全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Allocating Scarce Resources Strategically - An Evaluation and Discussion of the Global Fund's Pattern of Disbursements

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034749

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background The Global Fund is under pressure to improve its rationing of financial support. This study describes the GF's pattern of disbursements in relation to total health expenditure (THE), government health expenditure (GHE), income status and the burden of HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria. It also examines the potential for recipient countries to increase domestic public financing for health. Methods This is a cross-sectional study of 104 countries that received Global Fund disbursements in 2009. It analyses data on Global Fund disbursements; health financing indicators; government revenue and expenditure; and burden of disease. Findings Global Fund disbursements made up 0.37% of THE across all 104 countries; but with considerable country variation ranging from 0.002% to 53.4%. Global Fund disbursements to government amounted to 0.47% of GHE across the 104 countries, but again with considerable variation (in three countries more than half of GHE was based on Global Fund support). Although the Global Fund provides progressively more funding for lower income countries on average, there is much variation at the country such that here was no correlation between per capita GF disbursements and per capita THE, nor between per capita GF disbursement to government and per capita GHE. There was only a slight positive correlation between per capita GF disbursement and burden of disease. Several countries with a high degree of 'financial dependency' upon the Fund have the potential to increase levels of domestic financing for health. Discussion The Global Fund can improve its targeting of resources so that it better matches the pattern of global need. To do this it needs to: a) reduce the extent to which funds are allocated on a demand-driven basis; and b) align its funding model to broader health systems financing and patterns of health expenditure beyond the three diseases.

References

[1]  The Global Fund (2011) Making a Difference: Global Funds Results Report 2011. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight Against AIDS, TB and Malaria. Available: http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/library/?publications/progressreports/ (Accessed 2012 March 25).
[2]  Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (2010) Financing Global Health 2010: Development assistance and country spending in economic uncertainty. Seattle: IHME.
[3]  The Global Fund (2011) The Final Report of the High-Level Independent Review Panel on Fiduciary Controls and Oversight Mechanisms of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Available: http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/highleve?lpanel/report/ (Accessed 2012 March 25).
[4]  Taskforce on Innovative International Financing for Health Systems (2009) Working Group 1 Report: Constraints to Scaling up and Costs. Available: http://www.internationalhealthpartnershi?p.net//CMS_files/documents/working_group?_1_report:_constraints_to_scaling_up_and?_costs_EN.pdf (Accessed 2012 March 25).
[5]  Glassman A, Duran D, Sumner A (2011) Global Health and the New Bottom Billion: What Do Shifts in Global Poverty and the Global Disease Burden Mean for GAVI and the Global Fund. Washington DC: Centre for Global Development, Working Paper 270.
[6]  Bornemisza O, Bridge J, Olszak-Olszewski M, Sakvarelidze G, Lazarus J (2010) Health aid governance in fragile states: The Global Fund experience. Global Health Governance 4(1): 1–18.
[7]  Snow RW, Okiro EA, Gething PW, Atun R, Hay SI (2010) Equity and adequacy of international donor assistance for global malaria control: an analysis of populations at risk and external funding commitments. Lancet 376: 1409–16.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133