The N-end rule pathway is a proteolytic system in which its recognition components (N-recognins) recognize destabilizing N-terminal residues of short-lived proteins as an essential element of specific degrons, called N-degrons. The RING E3 ligases UBR2 and UBR1 are major N-recognins that share size (200 kDa), conserved domains and substrate specificities to N-degrons. Despite the known function of the N-end rule pathway in degradation of cytosolic proteins, the major phenotype of UBR2-deficient male mice is infertility caused by arrest of spermatocytes at meiotic prophase I. UBR2-deficient spermatocytes are impaired in transcriptional silencing of sex chromosome-linked genes and ubiquitylation of histone H2A. In this study we show that the recruitment of UBR2 to meiotic chromosomes spatiotemporally correlates to the induction of chromatin-associated ubiquitylation, which is significantly impaired in UBR2-deficient spermatocytes. UBR2 functions as a scaffold E3 that promotes HR6B/UbcH2-dependent ubiquitylation of H2A and H2B but not H3 and H4, through a mechanism distinct from typical polyubiquitylation. The E3 activity of UBR2 in histone ubiquitylation is allosterically activated by dipeptides bearing destabilizing N-terminal residues. Insufficient monoubiquitylation and polyubiquitylation on UBR2-deficient meiotic chromosomes correlate to defects in double strand break (DSB) repair and other meiotic processes, resulting in pachytene arrest at stage IV and apoptosis. Some of these functions of UBR2 are observed in somatic cells, in which UBR2 is a chromatin-binding protein involved in chromatin-associated ubiquitylation upon DNA damage. UBR2-deficient somatic cells show an array of chromosomal abnormalities, including hyperproliferation, chromosome instability, and hypersensitivity to DNA damage-inducing reagents. UBR2-deficient mice enriched in C57 background die upon birth with defects in lung expansion and neural development. Thus, UBR2, known as the recognition component of a major cellular proteolytic system, is associated with chromatin and controls chromatin dynamics and gene expression in both germ cells and somatic cells.
References
[1]
Bachmair A, Finley D, Varshavsky A (1986) In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234: 179–186.
[2]
Sriram SM, Kim BY, Kwon YT (2011) The N-end rule pathway: emerging functions and molecular principles of substrate recognition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 735–747.
[3]
Tasaki T, Sriram SM, Park KS, Kwon YT (2012) The N-end rule pathway. Ann Rev Biochem. In press.
[4]
Sriram SM, Kwon YT (2010) The molecular principles of N-end rule recognition. Nat Strct Mol Biol 17: 1164–1165.
[5]
Tasaki T, Kwon YT (2007) The mammalian N-end rule pathway: new insights into its components and physiological roles. Trends Biochem Sci 32: 520–528.
[6]
Kwon YT, Reiss Y, Fried VA, Hershko A, Yoon JK, et al. (1998) The mouse and human genes encoding the recognition component of the N-end rule pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 7898–7903.
[7]
Kwon YT, Xia Z, Davydov IV, Lecker SH, Varshavsky A (2001) Construction and analysis of mouse strains lacking the ubiquitin ligase UBR1 (E3alpha) of the N-end rule pathway. Mol Cell Biol 21: 8007–8021.
[8]
Kwon YT, Kashina AS, Varshavsky A (1999) Alternative splicing results in differential expression, activity, and localization of the two forms of arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase, a component of the N-end rule pathway. Mol Cell Biol 19: 182–193.
[9]
Tasaki T, Mulder LC, Iwamatsu A, Lee MJ, Davydov IV, et al. (2005) A family of mammalian E3 ubiquitin ligases that contain the UBR box motif and recognize N-degrons. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7120–7136.
[10]
Kwon YT, Kashina AS, Davydov IV, Hu RG, An JY, et al. (2002) An essential role of N-terminal arginylation in cardiovascular development. Science 297: 96–99.
[11]
Kwon YT, Xia Z, An JY, Tasaki T, Davydov IV, et al. (2003) Female lethality and apoptosis of spermatocytes in mice lacking the UBR2 ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway. Mol Cell Biol 23: 8255–8271.
[12]
Wang H, Piatkov KI, Brower CS, Varshavsky A (2009) Glutamine-specific N-terminal amidase, a component of the N-end rule pathway. Mol Cell 34: 686–695.
[13]
Lee MJ, Tasaki T, Moroi K, An JY, Kimura S, et al. (2005) RGS4 and RGS5 are in vivo substrates of the N-end rule pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15030–15035.
[14]
Hu RG, Brower CS, Wang H, Davydov IV, Sheng J, et al. (2006) Arginyltransferase, its specificity, putative substrates, bidirectional promoter, and splicing-derived isoforms. J Biol Chem 281: 32559–32573.
[15]
Hu RG, Sheng J, Qi X, Xu Z, Takahashi TT, et al. (2005) The N-end rule pathway as a nitric oxide sensor controlling the levels of multiple regulators. Nature 437: 981–986.
[16]
Tasaki T, Zakrzewska A, Dudgeon DD, Jiang Y, Lazo JS, et al. (2009) The substrate recognition domains of the N-end rule pathway. J Biol Chem 284: 1884–1895.
[17]
Tasaki T, Sohr R, Xia Z, Hellweg R, Hortnagl H, et al. (2007) Biochemical and genetic studies of UBR3, a ubiquitin ligase with a function in olfactory and other sensory systems. J Biol Chem 282: 18510–18520.
[18]
Xia Z, Webster A, Du F, Piatkov K, Ghislain M, et al. (2008) Substrate-binding sites of UBR1, the ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway. J Biol Chem 283: 24011–24028.
[19]
Lee MJ, Pal K, Tasaki T, Roy S, Jiang Y, et al. (2008) Synthetic heterovalent inhibitors targeting recognition E3 components of the N-end rule pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 100–105.
[20]
Perry J, Palmer S, Gabriel A, Ashworth A (2001) A short pseudoautosomal region in laboratory mice. Genome Res 11: 1826–1832.
[21]
Handel MA (2004) The XY body: a specialized meiotic chromatin domain. Exp Cell Res 296: 57–63.
[22]
Monesi V (1965) Differential rate of ribonucleic acid synthesis in the autosomes and sex chromosomes during male meiosis in the mouse. Chromosoma 17: 11–21.
[23]
Turner JM (2007) Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Development 134: 1823–1831.
[24]
Wiltshire T, Park C, Handel MA (1998) Chromatin configuration during meiosis I prophase of spermatogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 49: 70–80.
[25]
Raman R, Das P (1991) Mammalian sex chromosomes. III. Activity of pseudoautosomal steroid sulfatase enzyme during spermatogenesis in Mus musculus. Somat Cell Mol Genet 17: 429–433.
[26]
Burgoyne PS (1982) Genetic homology and crossing over in the X and Y chromosomes of Mammals. Hum Genet 61: 85–90.
[27]
Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, et al. (2005) Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet 37: 41–47.
[28]
Schimenti J (2005) Synapsis or silence. Nat Genet 37: 11–13.
[29]
An JY, Kim EA, Jiang Y, Zakrzewska A, Kim DE, et al. (2010) UBR2 mediates transcriptional silencing during spermatogenesis via histone ubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 1912–1917.
[30]
Baarends WM, Hoogerbrugge JW, Roest HP, Ooms M, Vreeburg J, et al. (1999) Histone ubiquitination and chromatin remodeling in mouse spermatogenesis. Dev Biol 207: 322–333.
[31]
Baarends WM, Wassenaar E, van der Laan R, Hoogerbrugge J, Sleddens-Linkels E, et al. (2005) Silencing of unpaired chromatin and histone H2A ubiquitination in mammalian meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 25: 1041–1053.
[32]
Baarends WM, Wassenaar E, Hoogerbrugge JW, Schoenmakers S, Sun ZW, et al. (2007) Increased phosphorylation and dimethylation of XY body histones in the Hr6b-knockout mouse is associated with derepression of the X chromosome. J Cell Sci 120: 1841–1851.
[33]
Lu LY, Wu J, Ye L, Gavrilina GB, Saunders TL, et al. (2010) RNF8-dependent histone modifications regulate nucleosome removal during spermatogenesis. Dev Cell 18: 371–384.
[34]
Roest HP, van Klaveren J, de Wit J, van Gurp CG, Koken MH, et al. (1996) Inactivation of the HR6B ubiquitin-conjugating DNA repair enzyme in mice causes male sterility associated with chromatin modification. Cell 86: 799–810.
[35]
Varshavsky A (1996) The N-end rule: functions, mysteries, uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 12142–12149.
[36]
Varshavsky A (2011) The N-end rule pathway and regulation by proteolysis. Protein Sci 20: 1298–1345.
[37]
Yang F, Cheng Y, An JY, Kwon YT, Eckardt S, et al. (2010) The ubiquitin ligase Ubr2, a recognition E3 component of the N-end rule pathway, stabilizes Tex19.1 during spermatogenesis. PloS one 5: e14017.
[38]
Santos MA, Huen MS, Jankovic M, Chen HT, Lopez-Contreras AJ, et al. (2010) Class switching and meiotic defects in mice lacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF8. J Exp Med 207: 973–981.
[39]
Fujimuro M, Sawada H, Yokosawa H (1994) Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific to multi-ubiquitin chains of polyubiquitinated proteins. FEBS Lett 349: 173–180.
[40]
Turner JM, Aprelikova O, Xu X, Wang R, Kim S, et al. (2004) BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphorylation, and male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Curr Biol 14: 2135–2142.
[41]
Turner GC, Du F, Varshavsky A (2000) Peptides accelerate their uptake by activating a ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. Nature 405: 579–583.
[42]
Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, et al. (2001) Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet 27: 271–276.
[43]
Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD (2000) The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell 6: 975–987.
[44]
Baker SM, Plug AW, Prolla TA, Bronner CE, Harris AC, et al. (1996) Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat Genet 13: 336–342.
[45]
Garcia-Higuera I, Taniguchi T, Ganesan S, Meyn MS, Timmers C, et al. (2001) Interaction of the Fanconi anemia proteins and BRCA1 in a common pathway. Mol Cell 7: 249–262.
[46]
Moens PB, Kolas NK, Tarsounas M, Marcon E, Cohen PE, et al. (2002) The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J Cell Sci 115: 1611–1622.
[47]
Masson JY, West SC (2001) The Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases: a non-identical twin relationship. Trends Biochem Sci 26: 131–136.
[48]
Royo H, Polikiewicz G, Mahadevaiah SK, Prosser H, Mitchell M, et al. (2010) Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr Biol 20: 2117–2123.
[49]
Ouyang Y, Kwon YT, An JY, Eller D, Tsai SC, et al. (2006) Loss of Ubr2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, leads to chromosome fragility and impaired homologous recombinational repair. Mutat Res 596: 64–75.
[50]
Gao Y, Ferguson DO, Xie W, Manis JP, Sekiguchi J, et al. (2000) Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development. Nature 404: 897–900.
[51]
Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA (2009) RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 399–434.
[52]
Yoshida K, Kondoh G, Matsuda Y, Habu T, Nishimune Y, et al. (1998) The mouse RecA-like gene Dmc1 is required for homologous chromosome synapsis during meiosis. Mol Cell 1: 707–718.
[53]
Barlow C, Liyanage M, Moens PB, Tarsounas M, Nagashima K, et al. (1998) Atm deficiency results in severe meiotic disruption as early as leptonema of prophase I. Development 125: 4007–4017.
[54]
Kneitz B, Cohen PE, Avdievich E, Zhu L, Kane MF, et al. (2000) MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev 14: 1085–1097.
[55]
Kuznetsov S, Pellegrini M, Shuda K, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Liu Y, et al. (2007) RAD51C deficiency in mice results in early prophase I arrest in males and sister chromatid separation at metaphase II in females. J Cell Biol 176: 581–592.
[56]
Xu X, Aprelikova O, Moens P, Deng CX, Furth PA (2003) Impaired meiotic DNA-damage repair and lack of crossing-over during spermatogenesis in BRCA1 full-length isoform deficient mice. Development 130: 2001–2012.
[57]
Cohen PE, Pollard JW (2001) Regulation of meiotic recombination and prophase I progression in mammals. Bioessays 23: 996–1009.
[58]
Huen MS, Grant R, Manke I, Minn K, Yu X, et al. (2007) RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 131: 901–914.
[59]
Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Faustrup H, Melander F, Bartek J, et al. (2007) RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131: 887–900.
[60]
Byrd C, Turner GC, Varshavsky A (1998) The N-end rule pathway controls the import of peptides through degradation of a transcriptional repressor. EMBO J 17: 269–277.
[61]
Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P (1997) A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res 5: 66–68.
