全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Young Aphids Avoid Erroneous Dropping when Evading Mammalian Herbivores by Combining Input from Two Sensory Modalities

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032706

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Mammalian herbivores may incidentally ingest plant-dwelling insects while foraging. Adult pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) avoid this danger by dropping off their host plant after sensing the herbivore's warm and humid breath and the vibrations it causes while feeding. Aphid nymphs may also drop (to escape insect enemies), but because of their slow movement, have a lower chance of finding a new plant. We compared dropping rates of first-instar nymphs with those of adults, after exposing pea aphids to different combinations of simulated mammalian breath and vibrations. We hypothesized that nymphs would compensate for the greater risk they face on the ground by interpreting more conservatively the mammalian herbivore cues they perceive. Most adults dropped in response to breath alone, but nymphs rarely did so. Breath stimulus accompanied by one concurrent vibrational stimulus, caused a minor rise in adult dropping rates. Adding a second vibration during breath had no additional effect on adults. The nymphs, however, relied on a combination of the two types of stimuli, with a threefold increase in dropping rates when the breath was accompanied by one vibration, and a further doubling of dropping rates when the second vibration was added. The age-specificity of the aphids' herbivore detection mechanism is probably an adaptation to the different cost of dropping for the different age groups. Relying on a combination of stimuli from two sensory modalities enables the vulnerable nymphs to avoid costly mistakes. Our findings emphasize the importance of the direct trophic effect of mammalian herbivory for plant-dwelling insects.

References

[1]  Broom DM (1981) Biology of behaviour: mechanisms, functions and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 329 p.
[2]  Caro TM (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 591 p.
[3]  Fitzgibbon CD (1990) Anti-predator strategies of immature Thomson's gazelles: hiding and the prone response. Anim Behav 40: 846–855.
[4]  Martín J, Luque-Larena JJ, López P (2005) Factors affecting escape behavior of Iberian green frogs (Rana perezi). Can J Zool 83: 1189–1194.
[5]  Cooper WE Jr (1998) Reactive and anticipatory display to deflect predatory attack to an autotomous lizard tail. Can J Zool 76: 1507–1510.
[6]  Lang F, Govind CK, Costello WJ, Greene SI (1977) Developmental neuroethology: changes in escape and defensive behavior during growth of the lobster. Science 197: 682–685.
[7]  Cromarty SI, Mello J, Kass-Simon G (2000) Molt-related and size-dependent differences in the escape response and post-threat behavior of the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Biol Bull 199: 265–277.
[8]  Aoki S, Kurosu U (2010) A review of the biology of Cerataphidini (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Hormaphidinae), focusing mainly on their life cycles, gall formation, and soldiers. Psyche. doi:10.1155/2010/380351.
[9]  Shine R, Sun LX, Fitzgerald M, Kearney M (2002) Antipredator responses of free-ranging pit vipers (Gloydius shedaoensis, Viperidae). Copeia 2002: 843–850.
[10]  Roth ED, Johnson JA (2004) Size-based variation in antipredator behavior within a snake (Agkistrodon piscivorus) population. Behav Ecol 15: 365–370.
[11]  Schultz JC (1981) Adaptive changes in antipredator behavior of a grasshopper during development. Evolution 35: 175–179.
[12]  Levri EP (1998) Perceived predation risk, parasitism, and the foraging behavior of a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Can J Zool 76: 1878–1884.
[13]  Dixon AFG (1987) Parthenogenetic reproduction and the rate of increase in aphids. In: Minks AK, Harrewijn P, editors. Aphids: their biology, natural enemies and control (World crop pests, volume 2A). Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 269–287.
[14]  Frazer BD (1988) Predators. In: Minks AK, Harrewijn P, editors. Aphids: their biology, natural enemies and control (World crop pests, volume 2B). Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 217–230.
[15]  Dixon AFG (1958) The escape responses shown by certain aphids to the presence of the coccinellid Adalia decempunctata (L.). Trans R Entomol Soc London 110: 319–334.
[16]  Dill LM, Fraser AHG, Roitberg BD (1990) The economics of escape behaviour in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Oecologia 83: 473–478.
[17]  Losey JE, Denno RF (1998b) The escape response of pea aphids to foliar-foraging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour. Ecol Entomol 23: 53–61.
[18]  Francke DL, Harmon JP, Harvey CT, Ives AR (2008) Pea aphid dropping behavior diminishes foraging efficiency of a predatory ladybeetle. Entomol Exp Appl 127: 118–124.
[19]  Hartbauer M (2010) Collective defense of Aphis nerii and Uroleucon hypochoeridis (Homoptera, Aphididae) against natural enemies. PLoS ONE 5: e10417.
[20]  Roitberg BD, Myers JH (1979) Behavioural and physiological adaptations of pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) to high ground temperatures and predator disturbance. Can Entomol 111: 515–519.
[21]  Roitberg BD, Myers JH, Frazer BD (1979) The influence of predators on the movement of apterous pea aphids between plants. J Anim Ecol 48: 111–122.
[22]  Losey JE, Denno RF (1998a) Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators. Oecologia 115: 245–252.
[23]  Gish M, Inbar M (2006) Host location by apterous aphids after escape dropping from the plant. J Insect Behav 19: 143–153.
[24]  Nelson EH (2007) Predator avoidance behavior in the pea aphid: costs, frequency, and population consequences. Oecologia 151: 22–32.
[25]  Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20: 297–330.
[26]  Zamora R, Gómez JM (1993) Vertebrate herbivores as predators of insect herbivores: an asymmetrical interaction mediated by size differences. Oikos 66: 223–228.
[27]  Yamazaki K, Sugiura S (2008) Deer predation on leaf miners via leaf abscission. Naturwissenschaften 95: 263–268.
[28]  Gish M, Dafni A, Inbar M (2010) Mammalian herbivore breath alerts aphids to flee host plant. Curr Biol 20: R628–R629.
[29]  Gish M, Dafni A, Inbar M (2011) Avoiding incidental predation by mammalian herbivores: accurate detection and efficient response in aphids. Naturwissenschaften 98: 731–738.
[30]  Roitberg BD, Myers JH (1978a) Adaptation of alarm pheromone responses of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Can J Zool 56: 103–108.
[31]  Clegg JM, Barlow CA (1982) Escape behaviour of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) in response to alarm pheromone and vibration. Can J Zool 60: 2245–2252.
[32]  Castellanos I, Barbosa P (2006) Evaluation of predation risk by a caterpillar using substrate-borne vibrations. Anim Behav 72: 461–469.
[33]  Warkentin KM (2005) How do embryos assess risk? Vibrational cues in predator-induced hatching of red-eyed treefrogs. Anim Behav 70: 59–71.
[34]  Frazer BD, Gilbert N (1976) Coccinellids and aphids: a quantitative study of the impact of adult ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on field populations of pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Entomol Soc B C 73: 33–56.
[35]  Broadbent L, Hollings M (1951) The influence of heat on some aphids. Ann Appl Biol 38: 577–581.
[36]  Tokunaga E, Suzuki N (2008) Colony growth and dispersal in the ant-tended aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch, and the non-ant-tended aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, under the absence of predators and ants. Popul Ecol 50: 45–52.
[37]  Montgomery ME, Nault LR (1978) Effects of age and wing polymorphism on the sensitivity of Myzus persicae to alarm pheromone. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71: 788–790.
[38]  Helfman GS (1989) Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish-trumpetfish interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24: 47–58.
[39]  Soluk DA (1993) Multiple predator effects: predicting combined functional response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. Ecology 74: 219–225.
[40]  Ode PR, Wissinger SA (1993) Interaction between chemical and tactile cues in mayfly detection of stoneflies. Freshwater Biol 30: 351–357.
[41]  Bouwma P, Hazlett BA (2001) Integration of multiple predator cues by the crayfish Orconectes propinquus. Anim Behav 61: 771–776.
[42]  Kim JW, Brown GE, Dolinsek IJ, Brodeur NN, Leduc A, et al. (2009) Combined effects of chemical and visual information in eliciting antipredator behaviour in juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. J Fish Biol 74: 1280–1290.
[43]  Amo L, Lópe P, Martín J (2004) Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges. Anim Behav 67: 647–653.
[44]  Braam J (2005) In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytol 165: 373–389.
[45]  Volkov AG, Pinnock MR, Lowe DC, Gay MS, Markin VS (2011) Complete hunting cycle of Dionaea muscipula: Consecutive steps and their electrical properties. J Plant Physiol 168: 109–120.
[46]  Pavlovi? A, Demko V, Hudák J (2010) Trap closure and prey retention in Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) temporarily reduces photosynthesis and stimulates respiration. Ann Bot 105: 37–44.
[47]  Roitberg BD, Myers JH (1978b) Effect of adult Coccinellidae on the spread of a plant virus by an aphid. J Appl Ecol 15: 775–779.
[48]  McAllister MK, Roitberg BD (1987) Adaptive suicidal behaviour in pea aphids. Nature 328: 797–799.
[49]  Bernasconi ML, Turlings TCJ, Ambrosetti L, Bassetti P, Dorn S (1998) Herbivore-induced emissions of maize volatiles repel the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis. Entomol Exp Appl 87: 133–142.
[50]  Heil M (2004) Direct defense or ecological costs: Responses of herbivorous beetles to volatiles released by wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus). J Chem Ecol 30: 1289–1295.
[51]  Dicke M, Baldwin IT (2010) The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’. Trends Plant Sci 15: 167–175.
[52]  Peccoud J, Ollivier A, Plantegenest M, Simon J-C (2009) A continuum of genetic divergence from sympatric host races to species in the pea aphid complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 7495–7500.
[53]  Kunert G, Belz E, Simon J-C, Weisser WW, Outreman Y (2010) Differences in defensive behaviour between host-adapted races of the pea aphid. Ecol Entomol 35: Suppl. 1147–154.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133