53: 220–228.
[61]  Urbanc B, Borreguero JM, Cruz L, Stanley HE (2006) Ab initio Discrete Molecular Dynamics Approach to Protein Folding and Aggregation. Methods Enzymol 412: 314–338.
[62]  Streltsov V, Varghese J, Masters C, Nuttall S (2011) Crystal Structure of the Amyloid-β p3 Fragment Provides a Model for Oligomer Formation in Alzheimer's Disease. J Neurosci 31: 1419–1426.
[63]  Coles M, Bicknell W, Watson AA, Fairlie DP, Craik DJ (1998) Solution Structure of Amyloid β-Peptide(1–40) in a Water-Micelle Environment. Is the Membrane-Spanning Domain Where We Think It Is? Biochemistry 37: 11064–11077.
[64]  Crescenzi O, Tomaselli S, Guerrini R, Salvadori S, D'Ursi AM, et al. (2002) Solution structure of the Alzheimer amyloid β-peptide (1–42) in an apolar microenvironment: Similarity with a virus fusion domain. Eur J Biochem 269: 5642–5648.
[65]  Kirkitadze MD, Condron MM, Teplow DB (2001) Identification and Characterization of Key Kinetic Intermediates in Amyloid β-Protein Fibrillogenesis. J Mol Biol 312: 1103–1119.
[66]  Gursky O, Aleshkov S (2000) Temperature-dependent β-sheet formation in β-amyloid Aβ (1–40) peptide in water: uncoupling β-structure folding from aggregation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1476: 93–102.
[67]  Gnanakaran S, Garcia AE (2003) Validation of an All-Atom Protein Force Field: From Dipeptides to Larger Peptides. J Phys Chem B 107: 12555–12557.
[68]  Vitalis A, Pappu R (2009) ABSINTH: A new continuum solvation model for simulations of polypeptides in aqueous solutions. J Comput Chem 30: 673–699.
[69]  Hagarman A, Measey TJ, Mathieu D, Schwalbe H, Schweitzer-Stenner R (2010) Intrinsic Propensities of Amino Acid Residues in GxG Peptides Inferred from Amide I' Band Profiles and NMR Scalar Coupling Constants. J Am Chem Soc 132: 540–551.
[70]  Nerenberg PS, Head-Gordon T (2011) Optimizing Protein-Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Intrinsic Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides. J Chem Theory Comput 7: 1220–1230.
[71]  Takeda T, Klimov D (2009) Interpeptide interactions induce helix to strand structural transition in Aβ peptides. Proteins 77: 1–13.
[72]  Petkova AT, Ishii Y, Balbach JJ, Antzutkin ON, Leapman RD, et al. (2002) A structural model for Alzheimer's β-amyloid fibrils based on experimental constraints from solid state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16742–16747.
[73]  Petkova AT, Yau WM, Tycko R (2006) Experimental Constraints on Quaternary Structure in Alzheimer's β-Amyloid Fibrils. Biochemistry 45: 498–512.
[74]  Sciarretta KL, Gordon DJ, Petkova AT, Tycko R, Meredith SC (2005) Aβ40-Lactam(D23/K28) Models a Conformation Highly Favorable for Nucleation of Amyloid. Biochemistry 44: 6003–6014.
[75]  Finkelstein AV, Ptitsyn OB (2002) Protein Physics: A Course of Lectures. London: Academic Press (An imprint of Elsevier Science).
[76]  Williams T, Serpell L (2011) Membrane and surface interactions of Alzheimer's Aβ peptide – insights into the mechanism of cytotoxicity. FEBS J 278: 3905–3917.
[77]  Usui K, Hulleman JD, Paulsson JF, Siegel SJ, Powers ET, et al. (2009) Site-specific modification of Alzheimer's peptides by cholesterol oxidation products enhances aggregation energetics and neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 18563–18568.
[78]  Sinha S, Lopes DHJ, Du Z, Pang ES, Shanmugam A, et al. (2011) Lysine-Specific Molecular Tweezers are Broad-Spectrum Inhibitors of Assembly and Toxicity of Amyloid Proteins. J Am Chem Soc 133: 16958–16969.
[79]  Luheshi LM, Tartaglia GG, Brorsson AC, Pawar AP, Watson IE, et al. (2007) Systematic In Vivo Analysis of the Intrinsic Determinants of Amyloid β Pathogenicity. PLoS Biol 5: e290.
[80]  Jin M, Shepardson N, Yang T, Chen G, Walsh D, et al. (2011) Soluble amyloid β-protein dimmers isolated from Alzheimer cortex directly induce tau hyperphosphorylation and neuritic degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 5819–5824.
[81]  Wu C, Shea JE (2011) Coarse-grained models for protein aggregation. Curr Opin Struc Biol 209–220.
[82]  Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91: 43–56.
[83]  Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7: 306–317.
[84]  Spoel DVD, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, et al. (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26: 1701–1718.
[85]  Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4: 435–447.
[86]  Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and Testing of the OPLS All- Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118: 11225–11236.
[87]  Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (2001) Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 105: 6474–6487.
[88]  Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP (1987) The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem 91: 6269–6271.
[89]  Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79: 926.
[90]  Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33–38.
[91]  Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M (2007) Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 126: 014101.
[92]  Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52: 7182.
[93]  Frishman D, Argos P (1995) Knowledge-Based Protein Secondary Structure Assignment. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 23: 566–579.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133