全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Management Implications of the Biodiversity and Socio-Economic Impacts of Shrimp Trawler By-Catch in Bahía de Kino, Sonora, México

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035609

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The shrimp fishery is the most economically important fishery in Mexico. The trawler-based portion of this fishery results in high rates of by-catch. This study quantifies and describes the biodiversity of by-catch associated with trawling in the Bahía de Kino region of Sonora, Mexico. Data were collected from 55 trawls, on six boats, over 14 nights, during November of 2003, 2004, 2006–2009. By-catch rates within trawl samples averaged 85.9% measured by weight. A total of 183 by-catch species were identified during the course of this study, including 97 species of bony fish from 43 families, 19 species of elasmobranchs from 12 families, 66 species of invertebrates from eight phyla, and one species of marine turtle; seven of the documented by-catch species are listed on the IUCN Red List, CITES, or the Mexican NOM-059-ECOL-2010; 35 species documented in the by-catch are also targeted by local artisanal fishers. Some of the species frequently captured as juveniles in the by-catch are economically important to small-scale fishers in the region, and are particularly sensitive to overexploitation due to their life histories. This study highlights the need for further research quantifying the impacts of high levels of by-catch upon small-scale fishing economies in the region and presents strong ecological and economic rationale for by-catch management within the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of California. Site-specific by-catch management plans should be piloted in the Bahía de Kino region to address the growing momentum in national and international fisheries policy regimes toward the reduction of by-catch in shrimp fisheries.

References

[1]  Gillett R (2008) Global study of shrimp fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 475. Rome: FAO. 331 p. Available: http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0300e/i03?00e00.htm Accessed: 2011 June 01.
[2]  Kelleher K (2005) Discards in the world’s marine fisheries. An update. FAO Fish Tech Pap. No. 470. Rome: FAO. 131 p. Available: http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5936e/y59?36e00.htm Accessed: 2011 June 01.
[3]  Alverson DL, Freeberg MH, Pope JG, Murawski SA (1994) A global assessment of fisheries by-catch and discards. FAO Fish Tech Pap. No. 339. Rome: FAO. 233p. Available: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/T4890E/T48?90E00.HTM Accessed: 2011 June 01.
[4]  Davies RWD, Cripps SJ, Nickson A, Porter G (2009) Defining and estimating global marine fisheries by-catch. Mar Pol 33: 661–672. Available: http://assets.panda.org/downloads/bycatc?h_paper.pdf Accessed: 2011 June 01.
[5]  Young RH, Romero JM (1979) Variability in the yield and composition of by-catch recovered from Gulf of California shrimping vessels. Trop Sci 21: 249.64
[6]  Pérez-Mellado J, Findley LT (1985) Evaluacíon de la ictiofauna acompa?ante del camarón capturado en las costas de Sonora y norte de Sinaloa, México, Cap. 5:201–254. In: Ya?ez-Arancibia A, editor. UNAM, México, D.F. 748 p.
[7]  López-Martínez J, Herrera-Valdivia E, et al. (2010) Peces de la fauna de acompa?amiento en la pesca industrial de camarón en el Golfo de California, México. Rev Biol Trop 58: 925–942. Available: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?pid=S?0034-77442010000300010&script=sci_arttex?t Accessed: 2010 September 30.
[8]  [SAGARPA] Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentacíon (2009) Anuario Estadístico De Pesca 2009. Available: www.sagarpa.gob.mx Accessed: 2010 December 08.
[9]  Magallón-Barajas FJ (1987) The Pacific shrimp fishery of Mexico. CalCOFI Rep 28: 43.52
[10]  [INP] Instituto Nacional de la Pesca (2000) Catálogo de los sistemas de captura de las principales pesquerías comerciales. México: SAGARPA. 94 p.
[11]  Meltzer L, Chang JO (2006) Export market influence on the development of the Pacific shrimp fishery of Sonora, Mexico. Ocean Coast Manage 49: 222.235
[12]  [CONAPESCA] Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca (2011) Disminuye Conapesca el número de embarcaciones camaroneras en el país. Available: http://www.conapesca.sagarpa.gob.mx/wb/c?ona/16_de_diciembre_de_2011_mazatlan_sin?Accessed 2012 January 2.
[13]  Balton DA (2010) Certifications Pursuant to Section 609 of Public Law 101–162, Public Notice 7013. Federal Register. 75: 27855–27856. Available: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/?getpage.cgi? position = all&page = 27855&dbname = 2010_register Accessed: 2011 April 06.
[14]  García-Caudillo JM, Cisneros-Mata MA, Balmori-Ramírez A (2000) Performance of a bycatch reduction device in the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Biol Conservat 92: 199.205
[15]  Heredia Quevedo JA (2001) Shrimp trawl design improvements suggested for Mexican fisheries [unpublished thesis]. Reykjavik (IS): United Nations University. 56 p. Available: http://www.unuftp.is/static/fellows/docu?ment/joseprf.pdf Accessed: 2011 June 01.
[16]  FAO. Report of the Expert Consultation on International Guidelines for Bycatch Management and Reduction of Discards. Rome, 30 November–3 December 2009. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report. No. 934. Rome, FAO. 2010: 28p.
[17]  Nava Romero JM (1994) Impactos, a corto y largo plazo, en la diversidad y otras características ecológicas de la comunidad béntico-demersal capturada por la pesquería de camerón en el norte del alto Golfo de California, México [unpublished Msc thesis]. Guaymas (MX): Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. 84 p.
[18]  García-Caudillo JM, Gómez Palafóx JV (2005) La pesca industrial de camerón en el Golfo de California: Situación económico-financiera e impactos socio-ambientales. Guaymas, Sonora, México: Concervacíon Internacional-Regíon Golfo de California. 104 p.
[19]  Madrid-Vera J, Amezcua F, Morales-Bojórquez E (2007) An assessment approach to estimate biomass of fish communities from by-catch data in a tropical shrimp-trawl fishery. Fish Res 83: 81.89
[20]  Madrid-Vera J, Visauta-Girbau E, Aquirre-Villase?or H (2010) Composition of trawl catch fauna off the mouth of the Rio Baluarte, southeastern Gulf of California. Mar Ecol Progr 403: 145.153
[21]  Rabago-Quiros CH, López-Martínez J, Valdez-Holguín JE, Nevarez Martínez MO (2011) Distribución latitudinal y batimétrica de las especies más abundantes y frecuentes en la fauna acompa?ante del camarón del Golfo de California, México. Rev Biol Trop 59: 255.267
[22]  [WRI] World Resources Institute (2004) Fishing for answers: Making sense of the global fish crisis. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute. Available: http://pdf.wri.org/fishanswer_fulltext.p?df Accessed: 2011 April 17.
[23]  Moreno C, Weaver A, Bourillón L, Torre J, égido J, Rojo M (2005) Diagnóstico ambiental y socioeconómico de la región marina-costera de Bahía de Kino, Isla Tiburón, Sonora México: Documento de trabajo y discusión para promover un desarrollo sustentable. México: Comunidad y Biodiversidad. 88 p. Available: http://www.cobi.org.mx/publicaciones/cob?i_rep_diagn_bahia_kino_051116.pdf Accessed: 2011 June 01.
[24]  Glenn EP, Nagler PL, Brusca RC, Hinojosa-Huerta O (2006) Coastal wetlands of the northern Gulf of California: Inventory and conservation status. Aquat Conservat Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 16: 5.28
[25]  Brusca RC, Kimrey E, Moore W (2004) A seashore guide to the northern Gulf of California. Tucson: Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum. 203 p.
[26]  [CITES] Convention on the International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna. UNEP-WCMC Species Database: CITES-Listed Species. Available: http://www.cites.org/eng/resources/speci?es.html Accessed: 2010 March 09.
[27]  [SEMARNAT]Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (2010) NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación.30 Diciembre 2010. 2:1–77. Available: http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/leyesynormas/?SEMARNAT%20DOF/Norma%20Oficial%20Mexican?a%20NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010.pdf Accessed: 2011 January 24.
[28]  IUCN (2011) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. Available: www.iucnredlist.org Accessed: 2011 February 11.
[29]  Moreno-Baez M (2010) Mapping human dimensions of small-scale fisheries in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico. Phd Dissertation. The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 322 p.
[30]  Márquez F, Smith WD, Bizzarro JJ (2006) Rhinobatos productus. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. Available: www.iucnredlist.org Accessed: 2011 February 15.
[31]  Márquez-Farias JF (2007) Reproductive biology of shovelnose guitarfish Rhinobatos productus from the eastern Gulf of California México. Mar Biol 151: 1445.1454
[32]  Beck MW, Heck Jr KL, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, et al. (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51: 663–641. Available: http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications?/76604.pdf Accessed: 2011 June 01.
[33]  Salomón-Aguilar C, Villavicencio-Garayzar C, Reyes-Bonilla H (2009) Shark breeding grounds and seasons in the Gulf of California: Fishery management and conservation strategy; Zonas y temporadas de reproducción y crianza de tiburones en el Golfo de California: Estrategia para su conservación y manejo pesquero. Ciencias Marinas 35: 369–388. Available: http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/480/4801318?4005.pdf Accessed: 2011 June 01.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133