全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Interspecific Variation in Life History Relates to Antipredator Decisions by Marine Mesopredators on Temperate Reefs

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040083

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

As upper-level predatory fishes become overfished, mesopredators rise to become the new ‘top’ predators of over-exploited marine communities. To gain insight into ensuing mechanisms that might alter indirect species interactions, we examined how behavioural responses to an upper-level predatory fish might differ between mesopredator species with different life histories. In rocky reefs of the northeast Pacific Ocean, adult lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) are upper-level predators that use a sit-and-wait hunting mode. Reef mesopredators that are prey to adult lingcod include kelp greenling (Hexagrammos decagrammus), younger lingcod, copper rockfish (Sebastes caurinus) and quillback rockfish (S. maliger). Across these mesopredators species, longevity and age at maturity increases and, consequently, the annual proportion of lifetime reproductive output decreases in the order just listed. Therefore, we hypothesized that the level of risk taken to acquire resources would vary interspecifically in that same order. During field experiments we manipulated predation risk with a model adult lingcod and used fixed video cameras to quantify interactions between mesopredators and tethered prey (Pandalus shrimps). We predicted that the probabilities of inspecting and attacking tethered prey would rank from highest to lowest and the timing of these behaviours would rank from earliest to latest as follows: kelp greenling, lingcod, copper rockfish, and quillback rockfish. We also predicted that responses to the model lingcod, such as avoidance of interactions with tethered prey, would rank from weakest to strongest in the same order. Results were consistent with our predictions suggesting that, despite occupying similar trophic levels, longer-lived mesopredators with late maturity have stronger antipredator responses and therefore experience lower foraging rates in the presence of predators than mesopredators with faster life histories. The corollary is that the fishery removal of top predators, which relaxes predation risk, could potentially lead to stronger increases in foraging rates for mesopredators with slower life histories.

References

[1]  Pauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila UR, et al. (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418: 689–695.
[2]  Strong DR, Frank KT (2010) Human Involvement in Food Webs. In: Gadgil A, Liverman DM, editors. pp. 1–23. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.
[3]  Heithaus M, Frid A, Wirsing A, Worm B (2008) Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 202–210.
[4]  Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 94: 421–425.
[5]  Estes JA, Terborgh J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, et al. (2011) Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth. Science 333: 301–306.
[6]  Prugh LR, Stoner CJ, Epps CW, Bean WT, Ripple WJ, et al. (2009) The Rise of the Mesopredator. Bioscience 59: 779–791.
[7]  Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619–640.
[8]  Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84: 1083–1100.
[9]  Clark CW (1994) Antipredator behavior and the asset-protection principle. Behavioral Ecology 5: 159–170.
[10]  Warner RR (1998) The role of extreme iteroparity and risk avoidance in the evolution of mating systems. Journal of Fish Biology 53: 82–93.
[11]  Stearns SC (1976) Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Quarterly Review of Biology 51: 3–47.
[12]  Love M, Yoklavich M, Thorsteinson L, editors (2002) The Rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
[13]  Nemeth DH (1997) Modulation of buccal pressure during prey capture in Hexagrammos decagrammus (Teleostei: Hexagrammidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 200: 2145–2154.
[14]  Beaudreau A, Essington T (2007) Spatial, temporal, and ontogenetic patterns of predation on rockfishes by lingcod. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 1438–1452.
[15]  Beaudreau AH (2009) The Predatory Role of Lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) in the San Juan Archipelago, Washington [Dissertation]. Seattle: University of Washington. 193 p.
[16]  Murie DJ (1995) Comparative feeding ecology of two sympatric rockfish congeners, Sebastes caurinus (copper rockfish) and S. maliger (quillback rockfish). Marine Biology 124: 341–353.
[17]  Shanks AL, Eckert GL (2005) Population persistence of California Current fishes and benthic crustaceans: A marine drift paradox. Ecological Monographs 75: 505–524.
[18]  Froese R, Pauly D, editors (2012) FishBase. Accessed 2012 Jun 6.
[19]  Cass A, Beamish R, McFarlane G (1990) Lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus). Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 109: 40 p.
[20]  Berkeley SA, Chapman C, Sogard SM (2004) Maternal age as a determinant of larval growth and survival in a marine fish, Sebastes melanops. Ecology 85: 1258–1264.
[21]  M?ller AP (2010) Interspecific variation in fear responses predicts urbanization in birds. Behavioral Ecology 21: 365–371.
[22]  Zar JH, editor (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall Inc.
[23]  Ball SL, Baker RL (1996) Predator-induced life history changes: Antipredator behavior costs or facultative life history shifts? Ecology 77: 1116–1124.
[24]  Frid A, Marliave J (2010) Predatory fishes affect trophic cascades and apparent competition in temperate reefs. Biology Letters 6: 533–536.
[25]  King J, Surry A (2000) Lingcod stock assessment and recommended yield options for 2001. Canadian Stock Assessment Secreteriat, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Research Document 2000/164.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133