Mitosis in the amebo-flagellate Naegleria pringsheimi is acentrosomal and closed (the nuclear membrane does not break down). The large central nucleolus, which occupies about 20% of the nuclear volume, persists throughout the cell cycle. At mitosis, the nucleolus divides and moves to the poles in association with the chromosomes. The structure of the mitotic spindle and its relationship to the nucleolus are unknown. To identify the origin and structure of the mitotic spindle, its relationship to the nucleolus and to further understand the influence of persistent nucleoli on cellular division in acentriolar organisms like Naegleria, three-dimensional reconstructions of the mitotic spindle and nucleolus were carried out using confocal microscopy. Monoclonal antibodies against three different nucleolar regions and α-tubulin were used to image the nucleolus and mitotic spindle. Microtubules were restricted to the nucleolus beginning with the earliest prophase spindle microtubules. Early spindle microtubules were seen as short rods on the surface of the nucleolus. Elongation of the spindle microtubules resulted in a rough cage of microtubules surrounding the nucleolus. At metaphase, the mitotic spindle formed a broad band completely embedded within the nucleolus. The nucleolus separated into two discreet masses connected by a dense band of microtubules as the spindle elongated. At telophase, the distal ends of the mitotic spindle were still completely embedded within the daughter nucleoli. Pixel by pixel comparison of tubulin and nucleolar protein fluorescence showed 70% or more of tubulin co-localized with nucleolar proteins by early prophase. These observations suggest a model in which specific nucleolar binding sites for microtubules allow mitotic spindle formation and attachment. The fact that a significant mass of nucleolar material precedes the chromosomes as the mitotic spindle elongates suggests that spindle elongation drives nucleolar division.
References
[1]
Gatlin JC, Bloom K (2010) Microtubule motors in eukaryotic spindle assembly and maintenance. Semi Cell Dev Biol 21: 248–254.
[2]
Hernandez-Verdun D (2011) Assembly and disassembly of the nucleolus during the cell cycle. Nucleus 2: 189–194.
[3]
Clark CG, Cross GA (1987) rRNA genes of Naegleria gruberi are carried exclusively on a 14-kilobase-pair plasmid. Mol Cell Biol 7: 3027–3031.
[4]
Clark CG, Lai EY, Fulton C, Cross GA (1990) Electrophoretic karyotype and linkage groups of the amoeboflagellate Naegleria gruberi. J Protozool 37: 400–408.
[5]
Fulton C (1970) Amebo-flagellates as research partners: The laboratory biology of Naegleria and Tetramitus. Meth Cell Physiol 4: 341–476.
[6]
Schuster FL (1975) Untrastructure of Mitosis in the Amoeboflagellate Naegleria gruberi. Tissue Cell 7: 1–12.
[7]
Fulton C, Dingle AD (1971) Basal bodies, but not centrioles, in Naegleria. J Cell Biol 51: 826–836.
[8]
González-Robles A, Cristóbal-Ramos AR, González-Lázaro M, Oma？a-Molina M, Martínez-Palomo A (2009) Naegleria fowleri: Light and electron microscopy study of mitosis. Exptl Parasitology 122: 212–217.
[9]
Walsh C (1984) Synthesis and assembly of the cytoskeleton of Naegleria gruberi flagellates. J Cell Biol 98: 449–456.
[10]
Trimbur GM, Walsh CJ (1993) Nucleolus-like morphology produced during the in vitro reassociation of nucleolar components. J Cell Biol 122: 753–766.
[11]
Trimbur GM, Goeckeler JL, Brodsky JL, Walsh CJ (1999) Cloning, sequencing, and nucleolar targeting of the basal-body-binding nucleolar protein BN46/51. J Cell Sci 112: 1159–1168.
[12]
Wadsworth P, Wei-Lih LM, Baskin TI (2010) Variations on theme: spindle assembly in diverse cells. Protoplasma 248: 439–446.
[13]
Pomorski P, Grebecka L (1993) Is actin involved in the nuclear division in Amoeba proteus? Cell Biol Int 17: 521–524.
[14]
Walsh CJ (2007) The role of actin, actomyosin and microtubules in defining cell shape during the differentiation of Naegleria amebae into flagellates. Eur J Cell Biol 86: 85–98.
[15]
Sandquist JC, Kita AM, Bement WM (2011) And the dead shall rise:Actin and myosin return to the spindle. Devel Cell 21: 410–419.
[16]
Trimbur GM, Walsh CJ (1992) BN46/51, a new nucleolar protein, binds to the basal body region in Naegleria gruberi flagellates. J Cell Sci 103: 167–181.
[17]
Chung S, Choa J, Cheona HJ, Paikb S, Lee JH (2002) Cloning and characterization of a divergent α-tubulin that is expressed specifically in dividing amebae of Naegleria gruberi. Gene 293: 77–86.
[18]
Fritz-Laylin LK, Prochnik SE, Ginger ML, Dacks JB, Carpenter ML, et al. (2010) The genome of Naegleria gruberi illuminates early eukaryotic versatility. Cell 140: 631–642.
[19]
De Jonckheere JF (2004) Molecular definition and the ubiquity of species in the genus Naegleria. Protist 155: 89–103.
[20]
Fulton C, Dingle AD (1967) Appearance of the flagellate phenotype in populations of Naegleria amebae. Dev Biol 15: 165–191.
