|
The economic burden of patient safety targets in acute care: a systematic reviewDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S33288 Keywords: patient safety, burden of illness, review, quality Abstract: onomic burden of patient safety targets in acute care: a systematic review Review (1850) Total Article Views Authors: Mittmann N, Koo M, Daneman N, McDonald A, Baker M, Matlow A, Krahn M, Shojanai KG, Etchells E Published Date October 2012 Volume 2012:4 Pages 141 - 165 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S33288 Received: 25 April 2012 Accepted: 14 June 2012 Published: 05 October 2012 Nicole Mittmann,1 Marika Koo,1 Nick Daneman,2 Andrew McDonald,3 Michael Baker,4 Anne Matlow,5 Murray Krahn,6 Kaveh Shojania,7 Edward Etchells7 1Health Outcomes and Pharmaco Economics (HOPE) Research Centre, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, 2Division of Infectious Diseases, 3Quality and Patient Safety, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; 4Patient Safety in Ontario, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; 5Infection Prevention and Control and Patient Safety, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; 6Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 7University of Toronto Centre for Patient Safety, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada Background: Our objective was to determine the quality of literature in costing of the economic burden of patient safety. Methods: We selected 15 types of patient safety targets for our systematic review. We searched the literature published between 2000 and 2010 using the following terms: “costs and cost analysis,” “cost-effectiveness,” “cost,” and “financial management, hospital.” We appraised the methodologic quality of potentially relevant studies using standard economic methods. We recorded results in the original currency, adjusted for inflation, and then converted to 2010 US dollars for comparative purposes (2010 US$1.00 = 2010 €0.76). The quality of each costing study per patient safety target was also evaluated. Results: We screened 1948 abstracts, and identified 158 potentially eligible studies, of which only 61 (39%) reported any costing methodology. In these 61 studies, we found wide estimates of the attributable costs of patient safety events ranging from $2830 to $10,074. In general hospital populations, the cost per case of hospital-acquired infection ranged from $2132 to $15,018. Nosocomial bloodstream infection was associated with costs ranging from $2604 to $22,414. Conclusion: There are wide variations in the estimates of economic burden due to differences in study methods and methodologic quality. Greater attention to methodologic standards for economic evaluations in patient safety is needed.
|