全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Less Is More: Latent Learning Is Maximized by Shorter Training Sessions in Auditory Perceptual Learning

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036929

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background The time course and outcome of perceptual learning can be affected by the length and distribution of practice, but the training regimen parameters that govern these effects have received little systematic study in the auditory domain. We asked whether there was a minimum requirement on the number of trials within a training session for learning to occur, whether there was a maximum limit beyond which additional trials became ineffective, and whether multiple training sessions provided benefit over a single session. Methodology/Principal Findings We investigated the efficacy of different regimens that varied in the distribution of practice across training sessions and in the overall amount of practice received on a frequency discrimination task. While learning was relatively robust to variations in regimen, the group with the shortest training sessions (~8 min) had significantly faster learning in early stages of training than groups with longer sessions. In later stages, the group with the longest training sessions (>1 hr) showed slower learning than the other groups, suggesting overtraining. Between-session improvements were inversely correlated with performance; they were largest at the start of training and reduced as training progressed. In a second experiment we found no additional longer-term improvement in performance, retention, or transfer of learning for a group that trained over 4 sessions (~4 hr in total) relative to a group that trained for a single session (~1 hr). However, the mechanisms of learning differed; the single-session group continued to improve in the days following cessation of training, whereas the multi-session group showed no further improvement once training had ceased. Conclusions/Significance Shorter training sessions were advantageous because they allowed for more latent, between-session and post-training learning to emerge. These findings suggest that efficient regimens should use short training sessions, and optimized spacing between sessions.

References

[1]  Aberg KC, Tartaglia EM, Herzog MH (2009) Perceptual learning with Chevrons requires a minimal number of trials, transfers to untrained directions, but does not require sleep. Vision Res 49: 2087–2094.
[2]  Wright BA, Sabin AT (2007) Perceptual learning: how much daily training is enough? Exp Brain Res 180: 727–736.
[3]  Goedert KM, Miller J (2008) Spacing practice sessions across days earlier rather than later in training improves performance of a visuomotor skill. Exp Brain Res 189: 189–197.
[4]  Donovan JJ, Radosevich DJ (1999) A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t. J Appl Psychol 84: 795–805.
[5]  Halliday LF, Taylor JL, Edmondson-Jones AM, Moore DR (2008) Frequency discrimination learning in children. J Acoust Soc Am 123: 4393–4402.
[6]  Karni A, Sagi D (1991) Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 4966–4970.
[7]  Schoups AA, Vogels R, Orban GA (1995) Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity. J Physiol 483 (Pt 3): 797–810.
[8]  Amitay S, Irwin A, Moore DR (2006) Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nat Neurosci 9: 1446–1448.
[9]  Demany L (1985) Perceptual learning in frequency discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 78: 1118–1120.
[10]  Karni A, Sagi D (1993) The time course of learning a visual skill. Nature 365: 250–252.
[11]  Stickgold R, Whidbee D, Schirmer B, Patel V, Hobson JA (2000) Visual discrimination task improvement: A multi-step process occurring during sleep. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 246–254.
[12]  Banai K, Ortiz JA, Oppenheimer JD, Wright BA (2010) Learning two things at once: differential constraints on the acquisition and consolidation of perceptual learning. Neuroscience 165: 436–444.
[13]  Qu Z, Song Y, Ding Y (2010) ERP evidence for distinct mechanisms of fast and slow visual perceptual learning. Neuropsychologia 48: 1869–1874.
[14]  Atienza M, Cantero JL, Dominguez-Marin E (2002) The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning. Learn Memory 9: 138–150.
[15]  Atienza M, Cantero JL, Stickgold R (2004) Posttraining sleep enhances automaticity in perceptual discrimination. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 53–64.
[16]  Hauptmann B, Karni A (2002) From primed to learn: the saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long-term memory. Cognition Brain Res 13: 313–322.
[17]  Hauptmann B, Reinhart E, Brandt SA, Karni A (2005) The predictive value of the leveling off of within session performance for procedural memory consolidation. Cognition Brain Res 24: 181–189.
[18]  Ortiz JA, Wright BA (2010) Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill. Exp Brain Res 201: 441–451.
[19]  Hussain Z, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ (2009) How much practice is needed to produce perceptual learning? Vision Res 49: 2624–2634.
[20]  Heathcote A, Brown S, Mewhort DJ (2000) The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychon B Rev 7: 185–207.
[21]  Dosher BA, Lu ZL (2007) The functional form of performance improvements in perceptual learning: learning rates and transfer. Psychol Sci 18: 531–539.
[22]  Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D (2006) Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol Bull 132: 354–380.
[23]  Ahissar M, Hochstein S (1997) Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning. Nature 387: 401–406.
[24]  Ahissar M, Hochstein S (2004) The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 457–464.
[25]  Amitay S, Hawkey DJ, Moore DR (2005) Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability. Percept Psychophys 67: 691–698.
[26]  British Society of Audiology (2004) Recommended procedure for pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking and determination of uncomfortable loudness levels.
[27]  Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49: Suppl 2: 467+.
[28]  Wechsler D (1999) WASI: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
[29]  Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001) The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63: 1293–1313.
[30]  Censor N, Karni A, Sagi D (2006) A link between perceptual learning, adaptation and sleep. Vision Res 46: 4071–4074.
[31]  Censor N, Sagi D (2008) Benefits of efficient consolidation: short training enables long-term resistance to perceptual adaptation induced by intensive testing. Vision Res 48: 970–977.
[32]  Kuriyama K, Stickgold R, Walker MP (2004) Sleep-dependent learning and motor-skill complexity. Learn Memory 11: 705–713.
[33]  Wright BA, Sabin AT, Zhang Y, Marrone N, Fitzgerald MB (2010) Enhancing perceptual learning by combining practice with periods of additional sensory stimulation. J Neurosci 30: 12868–12877.
[34]  Moore BC (1973) Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. J Acoust Soc Am 54: 610–619.
[35]  Levi DM, Li RW (2009) Perceptual learning as a potential treatment for amblyopia: a mini-review. Vision Res 49: 2535–2549.
[36]  McCollough C (1965) Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System. Science 149: 1115–1116.
[37]  Vul E, Krizay E, MacLeod DI (2008) The McCollough effect reflects permanent and transient adaptation in early visual cortex. J Vision 8: 4 1–12:
[38]  Amitay S, Irwin A, Hawkey DJ, Cowan JA, Moore DR (2006) A comparison of adaptive procedures for rapid and reliable threshold assessment and training in naive listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 119: 1616–1625.
[39]  Wright BA, Wilson RM, Sabin AT (2010) Generalization lags behind learning on an auditory perceptual task. J Neurosci 30: 11635–11639.
[40]  Amitay S (2009) Forward and reverse hierarchies in auditory perceptual learning. Learn Percept 1: 59–68.
[41]  Demany L, Semal C (2002) Learning to perceive pitch differences. J Acoust Soc Am 111: 1377–1388.
[42]  Lavie N (2005) Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 75–82.
[43]  Anderson RB (2001) The power law as an emergent property. Mem Cognit 29: 1061–1068.
[44]  Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. The concepts of power analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133